하악 임플란트 오버덴쳐에서 어태치먼트 종류에 따른 응력분포
The Influence of Attachment Type on the Distribution of Occlusal Force in Implant Supported Overdentures
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
하악 완전 무치악 환자에서 이공 사이에 2개의 임플란트를 식립한 후 4종류의 어태치먼트를 사용한 하악 오버덴쳐를 제작하여 유한요소 모델을 만들고 여기에 3가지 하중 조건을 가하여 유한요소 해석 프로그램인 ANSYS 10.0을 이용하여 어태치먼트 종류에 따른 임플란트 주위골과 보철물 및 임플란트와 골 사이 계면에 발생하는 최대 응력의 크기와 응력 분포양상을 분석하였다. 하악골체의 전체적인 골격구조에서 치아 부분은 오버덴쳐로 모델을 형성하였고 오버덴쳐와 하악골 사이에 2mm 두께의 점막을 삽입하였다. 임플란트 오버덴쳐의 유한요소 모델은 ball and socket, Locator, magnet, bar의 각각 4가지 형태를 제작하였다. 고정체의 식립 위치는 양측 이공 전방이고, 경계 조건 중 고정점은 하악각 부위와 모형의 최후방 절점들을 고정점으로 설정하였다. 하중조건은 오버덴쳐의 좌측 제 2소구치에서 제 2대구치 편측 부위에 170N의 하중을, 좌․우측 제 2소구치에서 제 2대구치 양측 부위에 170N의 하중을, 90°수직 방향, 45°경사, 그리고 0° 수평 방향으로 가하였다. 결과 분석시 모든 하중방향에서 응력의 크기는 bar에서 임플란트나 오버덴쳐에서 가장 크게 나타났으며, 계면에서의 응력은 모든 어태치먼트에서 비슷한 응력분포가 나타났다. Ball and socket, Locator, magnet에서는 유의성을 보이지 않았다. 응력의 분포도에서는 4종류의 어태치먼트 모두 임플란트 치경부에서 응력이 집중된 양상을 보였으며 bar타입에서는 bar의 중앙에 응력이 크게나타났다. 이상의 결과로 볼 때 어태치먼트의 종류에 따라 응력분포의 차이가 있었음을 확인할 수 있었다. 어태치먼트의 선정 시 응력집중을 완화시킬 수 있는 바람직한 설계와 선택이 필요하리라 사료된다.
Abstract
Statement of problem: Implant supported overdenture is accepted widely as a way to restore edentulous ridge providing better retention and support of dentures. Various types of attachment for overdenture have been developed. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of attachment type in implant overdentures on the biomechanical stress distribution in the surrounding bone, prosthesis and interface between implant and bone. Material and methods: Finite element analysis method was used. Average CT image of mandibular body(Digital Korea®, KISTI, Korea) was used to produce a mandibular model. Overdentures were placed instead of mandibular teeth and 2mm of mucosa was inserted between the overdenture and mandible. Two implants(USII®, Osstem, Korea) were placed at both cuspid area and 4 types of overdenture were fabricated ; ball and socket , Locator , magnet and bar type. Load was applied on the from second premolar to second molar tooth area. 6 times of finite element analyses were performed according to the direction of the force 90°, 45°, 0° and unilateral or bilateral force applied. The stress at interface between implants and bone, and prosthesis and the bone around implants ware compared using von Mises stress. The results were explained with color coded graphs based on the equivalent stress to distinguish the force distribution pattern and the site of maximum stress concentration. Results: Unilateral loading showed that connection area between implant fixture and bar generated maximum stress in bar type overdentures. Bar type produced 100 Mpa which means the most among 4 types of attachments. Bilateral loading, however, showed that bar type was more stable than other implants(magnet, ball and socket). 26 Mpa of bar type was about a half of other types on overdenture under 90° bilateral loading. Conclusions: In any directions of stress, bar type was proved to be the most vulnerable type in both implants and overdentures. Interface stress did not show any significant difference in stress distribution pattern.
참고문헌 (48)
- Mericske-Stern R., "Clinical evaluation of overdenture restoration supported by osseointegrated titanium implants: a retrospective study", Int J Oral Maxillalofac Implants, 5, pp.375~383 (1990)
- Burns DR, "Prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular implant overdentures: PartⅠ-Retention, stability and tissue response", J Prosthet Dent, 73, pp.354~363 (1995)
- Burns DR, "Prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular implant overdentures: Part Ⅱ-Patient satisfaction and preference", J Prosthet Dent, 73, pp.364~369 (1995)
- Carlsson GE, "Long-term marginal periimplant bone loss in edentulous patients", Int J Prosthodont, 13, pp.295~302 (2000)
- Naert I, "Prosthetic aspects of osseointegrated fixtures supporting overdentures. A 4-year report", J Prosthet Dent, 65, pp.671~680 (1991)
- Zarb GA, "The edentulous milieu", J Prosthet Dent, 49, pp.825~831 (1983)
- Trakas T, "Attachment systems for implant retained overdentures: a literature review", Implant Dent, 15, pp.24~34 (2006)
- 박원희, "임플랜트 지지 보철물에서 고정체의 식립위치와 각도에 따른 삼차원 유한요소법적 응력분석에 관한 연구", 대한치과보철학회지, 43(1), pp.61~77 (2005), 대한치과보철학회
- 홍해룡, "하악 임플랜트 유지형 피개의치의 안정성과 하악골 응력분포에 대한3차원 유한요소법적 연구", 대한치과보철학회지, 45(5), pp.633~643 (2007), 대한치과보철학회
- Kenney R, "Photoelastic stress patterns produced by implant retained overdentures", J Prosthet Dent, 80, pp.559~564 (1998)
- Kang JM, "Photoelastic stress analysis on the mandible caused by implant overdenture", J Korean Acad Prosthodont, 32, pp.327~353 (1994)
- Ichikawa T, "In vitro study of mandibular implant-retained overdentures: the influence of stud attachments on load transfer to the implant and soft tissue", Int J Prosthodont, 9, pp.394~399 (1996)
- Meijer H, "Location of implants in the interforaminal region of the mandible and the consequences for the design of the superstructure", J Oral Rehabil, 21, pp.47~56 (1994)
- Meijer H, "Three-dimensional finite element study on two versus four implants in an edentulous mandible", Int J Prosthodont, 7, pp.271~279 (1994)
- Giulio M, "Mandibular implant-retained overdenture: finite element analysis of two anchorage systems", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 13, pp.369~376 (1998)
- Labaig C, "Biodynamics of attachments used in overdentures: experimental analysis with photoelasticity", Quintessence Int, 28, pp.183~190 (1997)
- Federick D, "Effects of overdenture retention designs and implant orientations on load transfer characteristics", J Prosthet Dent, 76, pp.624~632 (1996)
- Mericske-Stern R, "3-D in vivo force measurements on mandibular implants supporting overdentures. A comparative study", Clin Oral Implants Res, 7, pp.387~396 (1996)
- Lavelle CL, "Biomechanical considerations of prosthodontic therapy: The urgency of research into alveolar bone response", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 8, pp.179~185 (1993)
- Brochers L, "Three-dimensional stress distribution around a dental implant at different stages of interface development", J Dent Res, 62, pp.155~159 (1983)
- Cook SD, "A three dimensional finite element analysis of porous rooted Co-Cr-Mo alloy dental implants", J Prosthet Dent, 61, pp.25~29 (1982)
- Naert I, "Overdentures supported by osseointegrated fixtures for the edentulous mandible: A 2.5 year report", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 3, pp.191~196 (1988)
- Misch CE, "Prosthetic options in implant dentistry. Contemporary implant dentistry", pp.92~104 (2008), Mosby
- Skalak R, "Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses", J Prosthet Dent, 49, pp.843~850 (1983)
- Muhlemann, H.R., "Tooth mobility: Its cause and significance", J Periodontol, 36, pp.148~156 (1965)
- Van Steenberghe, "D. A retrospective multicenter evaluation of the survival rate of osseointegrated fixture supporting fixed partial prosthesis in the treatment of partial edentulism", J Prosthet Dent, 61, pp.217~223 (1989)
- Parfitt, G.S., "Measurement of the physiologic mobility of individual teeth in an axial direction", J Dent Res, 39, pp.68~73 (1960)
- Pillar RM, "Observations on the effect of movement on bone ingrowth into porous surfaced implants", Clin Orthop Releat Res, 208, pp.108~113 (1986)
- Adell R, "A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw", Int J Oral Surg, 10, pp.389~398 (1981)
- Proffit WR, "Occlusal force in normal and long-face adults", J Dent Res, 62, pp.566~570 (1983)
- Linderholm H, "Isometric bite force and its relation to general muscle force and body build", Acta Odontal Scand, 28, pp.679~689 (1970)
- Christensen J, "Dimension discremination at two different degrees of mouth opening and the effect of anesthesia applied to the periodontal ligaments", J Oral Rehabil, 4, pp.157~164 (1977)
- Haraldsson T, "Bite force and oral function in complete denture wearers", J Oral Rehabil, 6, pp.41~48 (1979)
- Mericske-Stern R, "Maximal biting force and minimal pressure threshold measured on patients with overdentures supported by implants or natural roots: A comparative study, Part 1", Int J Oral Maxillalofac Implants, 8, pp.641~649 (1993)
- Koolstra JH, "A three-dimensional mathematical model of the human masticatory system predicting maximum possible bite forces", J Biomech, 21, pp.563~576 (1988)
- Mericske-Stern R, "Three dimensional force measurements on mandibular implants supportingoverdentures", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 7, pp.185~194 (1992)
- Atilla S, "Finite element analysis of the effects of cantilever and implant length on stress distribution in an implant-supported fixed prostheses", J Prosthet Dent, 76, pp.165~169 (1996)
- Borchers L, "Three-dimensional stress distribution around a dental implant at different stages of interface development", J Dent Res, 62, pp.155~159 (1983)
- Robert G. Craig, "Chap 4. Mechanical properties. Restorative dental materials", pp.82~ (1989), Mosby
- Rangert B, "Forces and moments on Bränemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:241-7.implant interface", Clinical Materials, 10, pp.153~201 (1992)
- Lum LB, "Load transfer from endosteal implants to supporting bone: An analysis using statics. part two: Axial loading", J Oral Implantol, 18, pp.349~353 (1992)
- 제홍지, "상악 임플란트 overdenture에서 anchorage system과 의치상 구개피개가 하중전달에 미치는 영향", 대한치과보철학회지, 42(4), pp.397~411 (2004), 대한치과보철학회
- Thayer H, "Occlusal force transmission by overdenture attachments", J Prosthet Dent, 41, pp.266~271 (1979)
- Evans FG, "Mechanical properties of bone", pp.83~94 (1973), Charles C Thomas
- Brunski JB, "Biomechanical factors affecting the bone-dental implant interface", Clinical Materials, 10, pp.153~201 (1992)
- Hertel R, "Influence of the dimensions of implant superstructure on peri-implant bone loss", Int J Prosthodont, 6, pp.18~24 (1993)
- Rieger M, "Finite element analysis of six endosseous implants", J Prosthet Dent, 63, pp.671~676 (1990)
- Sadowsky SJ, "Effect of anchorage system and basecontact on load transfer with mandibular implant-retained overdenture", J Prosthet Dent, 84, pp.327~334 (2000)