How question shuffling influences correlation of student item selections in computer-bases test
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Handling Computer Based Test (CBT) in large classroom requires more of test reliability. Because of limited space assigned to each student, computer monitors are positioned close together so that reliability of exam goes under question also the environment makes student vulnerable to copy from their neighbors. A method to deter students from copying answers of their colleagues is to shuffle items in multiple choice questions. Objective of this study is compare student selected items and questions before and after randomizing assessment of multiple choice test to emphasize that reordering questions can set an environment to discourage students from copying answers of their colleagues in an exam room. This study used existing data from students enrolled in circulation system assessment of Pusan National University School of Medicine over two academic semester year of 2013 and 2016 and measured for correlation coefficient of pre and post randomization. Statistically significant relationship between selected items were found in favor of item shuffling in CBT.
Abstract
Handling Computer Based Test (CBT) in large classroom requires more of test reliability. Because of limited space assigned to each student, computer monitors are positioned close together so that reliability of exam goes under question also the environment makes student vulnerable to copy from their neighbors. A method to deter students from copying answers of their colleagues is to shuffle items in multiple choice questions. Objective of this study is compare student selected items and questions before and after randomizing assessment of multiple choice test to emphasize that reordering questions can set an environment to discourage students from copying answers of their colleagues in an exam room. This study used existing data from students enrolled in circulation system assessment of Pusan National University School of Medicine over two academic semester year of 2013 and 2016 and measured for correlation coefficient of pre and post randomization. Statistically significant relationship between selected items were found in favor of item shuffling in CBT.
참고문헌 (10)
- N. W. Van Yperen, "Win, or Not to Lose, At Any Cost:The Impact of Achievement Goals on Cheating", British Journal of Management, 22, pp.S5~S15 (2011)
- G. J. Cizek, "Handbook of formative assessment", pp.3~17 (2010), Taylor and Francis
- A. Kusnoor, "Cheating in medical school: the unacknowledged ailment", South Medical Journal, 8, pp.479~483 (2013)
- W. Krongkarn, "A Preliminary Study of Distance Between Examination Seats for Preventing Cheat With Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff", IMECS, Proceedings of the International Multi Conference of Engineers and Computer Sciences, 2 (2011)
- G. J. Cizek, "Defining and distinguishing validity: Interpretations of score meaning and justifications of test use", Psychological Methods, 1, pp.31~43 (2012)
- M. Escudier, "Student acceptability of high-stakes e-assessment in dental education: using privacy screen filters to control cheating", Journal of Dental Education, 4, pp.558~566 (2014)
- K. D. Royal, "The ‘10 Most Wanted’ test cheaters in medical education", Medical Education, 50, pp.1241~1244 (2016)
- D. C. Dawn, "is honesty in the biochemistry classroom laboratory: A synthesis of causes and prevention", Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 34, pp.338~342 (2006)
- J. L. Palmer, "Nursing Examinations Promotion of Integrity and Prevention of Cheating", Nurse Educator, 41, pp.180~184 (2016)
- R. J. Fendler, "Observing and Deterring Social Cheating on College Exams", International Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 12, pp.Article 4~ (2018)