Foundation of Management Innovation and a Success Model of Micro Enterprise by Increasing Entrepreneurship and Organization Relationship Analysis
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
After the rapidly changing business management environment and financial crisis, high prices and domestic recession in Korea posed threats to the business survival of small and medium enterprises (SMEs). This paper looks at the potential of micro business owners for sustainable development: those who have a spirit of entrepreneurship and the potential to be a hidden champion. Our study of micro business values uses structure equation modeling by LISREL. We have done so in order to understand the foundation of management innovation and success model of micro enterprise by increasing the entrepreneurship and management performance relationship analysis. A micro-enterprise is a type of small business, found only in Korea, often registered as having ten or fewer employees. We examine the successful type of hidden champions and the influence of entrepreneurship on start-ups in business. As compared to past research on the SME entrepreneurship, this study segments small businesses even further. Small business entrepreneurship was classified into three forms that are most appropriate for the Korean situation today: innovation, risk-taking, and pro-activeness. This research is meaningful as it is Korea’s first empirical analysis on four business types: wholesale and retail sales, food and lodging business, service business, and manufacturing business. Thus far, research on small business entrepreneurship was carried out using small-scale investigative analysis. However, this research attempted to develop a model that can explain a cause-effect relation of the motivational level when it comes to the difference of entrepreneurship by each business type and small business start-up success factors. Various conceptual and operational definitions could be developed in a diverse and precise manner. Independent variables that are related to the success of small businesses can be developed additionally to examine the success factors related to the systematization in detailed manner. The research showed that the innovation, risk-taking and pro-activeness of the manifested difference in the degree of perception depending on the type of small businesses. Among the four business types, the ones that manifested the highest successful start-up rates were food, service, wholesale and retail sales and manufacturing. Results after conducting the regression analysis are shown on, which proves that the small business entrepreneurship exerts direct effect on the financial management performance of small businesses. In other words, small business entrepreneurship exerts a positive effect on the small business financial success and management performance. The R² value is 0.61. It is possible to know that the perception of systematization and variables on attitude explains the 61% of the success for small self-employed businesses management performance. We define start-up key factors that are helpful to achieve internal growth of firms by finding business survival strategies. The results also focus on Korean government policy for micro enterprise and small business support.
Abstract
After the rapidly changing business management environment and financial crisis, high prices and domestic recession in Korea posed threats to the business survival of small and medium enterprises (SMEs). This paper looks at the potential of micro business owners for sustainable development: those who have a spirit of entrepreneurship and the potential to be a hidden champion. Our study of micro business values uses structure equation modeling by LISREL. We have done so in order to understand the foundation of management innovation and success model of micro enterprise by increasing the entrepreneurship and management performance relationship analysis. A micro-enterprise is a type of small business, found only in Korea, often registered as having ten or fewer employees. We examine the successful type of hidden champions and the influence of entrepreneurship on start-ups in business. As compared to past research on the SME entrepreneurship, this study segments small businesses even further. Small business entrepreneurship was classified into three forms that are most appropriate for the Korean situation today: innovation, risk-taking, and pro-activeness. This research is meaningful as it is Korea’s first empirical analysis on four business types: wholesale and retail sales, food and lodging business, service business, and manufacturing business. Thus far, research on small business entrepreneurship was carried out using small-scale investigative analysis. However, this research attempted to develop a model that can explain a cause-effect relation of the motivational level when it comes to the difference of entrepreneurship by each business type and small business start-up success factors. Various conceptual and operational definitions could be developed in a diverse and precise manner. Independent variables that are related to the success of small businesses can be developed additionally to examine the success factors related to the systematization in detailed manner. The research showed that the innovation, risk-taking and pro-activeness of the manifested difference in the degree of perception depending on the type of small businesses. Among the four business types, the ones that manifested the highest successful start-up rates were food, service, wholesale and retail sales and manufacturing. Results after conducting the regression analysis are shown on, which proves that the small business entrepreneurship exerts direct effect on the financial management performance of small businesses. In other words, small business entrepreneurship exerts a positive effect on the small business financial success and management performance. The R² value is 0.61. It is possible to know that the perception of systematization and variables on attitude explains the 61% of the success for small self-employed businesses management performance. We define start-up key factors that are helpful to achieve internal growth of firms by finding business survival strategies. The results also focus on Korean government policy for micro enterprise and small business support.
참고문헌 (38)
- Audretsch, Thurik R., "A Model of the Entrepreneurial Economy. International", Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 2(2), pp.143~166 (2004)
- Baker, D. Rivers, "The Entrepreneurial Economy", A White Paper. The Micro Enterprise Journal, 3(1), pp.1~23 (2004)
- Bae, Jongtae, "Expansion and Vitalization of Entrepreneurship", Asia Pacific Journal of Small Business, 31(1), pp.111~128 (2009)
- Bae, Jongtae, "A Study on the Establishment of Korean StyleEntrepreneurship Model" (2009), Small and Medium BusinessAdministration
- BarNir, Anat, "Business Process Digitization, Strategy, and the Impact of Firm Age and Size : The Case of the Magazine Publishing Industry", Journal of Business Venturing, 18, pp.789~813 (2003)
- Baumol, W. J., "Entrepreneurship : Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive", Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), pp.893~921 (1990)
- Burns, T., "The Management of Innovation" (1966), Tavistok
- Blau, David M., "A Time-Series Analysis of Self-Employment", Journal of Political Economy, 95(3), pp.445~467 (1987)
- Caruana, A., "The Effect of Centralization and Formalization on Entrepreneurship in Export Firms", Journal of Small Business Management, 36, pp.16~29 (1998)
- Dennis, W., "Self-employment : When Nothing Else is Available?", Journal of Labor Research, 17(4), pp.645~661 (1996)
- Drucker, P. F., "Innovation and Entrepreneurship" (1985), Harper & Row
- Folster, Stefan, "Do lower taxes stimulate self-employment?", Small Business Economics, 19(2), pp.135~145 (2002)
- Gartner, W. B., "What Are We Talking about When We Talk about Entrepreneurship?", Journal of Business Venturing, 5, pp.15~28 (1990)
- Jeon, Byungchan, "Distribution of Small Businesses in Korea and CondensedMeaning", Asia Pacific Journal of Small Business, 22(1), pp.147~168 (2000)
- Jeon, Byungyoo, "A Study on the Decisive Factor when it comes to the Self-employed business selection", Labor Economy Journal, 26(3), pp.149~179 (2003)
- Small Business Systematization, Presentation of Model for Co-Working and Direction for Policy, "Jeon, Inwoo", Small and Medium Business Administration., ~ (2007)
- 김영민, "유통과학연구의 연구 동향 분석 : 창간호부터 제8권 3호까지를 중심으로", 유통과학연구, 8(4), pp.5~15 (2010), 한국유통과학회
- Park, Chunyeop, "A Study on the Satisfaction Level of Small Business Support Center’s Users", Asia Pacific Journal of Small Business, 22(1), pp.164~194 (2000)
- A Study on the Establishment and Operation ofEntrepreneurship Center, by the private and public sector, "Suh, Changsoo", Small and Medium Business Administration., ~ (2010)
- Suh, Geun-Ha, "An Empirical Study on the Critical Success of Recession-Resistant and Management Renovation in Small Retail Dealer : Korea Government Policy Suggestion", Asia Pacific Journal of Small Business, 29(4), pp.265~293 (2007)
- 서근하, "한국 재래시장상인의 창업가정신과 상품화 전략이 시장이미지와 경영성과에 미치는 영향과 재래시장 정책에 대한 시사점", 유통과학연구, 7(3), pp.71~100 (2009), 한국유통과학회
- 서근하, "영세 소상공인 조직화에 대한 직능업종별 차이분석과 경영성과", 유통과학연구, 9(2), pp.111~122 (2011), 한국유통과학회
- 서근하, "A Study on the Differences of Performance in Small Businesses by Gender", 유통과학연구, 9(3), pp.65~71 (2011), 한국유통과학회
- Kim, Jong-Il, "The Sources of Economic Growth of the East Asian Newly Industrialized Countries", Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 8, pp.235~271 (1994)
- Kirzner, I. M., "Entrepreneurial Discovery and the Competitive Market Process : An Austrian Approach", Journal of Economic Literature, 35, pp.60~85 (1997)
- Krueger, N. J., "Competing Model of Enrepreneurial Intentions", Journal of Business Venturing, 15, pp.411~432 (1998)
- Krueger, N. J., "The Cognitive Infrastructure of Opportunity Emergence", Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 1(1), pp.5~23 (2000)
- Lucas, Robert, "On the Size of Distribution of Business Firms", Bell Journal of Economic Journal, 9(2), pp.508~523 (1978)
- Lumpkin, G.T., "Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance", Academy of Management Review, 21(1), pp.135~172 (1996)
- OECD, ""FACT book," each year of 2000 - 2007", ~ (2009)
- Oliver, R. L., "Whence Consumer Loyalty", Journal of Marketing, 63(Special Issue), pp.33~44 (1999)
- Parker, Simon, "Explaining International Variations in Self-Employment: Evidence from a Panel of OECD Countries", Southern Economic Journal, 71(2), pp.287~301 (2004)
- A Harmonized Data Set of Business Ownership Rates in 23 OECD Countries, "Stel, A.", Scientific Analysis of Entrepreneurship & SMEs Research, 52~62, pp.Report H200302 (2003)
- Plan to Vitalize Traditional Market, "Small and Medium Business Administration", ~ (2009)
- Stevenson, H.H., "A Paradigm of Entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurial Management", Strategic Management Journal, 2, pp.17~27 (1990)
- Tayor, M., "Earnings. Independence or Unemployment: Why become Self-employed", Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 58(2), pp.253~265 (1996)
- 윤성욱, "한국의 소상공인 창업문화에 관한 연구 : 창업자 개인적 특성과 마케팅 인식을 중심으로", 소비문화연구, 6(1), pp.99~118 (2003), 한국소비문화학회
- 윤성욱, "한국 자영업의 경영혁신을 위한 성공요인에 관한 연구: 구조적 특성이 경영몰입과 성과에 미치는 영향", 소비문화연구, 11(2), pp.67~89 (2008), 한국소비문화학회