Comparison of midurethral sling outcomes with and without concomitant prolapse repair
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
ObjectiveWe compared the outcomes of the midurethral sling (MUS) with and without concomitant prolapse repair. MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of 203 women who underwent MUS at Severance Hospital from January 2009 to April 2012 with and without concomitant prolapse repair. Patients completed the urogenital distress inventory questionnaire preoperatively and postoperatively. The outcomes were assessed by using validated questionnaires and reviewing medical records. McNemar’s test, t-test, and multiple logistic regression were used for analysis. ResultsWe noted that women who underwent MUS alone were more likely to experience urinary frequency (12% vs. 25%, P = 0.045), urgency (6% vs. 24%, P< 0.001), and bladder emptying difficulty (2% vs. 10%, P = 0.029) compared to those who underwent concomitant repair. Women who only MUS were more likely to experience discomfort in the lower abdominal or genital region compared to those who than those who underwent concomitant repair; however, the difference was not significant (5% vs. 11%, P = 0.181). In the MUS only group, maximal cystometric capacity (MCC) was a significant parameter of preoperative and postoperative urinary frequency (P = 0.042; odds ratio, 0.994; P = 0.020; odds ratio, 0.993), whereas the Valsalva leak point pressure (VLPP) was a significant factor of postoperative bladder emptying difficulty (P=0.047; odds ratio, 0.970). ConclusionThe outcomes did not differ between patients who underwent MUS alone and those with concomitant repair. In the MUS only group, MCC and VLPP were significant urodynamics study parameters related to urinary outcome.
Abstract
ObjectiveWe compared the outcomes of the midurethral sling (MUS) with and without concomitant prolapse repair. MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of 203 women who underwent MUS at Severance Hospital from January 2009 to April 2012 with and without concomitant prolapse repair. Patients completed the urogenital distress inventory questionnaire preoperatively and postoperatively. The outcomes were assessed by using validated questionnaires and reviewing medical records. McNemar’s test, t-test, and multiple logistic regression were used for analysis. ResultsWe noted that women who underwent MUS alone were more likely to experience urinary frequency (12% vs. 25%, P = 0.045), urgency (6% vs. 24%, P< 0.001), and bladder emptying difficulty (2% vs. 10%, P = 0.029) compared to those who underwent concomitant repair. Women who only MUS were more likely to experience discomfort in the lower abdominal or genital region compared to those who than those who underwent concomitant repair; however, the difference was not significant (5% vs. 11%, P = 0.181). In the MUS only group, maximal cystometric capacity (MCC) was a significant parameter of preoperative and postoperative urinary frequency (P = 0.042; odds ratio, 0.994; P = 0.020; odds ratio, 0.993), whereas the Valsalva leak point pressure (VLPP) was a significant factor of postoperative bladder emptying difficulty (P=0.047; odds ratio, 0.970). ConclusionThe outcomes did not differ between patients who underwent MUS alone and those with concomitant repair. In the MUS only group, MCC and VLPP were significant urodynamics study parameters related to urinary outcome.
참고문헌 (20)
- Botlero R, "Prevalence and incidence of urinary incontinence in women: review of the literature and investigation of methodological issues", Int J Urol, 15, pp.230~234 (2008)
- Keyock KL, "Understanding stress urinary incontinence", Nurse Pract, 36, pp.24~36 (2011)
- Novara G, "Complication rates of tension-free midurethral slings in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing tension-free midurethral tapes to other surgical procedures and different devices", Eur Urol, 53, pp.288~308 (2008)
- Novara G, "Tension-free midurethral slings in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of effectiveness", Eur Urol, 52, pp.663~678 (2007)
- Bai SW, "Relationship between stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse", Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct, 13, pp.256~260 (2002)
- Richter HE, "Lower urinary tract symptoms, quality of life and pelvic organ prolapse: irritative bladder and obstructive voiding symptoms in women planning to undergo abdominal sacrocolpopexy for advanced pelvic organ prolapse", J Urol, 178(3 Pt 1), pp.965~969 (2007)
- Anger JT, "The effect of concomitant prolapse repair on sling outcomes", J Urol, 180, pp.1003~1006 (2008)
- Schraffordt Koops SE, "Result of the tension-free vaginal tape in patients with concomitant prolapse surgery: a 2-year follow-up study: an analysis from the Netherlands TVT database", Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct, 18, pp.437~442 (2007)
- Lo TS, "Tension-free vaginal tape procedures in women with stress urinary incontinence with and without coexisting genital prolapse", Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 16, pp.399~404 (2004)
- Huang KH, "Concomitant pelvic organ prolapse surgery with TVT procedure", Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct, 17, pp.60~65 (2006)
- Partoll LM, "Efficacy of tension-free vaginal tape with other pelvic reconstructive surgery", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 186, pp.1292~1295 (2002)
- Sokol AI, "Incidence and predictors of prolonged urinary retention after TVT with and without concurrent prolapse surgery", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 192, pp.1537~1543 (2005)
- Yip SK, "Tension-free vaginal tape sling procedure for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in Hong Kong women with and without pelvic organ prolapse: 1-year outcome study", Hong Kong Med J, 12, pp.15~20 (2006)
- Kilicarslan H, "Predictors of outcome after in situ anterior vaginal wall sling surgery", Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct, 14, pp.339~341 (2003)
- Costantini E, "Preoperative Valsalva leak point pressure may not predict outcome of mid-urethral slings:analysis from a randomized controlled trial of retropubic versus transobturator mid-urethral slings", Int Braz J Urol, 34, pp.73~81 (2008)
- Kaplan SA, "Prospective analysis of 373 consecutive women with stress urinary incontinence treated with a vaginal wall sling: the Columbia-Cornell University experience", J Urol, 164, pp.1623~1627 (2000)
- 조성태, "Predictors of Postoperative Voiding Dysfunction following Transobsturator Sling Procedures in Patients with Stress Urinary Incontinence", International Neurourology Journal, 14(1), pp.26~33 (2010), 대한배뇨장애요실금학회
- Harris N, "Can maximum urethral closure pressure (MUCP) be used to predict outcome of surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence?", Neurourol Urodyn, 30, pp.1609~1612 (2011)
- Meschia M, "Tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) for treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women with low-pressure urethra", Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 122, pp.118~121 (2005)
- Spinosa JP, "Suburethral sling inserted by the transobturator route in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: preliminary results in 117 cases", Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 123, pp.212~217 (2005)