증권대차거래의 중개일원화를 위한 집중거래상대방 (Central Counterparty)제도의 도입에 관한 연구
A Study on the Adoption of Central Counterparty for an Integrated Brokerage in Securities Lending and Borrowing
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Securities lending plays an important role in supporting financial markets. For example, it can improve market liquidity, potentially reducing the cost of trading and increasing market efficiency. However, by increasing the interconnections between institutions, it can pose potential risks to financial stability, which are exacerbated by a lack of transparency in the securities lending market. Since the onset of the financial crisis in 2008, market participants have attempted to address some of these risks, and fundamental changes to market infrastructure are being discussed, such as the use of central counterparties (CCPs). Introduced in 2009 in both Europe and the US in collaboration with electronic trading platform providers, CCPs act as legal counterparties between lenders and borrowers and take responsibility for all the obligations related to securities lending transactions. Thus, CCPs mitigate the counterparty risk and the credit exposures for individual market participants and significantly reduce systemic risk for the market as a whole. That is,introducing a CCP into the market means that a lender has no credit exposure to a borrower and vice versa. This exposure is transferred to the CCP (or clearing member of the CCP). In principle, the standardization of counterparty credit risk through the CCP could facilitate wider market access to create the development of securities lending transactions. Lent securities would be delivered from the lender to borrower via their respective clearing members and the CCP. Collateral securities or cash would move in the opposite direction from the borrower to the CCP via the borrower's clearing member. Depending on the arrangements of the CCP,those collateral securities would be available to the lender in the event of the failure of the CCP. This is critical time for the securities lending industry as markets begin to recover from the credit crisis, transparency and risk management become imperatives, short sale and related lending practices come under unprecedented scrutiny and institutional investors re-examine the opportunities and risks inherent in securities lending. The author believes that the broad adoption of CCPs in securities lending is not only inevitable but provides a major opportunity to reduce systemic risk, increases participant earnings and reduces the industry's cost structure. This article recommends that any CCP should not limit the maximum trade size, offer transparent membership criteria for clearing and non-clearing members,accept both trades from all securities lending platforms and trades conducted bilaterally and so on.
Abstract
Securities lending plays an important role in supporting financial markets. For example, it can improve market liquidity, potentially reducing the cost of trading and increasing market efficiency. However, by increasing the interconnections between institutions, it can pose potential risks to financial stability, which are exacerbated by a lack of transparency in the securities lending market. Since the onset of the financial crisis in 2008, market participants have attempted to address some of these risks, and fundamental changes to market infrastructure are being discussed, such as the use of central counterparties (CCPs). Introduced in 2009 in both Europe and the US in collaboration with electronic trading platform providers, CCPs act as legal counterparties between lenders and borrowers and take responsibility for all the obligations related to securities lending transactions. Thus, CCPs mitigate the counterparty risk and the credit exposures for individual market participants and significantly reduce systemic risk for the market as a whole. That is,introducing a CCP into the market means that a lender has no credit exposure to a borrower and vice versa. This exposure is transferred to the CCP (or clearing member of the CCP). In principle, the standardization of counterparty credit risk through the CCP could facilitate wider market access to create the development of securities lending transactions. Lent securities would be delivered from the lender to borrower via their respective clearing members and the CCP. Collateral securities or cash would move in the opposite direction from the borrower to the CCP via the borrower's clearing member. Depending on the arrangements of the CCP,those collateral securities would be available to the lender in the event of the failure of the CCP. This is critical time for the securities lending industry as markets begin to recover from the credit crisis, transparency and risk management become imperatives, short sale and related lending practices come under unprecedented scrutiny and institutional investors re-examine the opportunities and risks inherent in securities lending. The author believes that the broad adoption of CCPs in securities lending is not only inevitable but provides a major opportunity to reduce systemic risk, increases participant earnings and reduces the industry's cost structure. This article recommends that any CCP should not limit the maximum trade size, offer transparent membership criteria for clearing and non-clearing members,accept both trades from all securities lending platforms and trades conducted bilaterally and so on.
참고문헌 (28)
- 증권대차시장의 발전방안, "김영도", 한국금융연구원, ~ (2011)
- Repoㆍ증권대차 발전방안 연구, "노무라종합연구소", 한국예탁결제원, ~ (2011)
- 박철영, "증권대차거래에 관한 법적 고찰", 증권법연구, 10(2), pp.183~217 (2009), 한국증권법학회
- 송치승, "증권대차거래의 동기와 투자전략", 증권예탁, (49) (2004), 한국예탁결제원
- 주식대차의 구조이해와 우리나라 주식대차제도의 개선방안, "송치승", 한국증권연구원, ~ (2003)
- 임재연, "자본시장법" (2012), 박영사
- 정승화, "유가증권대차거래제도의 발전과제", 증권예탁, (49) (2004), 한국예탁결제원
- 정찬형, "상법강의(상)(제15판)" (2012), 박영사
- 정찬형, "로스쿨 금융법" (2009), 박영사
- 증권예탁통계, "한국예탁결제원", 한국예탁결제원, ~ (2012)
- 허항진, "국제증권시장의 법과 실무" (2009), 세창출판사
- 황선웅, "주식대차거래와 자본시장 유동성", 金融工學硏究, 11(1), pp.83~104 (2012), 한국금융공학회
- 증권대차가 자본시장에 미치는 영향, "황선웅", 한국거래소, ~ (2011)
- Andrew Howieson, "Good, Bad or Inevitable?: The Introduction of CCPs in Securities Lending" (2010), Zimmerhansl Consulting Ltd. & Howieson Consulting Ltd.
- Bank of England, "Developments in the Global Securities Lending Market, Quarterly Bulletin 2011 Q3" (2011), Bank of England
- Citigroup, "Planning for the Future: The Role of a Central Counterparty in Securities Lending" (2011), Citigroup
- CPSS of the BIS, "Technical Committee of the IOSCO, Recommendation for Central Counterparties" (2004), BIS
- Clearstream International SA, "Automated Securities Lending Programme- Reporting Guide for ASL and ASLplus" (2012), Clearstream
- DTCC, "Central Counterparties: Development, Cooperation and Consolidation: A White Paper to the Industry on the Future of CCPs", DTCC (2000)
- ISLA, "Securities Lending: A Guide for Policymakers", ISLA, ~ (2012)
- ISLA, "A Central Counterparty in the European Equity Securities Lending Market", ISLA, ~ (2009)
- Jeremy C. Kress, "Credit Default Swaps, Clearinghouses, and Systemic Risk: Why Centralized Counterparties must Have Access to Central Bank Liquidity", Harv. J. on Legis, 48, pp.49~ (2011)
- Julia Lees Allen, "Derivatives and Clearinghouses and Systemic Risk: A Bankruptcy and Dodd-Frank Analysis", Stan. L. Rev, 64, pp.1079~ (2012)
- Paul M. McBride, "The Dodd-Frank Act and OTC Derivatives: The Impact of Mandatory Central Clearing on the Global OTC Derivatives Market", Int'l Lawyer, 44, pp.1077~ (2010)
- Technical Committee of CPSS and IOSCO, "Securities Lending Transactions: Market Development and Implication" (1999), BIS
- Thomas Lee Hazen, "The Law of Securities Regulation (Revised Fifth Edition)" (2006), Thomson West
- Repos and Securities Lending, "Tobias Adrian", Federal Reserve Bank of New York, ~, pp.Staff Report No. 529 (2011)
- Securities Lending and Repos: Market Overview and Financial Stability Issues, "WS5 Shadow Banking Task Force", ~ (2012)
