발치, 비발치를 동반한 교정치료 전후의 안모의 변화에 관한 인지도
The Esthetic Impact of Extraction and Nonextraction Treatments on Korean People
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
교정 치료 시 발치에 대한 개념은 수없이 변화되어 왔었고, 현재도 발치 치료와 비발치 치료에 대한 기준은 변하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 한국인에서 발치, 비발치 치료에 따른 주관적 안모심미변화를 조사하고, 또한 평가자에 따른 치료결과에 대한 인식의 차이를 알아보았다. 본 연구는 단국대학교 치과대학병원 교정 클리닉에 내원하여 교정치료를 종료한 환자 중, 소구치 발치 환자 59명, 비발치 환자 60명, 총 119명을 대상으로 하였다. 전문가와 비전문가로 이루어진 평가단원이 치료 전 후 측방두부방사선사진의 연조직 트레이싱을 VAS 평가하여 그 결과를 통계처리 하였다. 그리하여 도출한 결론은 다음과 같다. 1. 발치와 비발치의 평균 점수는 발치가 5.76, 비발치가 5.28로 발치를 한경우의 안모 개선 정도가 더 양호하게 받아들여졌다. 2. 일반인의 평균 점수는 5.165, 전문가 집단은 5.875로 이 연구에서는 일반인 집단보다 전문가 집단에서 전체적으로 더 높은 평가를 하였다. 3. 전문가 집단에서 발치와 비발치 환자를 평가하였을 때, 발치를 한 경우 유의하게 더 높은 점수가 나왔다. 4. 일반인 집단에서 발치와 비발치 환자를 평가하였을 때, 발치를 한 경우 더 높은 점수가 나왔으나 유의성 있는 차이는 존재하지 않는다. 5. 비발치 case에서는 전문가 집단이 일반인 집단 보다 유의성 있게 더 높은 평가를 내렸다. 6. 발치 case에서는 일반인보다 전문가 집단의 점수가 더 높았으나 유의성 있는 결과는 아니다.
Abstract
The concept of extraction in orthodontic treatment has been changed many times. Even today, criteria of extraction or nonextraction is still changing. In this study, changes depending on the evaluator’s perception of treatment outcomes were compared in both extraction and nonextraction cases. In this study, premolar extracted 59 patients and nonextracted 60 patients, totally 119 patients who finished orthodontic treatment in Dankook University Dental Hospital orthodontic clinic were enrolled. Evaluation sections made up of specialists and laypersons assessed soft tissue traced from lateral cephalometric radiographs with visual analogue scale before and after the treatment. And the results were statistically analyzed. Thus, the conclusions drawn are as follows:1. Average score is 5.76 in extraction, which is larger than 5.28 of nonextraction case. Improvement of facial profile was more favorably accepted in extraction case. 2. 5.875 in the group of specialists were higher evaluation than 5.165 in the group of layperson. 3. Specialists gave significantly higher ratings in the extraction than nonextraction. 4. A higher rating in extraction case of the layperson group has no significant difference with nonextraction case. 5. Nonextraction patients were given higher ratings from specialist group. 6. A higher rating of specialist group in extraction case has no significant difference with layperson group.
참고문헌 (17)
- Bowman SJ, "More than lip service: facial esthetics in orthodontics", J Am Dent Assoc, 130, pp.1173~1181 (1999)
- Proffit WR, "Forty-year review of extraction frequencies at a university orthodontic clinic", Angle Orthod, 64, pp.407~414 (1994)
- Peck H, "A concept of facial esthetics", Angle Orthod, 40, pp.284~318 (1970)
- Peck S, "Selected aspects of the art and science of facial esthetics", Semin Orthod, 1, pp.105~126 (1995)
- Scott SH, "The perceived impact of extraction and nonextraction treatments on matched samples of African American patients", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 116, pp.352~360 (1999)
- Bowman SJ, "The esthetic impact of extraction and nonextraction treatments on Caucasian patients", Angle Orthod, 1, pp.3~10 (2000)
- Wangerin K, "Improving the contour and preserving the profile of the lower third of the face", Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir, 1(Suppl 1), pp.S39~S49 (1997)
- Soh J, "A comparative assessment of the perception of Chinese facial profile esthetics", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 127(6), pp.692~699 (2005)
- Konstantonis D, "The impact of extraction vs nonextraction treatment on soft tissue changes in Class I borderline malocclusions", Angle Orthod, 82(2), pp.209~217 (2012)
- Xu TM, "Cephalometric comparison of soft-tissue morphology between borderline cases", Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao, 36(6), pp.650~654 (2004)
- Bell R, "Perceptions of facial profile and their influence on the decision to undergo orthognathic surgery", Am J Orthod, 88(4), pp.323~332 (1985)
- Lines PA, "Profilemetrics and facial esthetics", Am J Orthod, 73(6), pp.648~657 (1978)
- Naini FB, "Assessing the influence of lower facial profile convexity on perceived attractiveness in the orthognathic patient, clinician, and layperson", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod (2012)
- Naini FB, "Assessing the influence of asymmeftry affecting the mandible and chin point on perceived attractiveness in the orthognathic patient, clinician, and layperson", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 70(1), pp.192~206 (2012)
- Naini FB, "Assessing the influence of mandibular prominence on perceived attractiveness in the orthognathic patient, clinician, and layperson", Eur J Orthod (2011)
- Howells DJ, "The validity and reliability of ratings of dental and facial attractiveness for epidemiologic use", Am J Orthod, 88(5), pp.402~408 (1985)
- Phillips C, "Perception of facial attractiveness by patients, peers, and professionals", Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg, 10(2), pp.127~135 (1995)