본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Robotic-assisted interval cytoreductive surgery in ovarian cancer: a feasibility study

2

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류산부인과학

초록

ObjectiveThe primary objective was to assess the feasibility of robotic-assisted interval cytoreductive surgery for achievingcomplete cytoreduction for patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer. The secondary objective was to examine theperioperative outcomes. MethodsA retrospective study of 12 patients with stage IIIC or IV ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal carcinomawho underwent interval cytoreductive surgery after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. ResultsOptimal cytoreduction was achieved in 100% of selected patients. Complete cytoreductive surgery was achievedin 75% of patients. The estimated mean blood loss was 100 mL. The median length of hospital stay was 2 days. Perioperative complication and 30-day readmission rates were 8.3% (1 patient). The median follow-up time was9.5 months. ConclusionRobotic-assisted interval cytoreductive surgery in ovarian cancer is safe and feasible and may be an alternative tostandard laparotomy in selected patients.

Abstract

ObjectiveThe primary objective was to assess the feasibility of robotic-assisted interval cytoreductive surgery for achievingcomplete cytoreduction for patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer. The secondary objective was to examine theperioperative outcomes. MethodsA retrospective study of 12 patients with stage IIIC or IV ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal carcinomawho underwent interval cytoreductive surgery after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. ResultsOptimal cytoreduction was achieved in 100% of selected patients. Complete cytoreductive surgery was achievedin 75% of patients. The estimated mean blood loss was 100 mL. The median length of hospital stay was 2 days. Perioperative complication and 30-day readmission rates were 8.3% (1 patient). The median follow-up time was9.5 months. ConclusionRobotic-assisted interval cytoreductive surgery in ovarian cancer is safe and feasible and may be an alternative tostandard laparotomy in selected patients.

참고문헌 (31)

  1. Siegel RL, "Cancer statistics, 2019", CA Cancer J Clin, 69, pp.7~34 (2019)
  2. Vergote I, "Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary surgery in stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer", N Engl J Med, 363, pp.943~953 (2010)
  3. Kehoe S, "Primary chemotherapy versus primary surgery for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer(CHORUS) : an open-label, randomised, controlled, noninferiority trial", Lancet, 386, pp.249~257 (2015)
  4. Onda T, "Comparison of treatment invasiveness between upfront debulking surgery versus interval debulking surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage III", IV ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal cancers in a phase III randomised trial : Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0602, 2016, pp.64, 22~31
  5. Vergote I, "Neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus debulking surgery in advanced tubo-ovarian cancers : pooled analysis of individual patient data from the EORTC 55971 and CHORUS trials", Lancet Oncol, 19, pp.1680~1687 (2018)
  6. Wright AA, "Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer : Society of Gynecologic Oncology and American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline", J Clin Oncol, 34, pp.3460~3473 (2016)
  7. Chang SJ, "Evolution of surgical treatment paradigms for advanced-stage ovarian cancer : redefining ‘optimal’residual disease", Gynecol Oncol, 125, pp.483~492 (2012)
  8. Hamilton CA, "Clinicopathologic characteristics associated with long-term survival in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer : an NRG Oncology", Gynecologic Oncology Group ancillary data study, 2018, pp.148, 275~280
  9. Schorge JO, "Meigs to modern times : the evolution of debulking surgery in advanced ovarian cancer", Gynecol Oncol, 149, pp.447~454 (2018)
  10. Fagotti A, "Phase III randomised clinical trial comparing primary surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer with high tumour load(SCORPION trial) : final analysis of perioperative outcome", Eur J Cancer, 59, pp.22~33 (2016)
  11. Melamed A, "Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for debulking ovarian cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy", Obstet Gynecol, 129, pp.861~869 (2017)
  12. Gueli Alletti S, "Minimally invasive interval debulking surgery in ovarian neoplasm(MISSION trial-NCT02324595) : a feasibility study", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 214, pp.503.e1~503.e6 (2016)
  13. "National Comprehensive Cancer Network’s practice guidelines in oncology. Ovarian cancer" (2018)[URL]
  14. Ergina PL, "Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation", Lancet, 374, pp.1097~1104 (2009)
  15. Garas G, "Network analysis of surgical innovation : measuring value and the virality of diffusion in robotic surgery", PLoS One, 12, pp.e0183332~ (2017)
  16. Rutten MJ, "Laparoscopy to predict the result of primary cytoreductive surgery in patients with advanced ovarian cancer : a randomized controlled trial", J Clin Oncol, 35, pp.613~621 (2017)
  17. Böhm S, "Chemotherapy response score : development and validation of a system to quantify histopathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma", J Clin Oncol, 33, pp.2457~2463 (2015)
  18. Nelson G, "Guidelines for pre-and intra-operative care in gynecologic", oncology surgery : Enhanced Recovery After Surgery(ERAS®)Society recommendations--part I, 2016, pp.140, 313~322
  19. Nelson G, "Guidelines for postoperative care in gynecologic", oncology surgery : Enhanced Recovery After Surgery(ERAS®)Society recommendations--part II, 2016, pp.140, 323~332
  20. Aletti GD, "A new frontier for quality of care in gynecologic oncology surgery : multi-institutional assessment of short-term outcomes for ovarian cancer using a risk-adjusted model", Gynecol Oncol, 107, pp.99~106 (2007)
  21. Lucidi A, "Role of robotic surgery in ovarian malignancy", Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 45, pp.74~82 (2017)
  22. Magrina JF, "Robotic approach for ovarian cancer : perioperative and survival results and comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy", Gynecol Oncol, 121, pp.100~105 (2011)
  23. Nezhat FR, "Comparison of perioperative outcomes and complication rates between conventional versus robotic-assisted laparoscopy in the evaluation and management of early, advanced, and recurrent stage ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer", Int J Gynecol Cancer, 24, pp.600~607 (2014)
  24. Feuer GA, "Perioperative and clinical outcomes in the management of epithelial ovarian cancer using a robotic or abdominal approach", Gynecol Oncol, 131, pp.520~524 (2013)
  25. Ackroyd SA, "Interval robotic cytoreduction following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer", J Robot Surg, 12, pp.245~250 (2018)
  26. Tozzi R, "Interval laparoscopic en-bloc resection of the pelvis(L-EnBRP)in patients with stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancer : description of the technique and surgical outcomes", Gynecol Oncol, 142, pp.477~483 (2016)
  27. Favero G, "Oncologic concerns regarding laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery in patients with advanced ovarian cancer submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy", Oncology, 89, pp.159~166 (2015)
  28. Corrado G, "Laparoscopic debulking surgery in the management of advanced ovarian cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy", Int J Gynecol Cancer, 25, pp.1253~1257 (2015)
  29. Cardenas-Goicoechea J, "Minimally invasive interval cytoreductive surgery in ovarian cancer : systematic review and meta-analysis", J Robot Surg, 13, pp.23~33 (2019)
  30. Brown J, "When less is more : minimally invasive surgery compared with laparotomy for interval debulking after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with advanced ovarian cancer", J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 26, pp.902~909 (2019)
  31. Fagotti A, "The INTERNATIONAL MISSION study : minimally invasive surgery in ovarian neoplasms after neoadjuvant chemotherapy", Int J Gynecol Cancer, 29, pp.5~9 (2019)

관련 논문AI추천

Robotic assisted cytoreductive surgery, removal of a recurrent disease in the right pericaval lymph node in a patient with ovarian cancer with the robotic Xi platformHadeer Metwally, Joel Cardenas-Goicoechea, Massoud Shoraka, Semiramis Carbajal-Mamani대한산부인과학회 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science2021 · 제64권 제6호Survival outcomes and toxicity of intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer구유진, 김미정, 김태진, 윤지영, 이기헌, 임경택대한산부인과학회 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science2014 · 제57권 제06호Factors associated with surgical morbidity of primary debulking in epithelial ovarian cancerAli Ayhan, Emre Günakan, Hanifi Şahin, Hüseyin Akıllı, Mehmet Tunç, Yusuf Aytaç Tohma대한산부인과학회 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science2020 · 제63권 제1호Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy as consolidation treatment of advanced stage ovarian cancer박현, 고지은, 송승훈, 이준모, 정상근, 최민철, 하형인, Chan Lee, Won Duk Joo대한산부인과학회 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science2021 · 제64권 제5호Robotic surgery in Gynecology: the present and the future김미란, Gen Yuki, Jae-Yen Song, Jisu Mun, JungYoon Park, SeongEun Bak, Su Jeong Lee, Youn-Jee Chung대한산부인과학회 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science2023 · 제66권 제6호Perioperative Complications of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery Using Three Robotic Arms at a Single Institution김상운, 김성훈, 김영태, 남은지, 임가원연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2015 · 제56권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)