본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Effects of Frivolous Comments on the Performance of Computer-Mediated Group Idea Generation

0

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경영학

초록

Despite superior performance of computer-based brainstorming over other means such as Nominal and Face-to-Face brainstorming, prior research points out many remaining process losses that hinder the performance of computer-based brainstorming. Studies have, thus far, focused on how to improve process gains while neglecting how to mitigate process losses that may be more efficient and effective to enhance productivity. One aspect of such process losses that have received little attention is how to control task-irrelevant comments that often have a negative contagion effect on performance. This study posits that such frivolous comments draw more attention faster than task-relevant information and are more likely to induce the same or similar type of comments, undermining performance norm. The results showed that individuals who were exposed to frivolous comments stimuli exhibited more social loafing than individuals who were not exposed to such stimuli. However, interestingly, individuals in the moderate junk comment condition performed better than individuals in the 0% and 45% junk comments conditions. Unlike our prediction, it appears that an extra dose of random noise can be beneficial rather than hindering the performance under the conditions of normal distribution of high, low, and medium performers and constant high-quality ideas stimulation. In sum, feelings of dispensability in the 0% and 45% junk comments condition have further induced “diminishing marginal utility,” depressing overall task performance. The implications of these findings for future research, as well as the implications for the design of group idea generation procedures are discussed.

Abstract

Despite superior performance of computer-based brainstorming over other means such as Nominal and Face-to-Face brainstorming, prior research points out many remaining process losses that hinder the performance of computer-based brainstorming. Studies have, thus far, focused on how to improve process gains while neglecting how to mitigate process losses that may be more efficient and effective to enhance productivity. One aspect of such process losses that have received little attention is how to control task-irrelevant comments that often have a negative contagion effect on performance. This study posits that such frivolous comments draw more attention faster than task-relevant information and are more likely to induce the same or similar type of comments, undermining performance norm. The results showed that individuals who were exposed to frivolous comments stimuli exhibited more social loafing than individuals who were not exposed to such stimuli. However, interestingly, individuals in the moderate junk comment condition performed better than individuals in the 0% and 45% junk comments conditions. Unlike our prediction, it appears that an extra dose of random noise can be beneficial rather than hindering the performance under the conditions of normal distribution of high, low, and medium performers and constant high-quality ideas stimulation. In sum, feelings of dispensability in the 0% and 45% junk comments condition have further induced “diminishing marginal utility,” depressing overall task performance. The implications of these findings for future research, as well as the implications for the design of group idea generation procedures are discussed.

참고문헌 (70)

  1. 양필석, "혁신적 분위기가 핵심자기평가와 혁신행동에 미치는 영향 : 핵심자기평가의 매개효과를 중심으로", 경영연구, 26(4), pp.19~42 (2011), 한국산업경영학회
  2. 이재훈, "HRM 시스템이 혁신과 성과에 미치는 영향 - 전략의 조절효과를 중심으로 -", 경영연구, 27(1), pp.21~48 (2012), 한국산업경영학회
  3. 정종호, "The Effects of Objective Self-Awareness and Ostracism on Reducing Junk Comments in Computer-Based Idea Generation", 경영연구, 25(1), pp.313~336 (2010), 한국산업경영학회
  4. 최종민, "조직간 정보교류와 조직간 관계유형 구분의 틀", 경영연구, 23(2), pp.215~248 (2008), 한국산업경영학회
  5. Amabile, T. M, "Creativity in Context: Update to the Social Psychology of Creativity" (1996), Westview Press
  6. Anderson, K. J, "Caffeine, Impulsivity, and Memory Scanning: A Comparison of two Explanations for the Yerkes-Dodson Effect", Motivation and Emotion, 13, pp.1~20 (1989)
  7. Arrow, H, "Small Groups As Complex Systems" (2000), Sage Publications
  8. Baeyens, F, "Flavor-Flavor and Color-Flavor Conditioning in Humans", Learning and Motivation, 21, pp.434~455 (1990)
  9. Baumeister, R. F, "Bad is Stronger Than Good", Review of General Psychology, 5, pp.323~370 (2001)
  10. Brown, B, "A Simple Dynamic Model of Social Factors in Group Brainstorming", Small Group Research, 27, pp.91~114 (1996)
  11. Carver, C. S, "The Self-Attention-Induced Feedback Loop and Social Facilitation", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17, pp.545~568 (1981)
  12. Connolly, T, "Effects of Anonymity and Evaluative Tone on Idea Generation in Computer-Mediated Groups", Management Science, 36, pp.689~703 (1990)
  13. Connolly, T, "On the Effectiveness of Group Brainstorming Test of One Underlying Cognitive Mechanism", Small Group Research, 24, pp.490~503 (1993)
  14. Denning, P, "Electronic Junk", Communications of the ACM, 25, pp.163~165 (1982)
  15. Dennis, A. R, "Structuring Time and Task in Electronic Brainstorming", MIS Quarterly, 23, pp.95~108 (1999)
  16. Dennis, A. R, "Computer Brainstorms: More Heads Are Better Than One", Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, pp.531~537 (1993)
  17. Dennis, A. R, "The Effectiveness of Multiple Dialogs in Electronic Brainstorming", Information Systems Research, 8, pp.196~211 (1997)
  18. Devine, D. J, "Do smarter teams do better: A meta-analysis of cognitive ability and team performance", Small Group Research, 32, pp.507~532 (2001)
  19. Diehl, M, "Productivity Loss in Brainstorming Groups: Toward the Solution of a Riddle", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, pp.497~509 (1987)
  20. Duval, S, "A Theory of Objective Self Awareness" (1972), Academic Press
  21. Gallupe, R. B, "Blocking Electronic Brainstorms", Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, pp.77~86 (1994)
  22. Gallupe, R. B, "Electronic Brainstorming and Group Size", Academy of Management Journal, 35, pp.350~369 (1992)
  23. Gammaitoni, L, "Stochastic Resonance", Reviews of Modern Physics, 70, pp.223~287 (1998)
  24. Garfield, M. J, "Research Report: Modifying Paradigms–Individual Differences, Creativity, Techniques, and Exposure to Ideas in Group Idea Generation", Information Systems Research, 12, pp.322~333 (2001)
  25. Grisé, M, "Information Overload: Addressing the Productivity Paradox in Face-to-Face Electronic Meetings", Journal of Management Information Systems, 16, pp.157~185 (2000)
  26. "GroupSystems" (2011)[URL]
  27. Harkins, S. G, "Social Loafing and Social Facilitation", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23, pp.1~18 (1987)
  28. Herschel, R, "Exploring Numerical Proportions in a Unique Context: The Group Support Systems Meeting Environment", Sex Roles, 31, pp.99~123 (1994)
  29. Hilmer, K. M, "Stimulating Thinking: Cultivating Better Decisions with Groupware Through Categorization", Journal of Management Information Systems, 17, pp.93~114 (2001)
  30. Hiltz, S. R, "Structuring Computer-Mediated Communication Systems to Avoid Information Overload", Communications of the ACM, 28, pp.59~85 (1985)
  31. Hirshleifer, D, "Cooperation in a Repeated Prisoners’Dilemma with Ostracism", Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 12, pp.87~106 (1989)
  32. Holtzworth-Munroe, A, "Causal Attributions of Married Couples: When Do They Search for Causes? What Do They Conclude When They Do?", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, pp.1398~1412 (1985)
  33. Kerr, N. L, "Dispensability of Member Effort and Group Motivation Losses: Free-Rider Effects", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, pp.78~94 (1983)
  34. Klein, E. E, "The Role of Computer Support Tools and Gender Composition in Innovative Information System Idea Generation by Small Groups", Computers in Human Behavior, 16, pp.111~139 (2000)
  35. Jessup, L. M, "The Effects of Anonymity on GDSS Group Process with an Idea-Generating Task", MIS Quarterly, 14, pp.313~321 (1990)
  36. Jessup, L. M, "Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Group Support Systems Research: Learning From Groups Gone Awry", Small Group Research, 28, pp.394~413 (1997)
  37. Jung, J. H, "The Influence of Real-Time Identifiability and Evaluability Performance Feedback on Group Electronic Brainstorming Performance", Proc. 38th Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci (2005)
  38. Jung, J. H, "The Effects of Real-Time Individual Performance Feedback and Goal Setting on Computer-Mediated Group Idea Generation", Proc. 26th Internat. Conf. Information Systems (2005)
  39. Laughlin, P. R, "Individual versus Tetradic Performance on a Unidimensional Complementary Task as a Function of Initial Ability Level", Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 8, pp.201~216 (1972)
  40. Lickel, B, "Varieties of Groups and the Perception of Group Entitativity", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, pp.223~246 (2000)
  41. Luthans, F, "Organizational Behavior" (2002), McGraw-Hill
  42. McGrath, J, "Dilemmatics: The Study of Research Choices and Dilemmas, In Judgment Calls In Research", pp.69~102 (1982), Sage Pubs
  43. McGrath, J, "Groups: Interaction and Performance" (1984), Prentice Hall
  44. Michener, H. A, "Social Psychology" (1999), Harcourt Brace College Publisher
  45. Mouton, J. S, "The Relationship between Frequency of Yielding and the Disclosure of Personal Identity", Journal of Personality, 24, pp.339~347 (1956)
  46. Nagasundaram, M, "When a Group is not a Group: The Cognitive Foundation of Group Idea Generation", Small Group Research, 24, pp.463~489 (1993)
  47. Nunamaker, J. F, "Electronic Meeting Systems to Support Group Work", Communications of the ACM, 34, pp.40~61 (1991)
  48. Parks, C. D, "Group performance and interaction" (1999), Westview Press
  49. Paulus, P. B, "Enhancing Ideational Creativity in Groups: Lesson From Research on Brainstorming, In Group Creativity: Innovation Through Collaboration", pp.110~136 (2003), Oxford University Press
  50. Paulus, P. B, "Creativity in Groups and Teams, In Groups at Work: Theory and Research", pp.319~338 (2001), Lawrence Erlbaum
  51. Paulus, P. B, "Social Influence Process in Computer Brainstorming", Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 18, pp.3~14 (1996)
  52. Pinsonneault, A, "The Illusion of Electronic Brainstorming Productivity: Theoretical and Empirical Issues", Information Systems Research, 10, pp.378~380 (1999)
  53. Pinsonneault, A, "Anonymity in Group Support Systems Research: A New Conceptualization, Measure, and Contingency Framework", Journal of Management Information Systems, 14, pp.89~108 (1998)
  54. Pratto, F, "Automatic Vigilance: The Attention-Grabbing Power of Negative Social Information", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, pp.380~391 (1991)
  55. Roy, M. C, "Electronic Group Brainstorming: The Role of Feedback on Productivity", Small Group Research, 27, pp.215~247 (1996)
  56. Rozin, P, "Negative Bias, Negativity Dominance, and Contagion", Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, pp.296~320 (2001)
  57. Sedikides, C, "Self-Evaluation: To Thine Own Self Be Good, To Thine Own Self Be Sure, To Thine Own Self Be True, and To Thine Own Self Be Better, In Advances in Experimental Social psychology", pp.209~269 (1997), academic Press
  58. Shannon, C. E, "The Mathematical Theory of Communication" (1949), University of Illinois
  59. Speier, C, "The Influence of Task Interruption on Individual Decision Making: An Information Overload Perspective", Decision Sciences, 30, pp.337~360 (1999)
  60. Szymanski, K, "Social loafing and self-evaluation with a social standard", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, pp.891~897 (1987)
  61. Taylor, S, "Asymmetirical Effects of Positive and Negative Events: The Mobilization-Minimalization Hypothesis", Psychological Bulletin, 110, pp.67~85 (1991)
  62. Taylor, S. E, "Self-evaluation Processes", Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, pp.1278~1287 (1995)
  63. Tziner, A, "Effects of crew composition on crew performance: Does the whole equal the sum of its parts?", Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, pp.85~93 (1985)
  64. Valacich, J. S, "Idea Generation in Computer-Based Groups: A New Ending to an Old Story", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57, pp.448~467 (1994)
  65. Valacich, J. S, "The Effcets of Individual Cognitive Ability and Idea Stimulation on Idea-Generation Performance", Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 10, pp.1~15 (2006)
  66. VanGundy, A. B, "Idea Power: Techniques & Resources to Unleash the Creativity in Your Organization" (1992), AMACOM
  67. Weldon, E, "Felt Dispensability in Groups of Coactors: The Effects of Shared Responsibility and Explicit Anonymity on Cognitive Effort", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41, pp.330~351 (1988)
  68. Williams, K. D, "Cyberostracism: Effcets of Being Ignored Over the Internet", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, pp.748~762 (2000)
  69. Woodman. R. W, "Toward a theory of organizational creativity", Academy of Management Review, 18, pp.293~321 (1993)
  70. Zajonc, R. B, "Attitudinal Effects of Mere Exposure", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, pp.1~29 (1968)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)