본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

엘리엇의 「번트 노턴」 읽기 - 물체의 진자운동과 원심력 운동의 구상화

Reading Eliot’s “Burnt Norton” by Way of the Motion of a Pendulum: the Embodiment of the Physical and Centrifugal Motion

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

Eliot’s Four Quartets is maybe the most difficult to understand in his poems. In spite of that, Four Quartets has been studied in many respects. We can see that Four Quartets is meditative, philosophical and abstractive, but after we read it through more carefully, we can understand its meaning very well. Eliot categorizes time into three in “Burnt Norton”; past, present, future. We can apply Eliot's time to a centripetal motion. In a centripetal motion, while the pendulums below (means all things which are in the world) change constantly and irregularly, a centripetal point doesn’t do so. For Eliot, the centripetal point is Word. That is, the way up and down is the same. The status which a centripetal point and a pendulum are harmonious with each other is “still point.” For example, Eliot embodies it; “present and past time are present in future time,” “what might have been and what has been point to one end.” etc. And for the purpose of representing still point, Eliot uses such images as “axle-tree, dance, rose-garden, darkness, words and love.” These images are key words in reading and appreciating Eliot’s “Burnt Norton.” Besides, to support these images, Eliot shows “destitution of all property,” “desiccation of the world of sense,” “inoperancy of the world of spirit.” Although Eliot defines time metaphysically and abstractively, we can recognize that he makes efforts to present time more visually and concretely.

Abstract

Eliot’s Four Quartets is maybe the most difficult to understand in his poems. In spite of that, Four Quartets has been studied in many respects. We can see that Four Quartets is meditative, philosophical and abstractive, but after we read it through more carefully, we can understand its meaning very well. Eliot categorizes time into three in “Burnt Norton”; past, present, future. We can apply Eliot's time to a centripetal motion. In a centripetal motion, while the pendulums below (means all things which are in the world) change constantly and irregularly, a centripetal point doesn’t do so. For Eliot, the centripetal point is Word. That is, the way up and down is the same. The status which a centripetal point and a pendulum are harmonious with each other is “still point.” For example, Eliot embodies it; “present and past time are present in future time,” “what might have been and what has been point to one end.” etc. And for the purpose of representing still point, Eliot uses such images as “axle-tree, dance, rose-garden, darkness, words and love.” These images are key words in reading and appreciating Eliot’s “Burnt Norton.” Besides, to support these images, Eliot shows “destitution of all property,” “desiccation of the world of sense,” “inoperancy of the world of spirit.” Although Eliot defines time metaphysically and abstractively, we can recognize that he makes efforts to present time more visually and concretely.

참고문헌 (17)

  1. 김경철, "『네 사중주』와 성경시학: 역사의 신화학", T. S. 엘리엇연구, 22(1), pp.1~31 (2012), 한국T.S.엘리엇학회[DOI]
  2. 서광원, "엘리엇의 『네 사중주』: 확장된 장미정원의 노래", T. S. 엘리엇연구, 19(2), pp.57~85 (2009), 한국T.S.엘리엇학회
  3. 손기표, "연금술과 ꡔ네 사중주ꡕ", T. S. 엘리엇연구, 23(2), pp.47~74 (2013), 한국T.S.엘리엇학회
  4. 이종철, "엘리엇의 『네 개의 사중주』(Four Quartets)에 있어서의 인식과 표현:불교, 음악과 포스트모던적 글쓰기", T. S. 엘리엇연구, 18(2), pp.155~184 (2008), 한국T.S.엘리엇학회
  5. 이창배, "T. S. 엘리엇 전집" (2001), 동국대학교 출판부
  6. 이철희, "헤라클레이토스의 공간원리와 엘리엇의 『네 사중주』", 현대영어영문학, 58(3), pp.171~188 (2014), 한국현대영어영문학회
  7. Arthur O, Lewis, "Eliot’s Four Quartets: Burnt Norton, IV", The Explicator, pp.1~3 (1949)
  8. Callow, James T, "Guide to American Literature : From Emily Dickinson to the Present" (1977), Barnes
  9. Cooper, John Xiros, "T. S. Eliot and the Ideology of “Four Quartets.”" (1995), Cambridge UP
  10. Dijk, Yra Van, "Reading the form: The Function of Typographic Blanks in Modern Poetry", Word & Image, 27(4), pp.407~415 (2011)
  11. Eliot, T. S., "The Complete Poems and Plays of T. S. Eliot" (1978), Faber
  12. Hargrove, Nancy, "Landscape as Symbol in the Poetry of T. S. Eliot" (1978), UP of Mississippi
  13. Levina, Jurate', "Speaking the Unnamable: A Phenomenology of Sense in T. S. Eliot's Four Quartets", Journal of Modern Literature, 36(3), pp.194~211 (2013)
  14. Quinn, Maire A., "T. S. Eliot: Four Quartets" (1982), Longman
  15. Rion, Rosanna, "T. S. Eliot's Ekphrastic Poems", Advances in Literary Study, 2(1), pp.31~37 (2014)
  16. Tamplin, Ronald, "A Preface to T. S. Eliot" (1995), Longman
  17. Warner, Martin, "Philosophical Poetry: The Case of Four Quartets", Philosophy and Literature, 10(2), pp.222~245 (1986)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (18건)