COMPARE THE ARCHITECTURAL DIFFERENCES IN THE BONY PELVIS OF KOREAN WOMEN AND THEIR ASSOCIATION WITH THE MODE OF DELIVERY BY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective We investigated the structural differences in the pelvic bone architecture of Korean women and their association with the mode of delivery by performing computed tomography (CT) pelvimetry. Methods This study was conducted on 175 women who underwent CT between March of 2006 and May of 2008. For making an objective assessment, one specialist in obsterics and gynecology measured the obstetrical conjugate, the true conjugate and the diagonal conjugate on the sagittal plane and the transverse diameter, the intertuberous diameter and the interspinous diameter on the coronal plane. The patients who underwent total hysterectomy or those who had a disease of the uterus were excluded from the current analysis. Results A total of 175 Korean women were examined, and their ages ranged from 20 to 50 years. The mean age was 37.6 ± 7.4 years. The interspinous diameter that was measured on CT scans was 94.6 ± 7.8 mm in the vaginal delivery group (n=84) and this was 90.9 ± 6.6 mm in the cesarean section group (n=20). This difference reached statistical signifi cance. Conclusion Our study examined the difference in the pelvic architecture with using CT and we found that the interspinous diameter can be the important determinant that affects normal vaginal delivery. Of these pelvimetric parameters, a wider interspinous diameter was signifi cantly associated with vaginal delivery. Multi-displinary approaches are warranted to examine this relation with regard to the various factors that are involved in delivery.
Abstract
Objective We investigated the structural differences in the pelvic bone architecture of Korean women and their association with the mode of delivery by performing computed tomography (CT) pelvimetry. Methods This study was conducted on 175 women who underwent CT between March of 2006 and May of 2008. For making an objective assessment, one specialist in obsterics and gynecology measured the obstetrical conjugate, the true conjugate and the diagonal conjugate on the sagittal plane and the transverse diameter, the intertuberous diameter and the interspinous diameter on the coronal plane. The patients who underwent total hysterectomy or those who had a disease of the uterus were excluded from the current analysis. Results A total of 175 Korean women were examined, and their ages ranged from 20 to 50 years. The mean age was 37.6 ± 7.4 years. The interspinous diameter that was measured on CT scans was 94.6 ± 7.8 mm in the vaginal delivery group (n=84) and this was 90.9 ± 6.6 mm in the cesarean section group (n=20). This difference reached statistical signifi cance. Conclusion Our study examined the difference in the pelvic architecture with using CT and we found that the interspinous diameter can be the important determinant that affects normal vaginal delivery. Of these pelvimetric parameters, a wider interspinous diameter was signifi cantly associated with vaginal delivery. Multi-displinary approaches are warranted to examine this relation with regard to the various factors that are involved in delivery.
참고문헌 (9)
- Nichols DH, "Vaginal surgery. 4th" (1996), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
- Federle MP, "Pelvimetry by digital radiography: a low-dose examination", Radiology, 143, pp.733~735 (1982)
- Gimovsky ML, "X-ray pelvimetry in a breech protocol: a comparison of digital radiography and conventional methods", Am J Obstet Gynecol, pp.887~888 (1985)
- Hankins GDV, "Operative obstetrics" (1995), Appleton & Lange
- Speroff L, "Clinical gynecologic endocrinology and infertility. 7th ed" (2005), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
- Cunningham FG, "Williams obstetrics" (2010), McGraw-Hill
- Anderson N, "Measurement error in computed tomography pelvimetry", Australas Radiol, 49, pp.104~107 (2005)
- Park KH, "A clinical study of X-ray pelvimetry", Korean J Obstet Gynecol, 25, pp.87~95 (1982)
- Pattinson RC, "Pelvimetry for fetal cephalic presentations at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000;(2):CD000161", ~ (2000)
