본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Effect of bupivacaine versus lidocaine local anesthesia on postoperative pain reduction in single-port access laparoscopic adnexal surgery using propensity score matching

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류산부인과학

초록

ObjectiveThe umbilicus is a single, painful incisional site on the abdomen during trans-umbilical single-port access laparoscopicsurgery. Previously, we found that periumbilical lidocaine could reduce postoperative pain. This study aimed tocompare the efficacy of bupivacaine and lidocaine in reducing pain. MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis in a study group (Bupivacaine group, 100 patients who received periumbilicalinfiltration of bupivacaine before their incisional site repair completion) and control group (Lidocaine group, 100patients who received lidocaine at their incisional site repair completion). We compared postoperative pain based onthe numerical rating scale (NRS) between propensity score-matched Bupivacaine-treated (n=50) and Lidocaine-treated(n=50) patients. ResultsThe postoperative pain scores based on the NRS were not significantly different between the 2 groups until 12 hourspost-operation. However, 24 hours post-operation, the Bupivacaine group showed significantly lower pain than theLidocaine group (24 hours, 1.76±1.07 vs. 2.53±1.11 NRS, P<0.001; 48 hours, 0.84±0.85 vs. 2.16±0.85 NRS, P<0.001). ConclusionPeriumbilical infiltration of bupivacaine has a longer acting efficacy on reducing postoperative surgical pain than thatof lidocaine.

Abstract

ObjectiveThe umbilicus is a single, painful incisional site on the abdomen during trans-umbilical single-port access laparoscopicsurgery. Previously, we found that periumbilical lidocaine could reduce postoperative pain. This study aimed tocompare the efficacy of bupivacaine and lidocaine in reducing pain. MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis in a study group (Bupivacaine group, 100 patients who received periumbilicalinfiltration of bupivacaine before their incisional site repair completion) and control group (Lidocaine group, 100patients who received lidocaine at their incisional site repair completion). We compared postoperative pain based onthe numerical rating scale (NRS) between propensity score-matched Bupivacaine-treated (n=50) and Lidocaine-treated(n=50) patients. ResultsThe postoperative pain scores based on the NRS were not significantly different between the 2 groups until 12 hourspost-operation. However, 24 hours post-operation, the Bupivacaine group showed significantly lower pain than theLidocaine group (24 hours, 1.76±1.07 vs. 2.53±1.11 NRS, P<0.001; 48 hours, 0.84±0.85 vs. 2.16±0.85 NRS, P<0.001). ConclusionPeriumbilical infiltration of bupivacaine has a longer acting efficacy on reducing postoperative surgical pain than thatof lidocaine.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. Nieboer TE, "Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, pp.CD003677~ (2009)
  2. Thompson B, "Outpatient sterilization by laparoscopy. A report of 666 patients", Obstet Gynecol, 38, pp.912~915 (1971)
  3. Pelosi MA, "Laparoscopic hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy using a single umbilical puncture", N J Med, 88, pp.721~726 (1991)
  4. Song T, "Laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic gynecologic surgery : a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 209, pp.317.e1~317.e9 (2013)
  5. 이인옥, "A comparison of clinical and surgical outcomes between laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery and traditional multiport laparoscopic surgery for adnexal tumors", Obstetrics & Gynecology Science, 57(05), pp.386~392 (2014), 대한산부인과학회[DOI]
  6. Lo CW, "Comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional multiple-port laparoscopic herniorrhaphy : a systemic review and meta-analysis", Hernia, 20, pp.21~32 (2016)
  7. Kim SK, "Laparoendoscopic single-site myomectomy versus conventional laparoscopic myomectomy : a comparison of surgical outcomes", J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 21, pp.775~781 (2014)
  8. Markar SR, "Single-incision laparoscopic surgery(SILS)vs. conventional multiport cholecystectomy : systematic review and meta-analysis", Surg Endosc, 26, pp.1205~1213 (2012)
  9. Yang L, "Systematic review and meta-analysis of single-port versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy", Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 133, pp.9~16 (2016)
  10. Yim GW, "Is single-port access laparoscopy less painful than conventional laparoscopy for adnexal surgery? A comparison of postoperative pain and surgical outcomes", Surg Innov, 20, pp.46~54 (2013)
  11. Eoh KJ, "Periumbilical infiltration of lidocaine with epinephrine for postoperative pain reduction in single-port laparoscopic adnexal surgery", J Obstet Gynaecol, 38, pp.1135~1139 (2018)
  12. Spivey WH, "A clinical comparison of lidocaine and bupivacaine", Ann Emerg Med, 16, pp.752~757 (1987)
  13. Kim J, "Performance of DRG-based reimbursement policy in national health insurance : eight years’ experiences", Value Health, 18, pp.A546~ (2015)
  14. 박정열, "Laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for ovarian mature cystic teratoma", Obstetrics & Gynecology Science, 58(4), pp.294~301 (2015), 대한산부인과학회[DOI]
  15. Kahokehr A, "Systematic review and meta-analysis of intraperitoneal local anaesthetic for pain reduction after laparoscopic gastric procedures", Br J Surg, 98, pp.29~36 (2011)
  16. Woolf CJ, "Preemptive analgesia--treating postoperative pain by preventing the establishment of central sensitization", Anesth Analg, 77, pp.362~379 (1993)
  17. Alhelail M, "Comparison of bupivacaine and lidocaine with epinephrine for digital nerve blocks", Emerg Med J, 26, pp.347~350 (2009)
  18. Miller RD, "A comparison of lidocaine and bupivacaine digital nerve blocks on noninvasive continuous hemoglobin monitoring in a randomized trial in volunteers", Anesth Analg, 118, pp.766~771 (2014)
  19. Su N, "Efficacy and safety of bupivacaine versus lidocaine in dental treatments : a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials", Int Dent J, 64, pp.34~45 (2014)
  20. Yu X, "Efficacy and safety of bupivacaine versus lidocaine in local anesthesia of the nasopharynx : a meta-analysis", Am J Rhinol Allergy, 30, pp.176~180 (2016)
  21. Fathy W, "Effect of local anesthesia(with lidocaine vs bupivacaine)on cognitive function in patients undergoing elective cataract surgery", Local Reg Anesth, 12, pp.1~6 (2019)
  22. Bernards CM, "Effect of epinephrine on lidocaine clearance in vivo : a microdialysis study in humans", Anesthesiology, 91, pp.962~968 (1999)

관련 논문AI추천

The role of port site local anesthetic injection in laparoendoscopic single site surgery: a prospective randomized study김정철, 서종욱, 이인옥, 정재은대한산부인과학회 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science2020 · 제63권 제3호Port site infiltration of local anesthetic after laparoendoscopic single site surgery for benign adnexal disease강순범, 권한성, 김수녕, 김정은, 손인숙, 심승혁, 이선주, 이지영, 이효진, 황한성, 동메아리대한산부인과학회 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science2017 · 제60권 제5호Combination of a pulmonary recruitment maneuver and intraperitoneal bupivacaine for the reduction of postoperative shoulder pain in gynecologic laparoscopy: a randomized, controlled trial김병기, 김철중, 김태중, 배덕수, 이유영, 이정원, 조민애, 최철훈, 함태수대한산부인과학회 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science2020 · 제63권 제2호Comparison of the efficacy of erector spinae plane block according to the difference in bupivacaine concentrations for analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective study박유정, 주진덕, Eunju Yu, Sujung Chu영남대학교 의과대학 · Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science2023 · 제40권 제2호The Effect of Ultrasound-guided TAPB on Pain Management after Total Abdominal HysterectomyFariba Almasi, Farnad Imani, Helen Gharaei, Massoud Solimani대한통증학회 · The Korean Journal of Pain2013 · 제26권 제4호Remifentanil을 이용한 전신마취하에 시행된 복강경 담낭절제술에서 0.25% Levobupivacaine의 트로카 부위침윤과 복강 내 점적주입이 수술 후 진통에 미치는 효과이철, 송윤강대한통증학회 · The Korean Journal of Pain2008 · 제21권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)