본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Cervical polyp: evaluating the need of routine surgical intervention and its correlation with cervical smear cytology and endometrial pathology: a retrospective study

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류산부인과학

초록

ObjectiveTo determine the frequency of premalignant and malignant lesions in cervical polyps in order to examine whethercervical polyps need to be removed routinely and also to appraise its association with cervical smear cytology andendometrial pathologies. MethodsWe retrospectively re-examined the hospital records of 299 cases over a period of 5 years. All patients weresegregated into perimenopausal and postmenopausal groups according to their menopausal status. The groupswere compared in terms of histological results of cervical polyp biopsy, endometrial pathologies, and cervical smearcytology. Pearson’s χ2 test and Fisher’s exact test were used for statistical analysis, and a P-value of <0.05 was acceptedas statistically significant. ResultsIn the histopathological reports of cervical polyps, premalignant lesions were found in 2% of cases, and only 0.3%of malignant lesion was observed in menopausal women. Subsequently, no malignancy was noted in cervical smearcytology for both groups. Premalignant and malignant lesions in endometrial histopathology findings were 1.33%and 0.66%, respectively. There was a statistically significant association between the menopausal status of the patientand cervical smear cytology and endometrial pathology, but the histological findings were not statistically significantin relation to the symptomatic status of the patients. ConclusionAs per the results, we strongly suggest the removal of all cervical polyps with subsequent histological review. Theevaluation of cervical smear cytology prior to polypectomy can provide information about its malignancy potential. We believe that along with cervical polypectomy,endometrial sampling should be recommended,especially for postmenopausal women.

Abstract

ObjectiveTo determine the frequency of premalignant and malignant lesions in cervical polyps in order to examine whethercervical polyps need to be removed routinely and also to appraise its association with cervical smear cytology andendometrial pathologies. MethodsWe retrospectively re-examined the hospital records of 299 cases over a period of 5 years. All patients weresegregated into perimenopausal and postmenopausal groups according to their menopausal status. The groupswere compared in terms of histological results of cervical polyp biopsy, endometrial pathologies, and cervical smearcytology. Pearson’s χ2 test and Fisher’s exact test were used for statistical analysis, and a P-value of <0.05 was acceptedas statistically significant. ResultsIn the histopathological reports of cervical polyps, premalignant lesions were found in 2% of cases, and only 0.3%of malignant lesion was observed in menopausal women. Subsequently, no malignancy was noted in cervical smearcytology for both groups. Premalignant and malignant lesions in endometrial histopathology findings were 1.33%and 0.66%, respectively. There was a statistically significant association between the menopausal status of the patientand cervical smear cytology and endometrial pathology, but the histological findings were not statistically significantin relation to the symptomatic status of the patients. ConclusionAs per the results, we strongly suggest the removal of all cervical polyps with subsequent histological review. Theevaluation of cervical smear cytology prior to polypectomy can provide information about its malignancy potential. We believe that along with cervical polypectomy,endometrial sampling should be recommended,especially for postmenopausal women.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. Farrar HK Jr, "Benign tumors of the uterine cervix", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 81, pp.124~137 (1961)
  2. Khachikyan I, "Current diagnosis & treatment:obstetrics & gynecology", pp.657~659 (2014), Lange (McGraw-Hill)
  3. Cortan RS, "Robbins pathologic basis of disease", pp.1042~1048 (1992), Elsevier
  4. Schnatz PF, "Cervical polyps in postmenopausal women : is there a difference in risk?", Menopause, 16, pp.524~528 (2009)
  5. Berzolla CE, "Dysplasia and malignancy in endocervical polyps", J Womens Health(Larchmt), 16, pp.1317~1321 (2007)
  6. Stenchever MA, "Comprehensive gynecology" (2001), Mosby
  7. Tweeddale DN, "Cervical vs. endometrial carcinoma; the relative incidence of cervical carcinoma and endometrial carcinoma", Obstet Gynecol, 2, pp.623~628 (1953)
  8. Mezer J, "Metaplasia and carcinoma in cervical polyps", Surg Gynecol Obstet, 75, pp.239~244 (1942)
  9. Long ME, "Comparison of dysplastic and benign endocervical polyps", J Low Genit Tract Dis, 17, pp.142~146 (2013)
  10. Stamatellos I, "The role of hysteroscopy in the current management of the cervical polyps", Arch Gynecol Obstet, 276, pp.299~303 (2007)
  11. Buyukbayrak EE, "Cervical polyps : evaluation of routine removal and need for accompanying D&C", Arch Gynecol Obstet, 283, pp.581~584 (2011)
  12. Mackenzie IK, "Why remove all cervical polyps and examine them histologically?", BJOG, 116, pp.1127~1129 (2009)
  13. Younis MT, "Women with asymptomatic cervical polyps may not need to see a gynaecologist or have them removed : an observational retrospective study of 1126 cases", Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 150, pp.190~194 (2010)
  14. Israel SL, "A study of cervical polyps", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 39, pp.45~50 (1940)
  15. Tirlapur SA, "Clinico-pathological study of cervical polyps", Arch Gynecol Obstet, 282, pp.535~538 (2010)
  16. Senturk MB, "Clinicopathological evaluations of cervical polyps", Zeynep Kamil Tip Bulteni, 46, pp.98~101 (2015)
  17. Golan A, "Cervical polyp : evaluation of current treatment", Gynecol Obstet Invest, 37, pp.56~58 (1994)
  18. Levy RA, "Cervical polyps : Is histologic evaluation necessary?", Pathol Res Pract, 212, pp.800~803 (2016)
  19. Goldshmid O, "Is removal of asymptomatic cervical polyps necessary? : histologic findings in asymptomatic Israeli Jewish women", J Low Genit Tract Dis, 15, pp.259~262 (2011)
  20. Nelson AL, "Asymptomatic cervical polyps: can we just let them be?", Womens Health (Lond), 11, pp.121~126 (2015)
  21. Budak A, "Role of endometrial sampling in cases with asymptomatic cervical polyps", J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod, 48, pp.207~211 (2019)
  22. Kaur J, "Cervical cytology in patients with postmenopausal bleeding", Diagn Cytopathol, 38, pp.496~498 (2010)
  23. Cheng RF, "Clinical significance of a cytologic diagnosis of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance", J Reprod Med, 44, pp.922~928 (1999)
  24. Neri A, "Cervical polyp in the menopause and the need for fractional dilatation and curettage", Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 62, pp.53~ (1995)
  25. Hendricks CH, "Polyps : symptoms of cancer?", Obstet Gynecol, 5, pp.726~727 (1955)
  26. Fauth C, "Clinicopathological determinants of vaginal and premalignant-malignant cervico-vaginal polyps of the lower female genital tract", J Low Genit Tract Dis, 15, pp.210~218 (2011)
  27. Coeman D, "Hysteroscopic findings in patients with a cervical polyp", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 169, pp.1563~1565 (1993)
  28. Arslan E, "Abnormal Pap smear frequency and comparison of repeat cytological follow-up with colposcopy during patient management : the importance of pathologist’s guidance in the management", North Clin Istanb, 6, pp.69~74 (2019)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)