Robotic-assisted interval cytoreductive surgery in ovarian cancer: a feasibility study
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
ObjectiveThe primary objective was to assess the feasibility of robotic-assisted interval cytoreductive surgery for achievingcomplete cytoreduction for patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer. The secondary objective was to examine theperioperative outcomes. MethodsA retrospective study of 12 patients with stage IIIC or IV ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal carcinomawho underwent interval cytoreductive surgery after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. ResultsOptimal cytoreduction was achieved in 100% of selected patients. Complete cytoreductive surgery was achievedin 75% of patients. The estimated mean blood loss was 100 mL. The median length of hospital stay was 2 days. Perioperative complication and 30-day readmission rates were 8.3% (1 patient). The median follow-up time was9.5 months. ConclusionRobotic-assisted interval cytoreductive surgery in ovarian cancer is safe and feasible and may be an alternative tostandard laparotomy in selected patients.
Abstract
ObjectiveThe primary objective was to assess the feasibility of robotic-assisted interval cytoreductive surgery for achievingcomplete cytoreduction for patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer. The secondary objective was to examine theperioperative outcomes. MethodsA retrospective study of 12 patients with stage IIIC or IV ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal carcinomawho underwent interval cytoreductive surgery after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. ResultsOptimal cytoreduction was achieved in 100% of selected patients. Complete cytoreductive surgery was achievedin 75% of patients. The estimated mean blood loss was 100 mL. The median length of hospital stay was 2 days. Perioperative complication and 30-day readmission rates were 8.3% (1 patient). The median follow-up time was9.5 months. ConclusionRobotic-assisted interval cytoreductive surgery in ovarian cancer is safe and feasible and may be an alternative tostandard laparotomy in selected patients.
참고문헌 (31)
- Siegel RL, "Cancer statistics, 2019", CA Cancer J Clin, 69, pp.7~34 (2019)
- Vergote I, "Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary surgery in stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer", N Engl J Med, 363, pp.943~953 (2010)
- Kehoe S, "Primary chemotherapy versus primary surgery for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer(CHORUS) : an open-label, randomised, controlled, noninferiority trial", Lancet, 386, pp.249~257 (2015)
- Onda T, "Comparison of treatment invasiveness between upfront debulking surgery versus interval debulking surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage III", IV ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal cancers in a phase III randomised trial : Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0602, 2016, pp.64, 22~31
- Vergote I, "Neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus debulking surgery in advanced tubo-ovarian cancers : pooled analysis of individual patient data from the EORTC 55971 and CHORUS trials", Lancet Oncol, 19, pp.1680~1687 (2018)
- Wright AA, "Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer : Society of Gynecologic Oncology and American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline", J Clin Oncol, 34, pp.3460~3473 (2016)
- Chang SJ, "Evolution of surgical treatment paradigms for advanced-stage ovarian cancer : redefining ‘optimal’residual disease", Gynecol Oncol, 125, pp.483~492 (2012)
- Hamilton CA, "Clinicopathologic characteristics associated with long-term survival in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer : an NRG Oncology", Gynecologic Oncology Group ancillary data study, 2018, pp.148, 275~280
- Schorge JO, "Meigs to modern times : the evolution of debulking surgery in advanced ovarian cancer", Gynecol Oncol, 149, pp.447~454 (2018)
- Fagotti A, "Phase III randomised clinical trial comparing primary surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer with high tumour load(SCORPION trial) : final analysis of perioperative outcome", Eur J Cancer, 59, pp.22~33 (2016)
- Melamed A, "Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for debulking ovarian cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy", Obstet Gynecol, 129, pp.861~869 (2017)
- Gueli Alletti S, "Minimally invasive interval debulking surgery in ovarian neoplasm(MISSION trial-NCT02324595) : a feasibility study", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 214, pp.503.e1~503.e6 (2016)
- "National Comprehensive Cancer Network’s practice guidelines in oncology. Ovarian cancer" (2018)[URL]
- Ergina PL, "Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation", Lancet, 374, pp.1097~1104 (2009)
- Garas G, "Network analysis of surgical innovation : measuring value and the virality of diffusion in robotic surgery", PLoS One, 12, pp.e0183332~ (2017)
- Rutten MJ, "Laparoscopy to predict the result of primary cytoreductive surgery in patients with advanced ovarian cancer : a randomized controlled trial", J Clin Oncol, 35, pp.613~621 (2017)
- Böhm S, "Chemotherapy response score : development and validation of a system to quantify histopathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma", J Clin Oncol, 33, pp.2457~2463 (2015)
- Nelson G, "Guidelines for pre-and intra-operative care in gynecologic", oncology surgery : Enhanced Recovery After Surgery(ERAS®)Society recommendations--part I, 2016, pp.140, 313~322
- Nelson G, "Guidelines for postoperative care in gynecologic", oncology surgery : Enhanced Recovery After Surgery(ERAS®)Society recommendations--part II, 2016, pp.140, 323~332
- Aletti GD, "A new frontier for quality of care in gynecologic oncology surgery : multi-institutional assessment of short-term outcomes for ovarian cancer using a risk-adjusted model", Gynecol Oncol, 107, pp.99~106 (2007)
- Lucidi A, "Role of robotic surgery in ovarian malignancy", Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 45, pp.74~82 (2017)
- Magrina JF, "Robotic approach for ovarian cancer : perioperative and survival results and comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy", Gynecol Oncol, 121, pp.100~105 (2011)
- Nezhat FR, "Comparison of perioperative outcomes and complication rates between conventional versus robotic-assisted laparoscopy in the evaluation and management of early, advanced, and recurrent stage ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer", Int J Gynecol Cancer, 24, pp.600~607 (2014)
- Feuer GA, "Perioperative and clinical outcomes in the management of epithelial ovarian cancer using a robotic or abdominal approach", Gynecol Oncol, 131, pp.520~524 (2013)
- Ackroyd SA, "Interval robotic cytoreduction following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer", J Robot Surg, 12, pp.245~250 (2018)
- Tozzi R, "Interval laparoscopic en-bloc resection of the pelvis(L-EnBRP)in patients with stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancer : description of the technique and surgical outcomes", Gynecol Oncol, 142, pp.477~483 (2016)
- Favero G, "Oncologic concerns regarding laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery in patients with advanced ovarian cancer submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy", Oncology, 89, pp.159~166 (2015)
- Corrado G, "Laparoscopic debulking surgery in the management of advanced ovarian cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy", Int J Gynecol Cancer, 25, pp.1253~1257 (2015)
- Cardenas-Goicoechea J, "Minimally invasive interval cytoreductive surgery in ovarian cancer : systematic review and meta-analysis", J Robot Surg, 13, pp.23~33 (2019)
- Brown J, "When less is more : minimally invasive surgery compared with laparotomy for interval debulking after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with advanced ovarian cancer", J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 26, pp.902~909 (2019)
- Fagotti A, "The INTERNATIONAL MISSION study : minimally invasive surgery in ovarian neoplasms after neoadjuvant chemotherapy", Int J Gynecol Cancer, 29, pp.5~9 (2019)
