본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

골반내 종괴의 평가를 위한 악성 위험지수의효용성 및 한계

The effectiveness and limitations of the Risk of Malignancy Index in evaluation of adnexal masses

2

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류산부인과학

초록

목적 : 수술전 골반내 종괴의 악성 여부를 평가하는데 있어서 악성 위험지수 (RMI)의 효용성 및 한계를 알아보고자 하였다. 연구 방법 : 2000년 7월부터 2003년 12월까지 골반내 종괴를 주소로 내원한 환자 중 수술전 초음파 소견, 혈중 CA-125, 폐경 여부, 나이 및 수술 표본의 병리조직을 확인할 수 있었던 382명을 대상으로 후향적으로 시행하였다. 악성 위험지수 (RMI)는 초음파 소견, 혈중 CA-125 및 폐경 여부를 바탕으로 산출하였으며, 이를 통해 악성 위험지수의 민감도, 특이도, 양성 및 음성예측율을 비교하였다. 결과 : 악성 위험지수 (RMI2)는 민감도 57.1%, 특이도 93.3%, 양성 예측율 74.7%, 음성 예측율 86.3%로 골반내 종괴의 악성 여부를 평가하는데 있어 각각의 요소보다 통계학적으로 유의함을 보였지만, 경계성 암을 포함한 병기 1기암에서는 높은 위음성 (68.4%)의 한계를 보였다. 또한 기존의 알려진 악성 위험지수 (RMI1, RMI2, RMI3) 사이에는 통계학적으로 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았다. 결론 : 악성 위험지수 (RMI1, RMI2, RMI3)는 모두 수술전 골반내 종괴의 악성 여부를 평가하는데 효과적이며 무엇보다도 쉽고 간단하게 산출할 수 있어 개원가에게는 보다 전문화된 진료 및 치료를 위해 환자를 전원시키는데 지표가 될 수 있으며, 수술 일정이나 수술 방법 등의 치료방향을 결정하는데도 도움을 줄 것이다. 하지만 이 연구에서 보였던 경계성 암을 포함한 1기암의 높은 위음성의 한계를 극복하기 위해 보다 새로운 방법이 모색되어야 하리라 사료된다.

Abstract

Objective : The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and limitations of the Risk of Malignancy Index (RMI) for discriminating malignant from benign adnexal masses. Methods : This study was based on 382 women who have visited Korea University Hospital for surgical exploration of adnexal masses between July 2000 and December 2003. RMI was based on menopausal status, serum CA 125 levels, and ultrasound feature. A cutoff level of 200 was chosen as the threshold for discriminating malignant from benign adnexal masses. This setup was evaluated by sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) with respect to the ability to distinguish malignant from benign adnexal masses. Results : The sensitivity was 57.1%, specificity 93.3%, PPV 74.7% and NPV 86.3%. If stage I disease is considered “benign”, the sensitivity was 95.1%, specificity 89.3%, PPV 52.7%, and NPV 99.3%. The statistical significance of RMI over other factors was proven. However, it had limitations of high false negative rate (68.4%) in stage 1 ovarian malignancy including borderline malignancy. Moreover, its relationship with RMI1, RMI2, and RMI3 had no statistical significance. Concluson : RMI is a simple, easily applicable method for the primary evaluation of patients with adnexal masses and an effective method to selectively refer to an oncological unit for further management due to its relatively high specificity observed from this study. However this method has significant limitations in stage I ovarian malignancy including borderline malignancy. Other methods should be evaluated to increase the diagnostic accuracy.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. "Debulking and intervention surgery", 4(4), pp.17~22 (1993)
  2. "Misstaging of ovarian cancer", 65, pp.586~591 (1985)
  3. "Reasons for incomplete surgical staging in early ovarian carcinoma", 37, pp.3072~3076 (1990)
  4. "Preoperative serum CA-125 levels in patients with surgical stage I invasive ovarian adenocarcinoma", 80, pp.208~209 (1988)
  5. "TOvarian cancer screening. The use of serial complementary tumor markers to improve sensitivity and specificity for early detection", 76(10), pp.2092~2096 (1992)
  6. "Tumors in the lower pelvis as imaged by vaginal sonography", 37(2), pp.224~229 (1990)
  7. "A risk of malignancy index incorporating CA 125, ultrasound and menopausal status for the accurate preoperative diagnosis of ovarian cancer", 97, pp.922~999 (1990)
  8. ". Evaluation of risk of malignancy index based on serum CA 125, ultrasound findings and menopausal status in the preoperative diagnosis of pelvic masses", 103, pp.826~831 (1996)
  9. "The risk of malignancy index to evaluate potential ovarian cancers in local hospitals", 93, pp.448~452 (1999)
  10. "Preoperative evaluation of serum CA-125 levels in premenopausal and postmenopausal patients with pelvic mass:Discrimination ot benign from malignant disease", 159, pp.341~346 (1988)
  11. "Comparison of serum CA 125, clinical impression, and ultrasound in the preoperative evaluation of ovarian masses", 72, pp.659~664 (1988)
  12. "Serum CA 125 levels in preoperative evaluation of pelvic masses", 71, pp.751~756 (1988)
  13. "Familial ovarian cancer: a population- based case-control study", 128, pp.456~466 (1988)
  14. "The impact of subspecialty on the management of advanced ovarian cancer", 47, pp.203~209 (1992)
  15. "A radioimmunoassay using a monoclonal antibody to monitor the course of epithelial ovarian cancer", 309, pp.883~887 (1983)
  16. "Epithelial tumors of the ovary:CT findings and correlation with US", 178, pp.811~818 (1991)
  17. "Color Doppler ultrasound in the preoperative assessment of adnexal masses", 73, pp.637~641 (1994)
  18. "Pre-operative morphological and colour Doppler features of borderline ovarian tumours", 102, pp.990~996 (1995)
  19. "CA 125 measurement and ultrasonography in borderline tumors of the ovary", 183, pp.541~546 (2000)
  20. "New scoring system for prediction of ovarian malignancy based on transvaginal color Doppler sonography", 11, pp.631~638 (1992)
  21. "The status of ultrasound and color Doppler imaging for the early detection of ovarian carcinoma", 15(3), pp.265~269 (1997)
  22. "Evaluation of adnexal masses with transvaginal color ultrasound", 10(6), pp.295~297 (1991)
  23. "Limited contribution of Doppler velocimetry to the differential diagnosis of extrauterine pelvic tumors", 59, pp.405~408 (1995)
  24. "Controversies in assessment of ovarian tumors with transvaginal color Doppler ultrasound", 75, pp.316~329 (1996)
  25. "CComparison of two malignancy risk indices based on serum CA 125, ultrasound score, and menopausal status in the diagnosis of ovarian masses", 106, pp.524~527 (1999)
  26. "Comparison of Three Risk of Malignancy indices in Evaluation of Pelvic Masses", 81, pp.225~229 (2001)
  27. "The adnexal mass:benign or malignant? Evaluation of risk of malignancy index", 100, pp.927~931 (1993)
  28. "Risk of Malignancy Index in the preoperative evaluation of patients with adnexal masses", 90, pp.109~112 (2003)

관련 논문AI추천

Four risk of malignancy indices in evaluation of pelvic masses김경미, 김기원, 박정우, 박지현, 송은섭, 윤내리, 이병익, 이정훈, 정민재, 황성욱대한산부인과학회 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science2012 · 제55권 제09호Discrimination between Benign and Malignant Pelvic Masses Using the Risk of Malignancy Index 1김경미, 김기원, 박정우, 박지현, 송은섭, 윤내리, 이병익, 이정훈, 정민재, 황성욱대한폐경학회 · 대한폐경학회지2013 · 제19권 제1호Diagnostic Accuracy of the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm in Clinical Practice at a Single Hospital in Korea김민정, 박해일, 신재은, 이대우, 이해남대한진단검사의학회 · Annals of Laboratory Medicine2019 · 제39권 제3호난소종양으로 수술한 환자의 임상 조직학적 양상 및 수 술 전 CA 125의 의미구천회, 김창래, 손동우, 이지성, 전인상대한폐경학회 · 대한폐경학회지2013 · 제19권 제1호Comparison of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis ADNEX model and Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System with final histological diagnosis in adnexal masses: a retrospective studyAhmet Arif Filiz, Cemal Resat Atalay, Serkan Kahyaoglu대한산부인과학회 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science2024 · 제67권 제1호Clinical Usefulness of Cancer Antigen (CA) 125, Human Epididymis 4, and CA72-4 Levels and Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm Values for Diagnosing Ovarian Tumors in Korean Patients With and Without EndometriosisByung Su Kwon, Dong Soo Suh, Hyung-Hoi Kim, Jong-Kil Joo, Ki Hyung Kim, Kyung-Hwa Shin대한진단검사의학회 · Annals of Laboratory Medicine2020 · 제40권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (23건)