Hyperplastic primary vitreous with hemorrhage manifested as a hyperechoic mass in the fetal orbit by prenatal ultrasound in a case of isolated unilateral microphthalmia
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Congenital microphthalmia is a rare anomaly of the fetal orbit resulting from developmental defects of the primary optic vesicle. Chromosomal anomalies, genetic defect, infection, and prenatal drug exposure are the most common causes. Congenital microphthalmia is usually associated with other abnormalities, and cases of isolated microphthalmia are rarely reported. Congenital microphthalmia can be diagnosed by prenatal ultrasound by measuring the axial diameter of the eye ball, but the accuracy depends on fetal position and associated anomalies. We report a case of an isolated unilateral microphthalmia which was not diagnosed by prenatal ultrasound, because the only abnormal prenatal ultrasound finding was a small hyperechoic mass lesion in the eye ball and the subsequent scan of the orbits was limited due to fetal prone position. The hyperechoic mass lesion in the eye ball was finally diagnosed as a persistent hyperplastic primary vitreous with hemorrhage by neonatal magnetic resonance image.
Abstract
Congenital microphthalmia is a rare anomaly of the fetal orbit resulting from developmental defects of the primary optic vesicle. Chromosomal anomalies, genetic defect, infection, and prenatal drug exposure are the most common causes. Congenital microphthalmia is usually associated with other abnormalities, and cases of isolated microphthalmia are rarely reported. Congenital microphthalmia can be diagnosed by prenatal ultrasound by measuring the axial diameter of the eye ball, but the accuracy depends on fetal position and associated anomalies. We report a case of an isolated unilateral microphthalmia which was not diagnosed by prenatal ultrasound, because the only abnormal prenatal ultrasound finding was a small hyperechoic mass lesion in the eye ball and the subsequent scan of the orbits was limited due to fetal prone position. The hyperechoic mass lesion in the eye ball was finally diagnosed as a persistent hyperplastic primary vitreous with hemorrhage by neonatal magnetic resonance image.
참고문헌 (15)
- Ragge NK., "A practical guide to the management of anophthalmia and microphthalmia", Eye(Lond), 21, pp.1290~1300 (2007)
- Kallen B., "The epidemiology of anophthalmia and microphthalmia in Sweden", Eur J Epidemiol, 20, pp.345~350 (2005)
- Morrison D., "National study of microphthalmia, anophthalmia, and coloboma(MAC)in Scotland : investigation of genetic aetiology", J Med Genet, 39, pp.16~22 (2002)
- Verma AS., "Anophthalmia and microphthalmia", Orphanet J Rare Dis, 2, pp.47~ (2007)
- Stoll C., "Associated malformations among infants with anophthalmia and microphthalmia", Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol, 94, pp.147~152 (2012)
- Nishina S., "Survey of microphthalmia in Japan", Jpn J Ophthalmol, 56, pp.198~202 (2012)
- Warburg M., "Classification of microphthalmos and coloboma", J Med Genet, 30, pp.664~669 (1993)
- Mashiach R., "Early sonographic detection of recurrent fetal eye anomalies", Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 24, pp.640~643 (2004)
- Kivilevitch Z., "Fetal interlens distance : normal values during pregnancy", Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 36, pp.186~190 (2010)
- Bronshtein M., "First-and second-trimester diagnosis of fetal ocular defects and associated anomalies : report of eight cases", Obstet Gynecol, 77, pp.443~449 (1991)
- Jeanty P., "Fetal ocular biometry by ultrasound", Radiology, 143, pp.513~516 (1982)
- Fuhrmann S., "Eye morphogenesis and patterning of the optic vesicle", Curr Top Dev Biol, 93, pp.61~84 (2010)
- Bardakjian TM., "The genetics of anophthalmia and microphthalmia", Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 22, pp.309~313 (2011)
- Gonzalez-Rodriguez J., "Mutational screening of CHX10, GDF6, OTX2, RAX and SOX2 genes in 50 unrelated microphthalmiaanophthalmia-coloboma(MAC)spectrum cases", Br J Ophthalmol, 94, pp.1100~1104 (2010)
- Palano GM., "Microphthalmia due to congenital varicella infection : a case report", Minerva Pediatr, 57, pp.433~439 (2005)