Compensation Peer Effect and Strategic Cost Management
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study examines the association between the incentive effects of peer selection and enhances efficient strategic cost management with future value. We find that firms with strong peers have the discretion to increase firm future value by spurring strategic cost return. To investigate the peer effect, we use the peer quality index (PQI) to capture the compensation-peer disclosure information. Using alternate model specifications, we consistently find that strategic cost management with future value is positively associated with PQI. Based on these findings, we conclude that peer-induced incentive effects from high-paid peers pursue greater efficient investments, leading to greater future value to compete if any, peer selection issues. Finally, the study outlines possible avenues that scholars can pursue to further examine the productive role of peer effects in strategic cost management with firm value.
Abstract
This study examines the association between the incentive effects of peer selection and enhances efficient strategic cost management with future value. We find that firms with strong peers have the discretion to increase firm future value by spurring strategic cost return. To investigate the peer effect, we use the peer quality index (PQI) to capture the compensation-peer disclosure information. Using alternate model specifications, we consistently find that strategic cost management with future value is positively associated with PQI. Based on these findings, we conclude that peer-induced incentive effects from high-paid peers pursue greater efficient investments, leading to greater future value to compete if any, peer selection issues. Finally, the study outlines possible avenues that scholars can pursue to further examine the productive role of peer effects in strategic cost management with firm value.
참고문헌 (20)
- Abarbanell, J., "Fundamental analysis, future earnings, and stock prices", Journal of Accounting Research, 35, pp.1~24 (1997)
- Aghion, P., "Innovation and institutional ownership", American Economic Review, 103(1), pp.277~304 (2013)
- Albuquerque, A. M., "Peer choice in CEO compensation", Journal of Financial Economics, 108(1), pp.160~181 (2013)
- Anderson, M. C., "Are selling, general, and administrative costs "sticky"?", Journal of Accounting Research, 41, pp.47~63 (2003)
- Banker, R., "Equity incentives and long-term value created by SG&A expenditure", Contemporary Accounting Research, 28, pp.794~830 (2011)
- Beatty, A., "The spillover effect of fraudulent financial reporting on peer firms’ investments", Journal of Accounting and Economics, 55, pp.183~205 (2013)
- Bizjak, J. M., "Does the use of peer groups contribute to higher pay and less efficient compensation", Journal of Financial Economics, 90(2), pp.152~168 (2008)
- Charness, G., "Does pay inequality affect worker effort experimental evidence", Journal of Labor Economics, 25(4), pp.693~723 (2007)
- Demerjian, P., "Quantifying managerial ability : A new measure and validity tests", Management Science, 58(7), pp.1229~1248 (2012)
- Dougal, C., "Urban vibrancy and corporate growth", Journal of Finance, 70(1), pp.163~210 (2015)
- Finkelstein, S., "Strategic leadership: Top executives and their effects on organizations" (1996), West Publishing Company
- Francis, B., "Relative peer quality and firm performance", Journal of Financial Economics, 122(1), pp.196~219 (2016)
- Gong, G., "Relative performance evaluation and related peer groups in executive compensation contracts", The Accounting Review, 86(3), pp.1007~1043 (2011)
- Kaustia, M., "Social learning and corporate peer effects", Journal of Financial Economics, 117, pp.653~669 (2015)
- Lambert, R., "Executive compensation effects of large corporate acquisitions", Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 6, pp.231~243 (1987)
- Lazear, E. P., "Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts", Journal of Political Economy, 89, pp.841~864 (1981)
- Leary, M. T., "Do peer firms affect corporate financial policy", Journal of Finance, 69(1), pp.139~178 (2014)
- Lewbel, A., "Estimation of average treatment effects with misclassification", Econometrica, 75(2), pp.537~551 (2007)
- Rosenbaum, P. R., "The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects", Biometrika, 70(1), pp.41~55 (1983)
- Wu, J., "CEO stock option pay and R&D spending : A behavioral agency explanation", Journal of Business Research, 60, pp.482~492 (2007)