본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Learning curve analysis of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for gynecologic oncologists without open counterpart experience

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류산부인과학

초록

Objective To evaluate the learning curve of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) for gynecologic oncologists who underwentresidency- and fellowship-training on laparoscopic surgery without previous experience in performing abdominal radicalhysterectomy (ARH). Methods We retrospectively reviewed 84 patients with FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) stage IB cervicalcancer who underwent LRH (Piver type III) between April 2006 and March 2014. The patients were divided into two groups(surgeon A group, 42 patients; surgeon B group, 42 patients) according to the surgeon with or without ARH experience. Clinico-pathologic data were analyzed between the 2 groups. Operating times were analyzed using the cumulative sumtechnique. Results The operating time in surgeon A started at 5 to 10 standard deviations of mean operating time and afterward steeplydecreased with operative experience (Pearson correlation coefficient=-0.508, P=0.001). Surgeon B, however, showed a gentleslope of learning curve within 2 standard deviations of mean operating time (Pearson correlation coefficient=-0.225, P=0.152). Approximately 18 cases for both surgeons were required to achieve surgical proficiency for LRH. Multivariate analysis showedthat tumor size (>4 cm) was significantly associated with increased operating time (P=0.027; odds ratio, 4.667; 95% confidenceinterval, 1.187 to 18.352). Conclusion After completing the residency- and fellowship-training course on gynecologic laparoscopy, gynecologic oncologists, evenwithout ARH experience, might reach an acceptable level of surgical proficiency in LRH after approximately 20 cases andshowed a gentle slope of learning curve, taking less effort to initially perform LRH.

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the learning curve of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) for gynecologic oncologists who underwentresidency- and fellowship-training on laparoscopic surgery without previous experience in performing abdominal radicalhysterectomy (ARH). Methods We retrospectively reviewed 84 patients with FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) stage IB cervicalcancer who underwent LRH (Piver type III) between April 2006 and March 2014. The patients were divided into two groups(surgeon A group, 42 patients; surgeon B group, 42 patients) according to the surgeon with or without ARH experience. Clinico-pathologic data were analyzed between the 2 groups. Operating times were analyzed using the cumulative sumtechnique. Results The operating time in surgeon A started at 5 to 10 standard deviations of mean operating time and afterward steeplydecreased with operative experience (Pearson correlation coefficient=-0.508, P=0.001). Surgeon B, however, showed a gentleslope of learning curve within 2 standard deviations of mean operating time (Pearson correlation coefficient=-0.225, P=0.152). Approximately 18 cases for both surgeons were required to achieve surgical proficiency for LRH. Multivariate analysis showedthat tumor size (>4 cm) was significantly associated with increased operating time (P=0.027; odds ratio, 4.667; 95% confidenceinterval, 1.187 to 18.352). Conclusion After completing the residency- and fellowship-training course on gynecologic laparoscopy, gynecologic oncologists, evenwithout ARH experience, might reach an acceptable level of surgical proficiency in LRH after approximately 20 cases andshowed a gentle slope of learning curve, taking less effort to initially perform LRH.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. Pomel C., "Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for invasive cervical cancer : 8-year experience of a pilot study", Gynecol Oncol, 91, pp.534~539 (2003)
  2. Puntambekar SP., "Laparoscopic total radical hysterectomy by the Pune technique : our experience of 248 cases", J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 14, pp.682~689 (2007)
  3. Nam JH., "Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer : long-term survival outcomes in a matched cohort study", Ann Oncol, 23, pp.903~911 (2012)
  4. Choi CH., "Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer", Ann Surg Oncol, 19, pp.3839~3848 (2012)
  5. Magrina JF., "Robotic radical hysterectomy : comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy", Gynecol Oncol, 109, pp.86~91 (2008)
  6. Cantrell LA., "Survival outcomes for women undergoing type III robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer : a 3-year experience", Gynecol Oncol, 117, pp.260~265 (2010)
  7. Sert MB., "Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy : comparison with total laparoscopic hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy; one surgeon’s experience at the Norwegian Radium Hospital", Gynecol Oncol, 121, pp.600~604 (2011)
  8. Tinelli R., "Robotics versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer : a multicenter study", Ann Surg Oncol, 18, pp.2622~2628 (2011)
  9. Vickers AJ., "The surgical learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy : a retrospective cohort study", Lancet Oncol, 10, pp.475~480 (2009)
  10. Reade C., "Characterizing the learning curve for laparoscopic radical hysterectomy : buddy operating as a technique for accelerating skill acquisition", Int J Gynecol Cancer, 21, pp.930~935 (2011)
  11. Hwang JH., "Learning curve analysis of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymph node dissection in early cervical cancer", Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 163, pp.219~223 (2012)
  12. Stolzenburg JU., "Modular training for residents with no prior experience with open pelvic surgery in endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy", Eur Urol, 49, pp.491~498 (2006)
  13. Williams SM., "Quality control : an application of the cusum", BMJ, 23(304), pp.1359~1361 (1992)
  14. Bae JW., "Laparoscopic lymphadenectomy for gynecologic malignancies : evaluation of the surgical approach and outcomes over a seven-year experience", Arch Gynecol Obstet, 285, pp.823~829 (2012)
  15. Bokhari MB., "Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery", Surg Endosc, 25, pp.855~860 (2011)
  16. Steed H., "A comparison of laparascopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and radical abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer", Gynecol Oncol, 93, pp.588~593 (2004)

관련 논문AI추천

Impact of the Learning Curve on the Survival of Abdominal or Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer김상운, 김성훈, 김영태, 남은지, 박선희, 이정연, Lan Ying Wen, LI LANYING대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2021 · 제53권 제1호The comparison of surgical outcomes and learning curves of radical hysterectomy by laparoscopy and robotic system for cervical cancer: an experience of a single surgeon김성민, 민경진, 송재윤, 이낙우, 이상훈, 이재관, 허윤정, 홍진화대한산부인과학회 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science2018 · 제61권 제4호Comparative Effectiveness of Abdominal versus Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer in the Postdissemination Era김경주, 김기동, 김재원, 김진희, 박서진, 이정윤, 임명철대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2019 · 제51권 제2호Surgical time in gynecologic surgery using laparoscopic articulated instruments (KGOG 4002)Ha Kyun Chang, Hyunjoon Im, Jeong-Yeol Park, Jong Ha Hwang, Kidong Kim, Min Kyung Kim, Seok Ju Seong, Soyeon Ahn대한산부인과학회 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science2025 · 제68권 제5호Perioperative Complications of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery Using Three Robotic Arms at a Single Institution김상운, 김성훈, 김영태, 남은지, 임가원연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2015 · 제56권 제2호Surgical and obstetrical outcomes after laparoscopic radical trachelectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for early cervical cancer김미경, 김선아, 김태진, 소경아, 유소은, 이기헌, 이유경, 이인호대한산부인과학회 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science2016 · 제59권 제5호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)