본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Use of Gabexate Mesylate and Ulinastatin for the Prevention of Post- Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Background/Aims: Acute pancreatitis is a common complication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Only a few pharmacologic agents have been shown to have potential efficacy for the prophylactic treatment of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). The aim of this study was to determine whether prophylactic gabexate and ulinastatin can decrease the incidence of PEP. Methods: From January 2005 to April 2010, 1,679 patients undergoing ERCP treatment were consecutively enrolled in the study. After selective exclusion, a total of 1,480 patients were included in the analysis. The patients were separated into 3 groups according to the prophylactic administration of gabexate (593 patients), ulinastatin (229 patients), or saline solution (658 patients) and analyzed retrospectively. The primary outcome measurements were the incidence of pancreatitis and hyperamylasemia. Results: PEP occurred in 21 of the 593 (3.5%) patients who received gabexate, 16 of the 229(7.0%) patients who received ulinastatin, and 48 of the 658(7.3%) patients who received a saline solution. The incidence of PEP was signifi cantly different between the gabexate and ulinastatin or saline solution groups (p<0.05). Conclusions:Gabexate prophylaxis is effective in preventing PEP. However,there is no difference in the benefi cial effects of the prophylactic administration of ulinastatin and a saline solution.

Abstract

Background/Aims: Acute pancreatitis is a common complication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Only a few pharmacologic agents have been shown to have potential efficacy for the prophylactic treatment of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). The aim of this study was to determine whether prophylactic gabexate and ulinastatin can decrease the incidence of PEP. Methods: From January 2005 to April 2010, 1,679 patients undergoing ERCP treatment were consecutively enrolled in the study. After selective exclusion, a total of 1,480 patients were included in the analysis. The patients were separated into 3 groups according to the prophylactic administration of gabexate (593 patients), ulinastatin (229 patients), or saline solution (658 patients) and analyzed retrospectively. The primary outcome measurements were the incidence of pancreatitis and hyperamylasemia. Results: PEP occurred in 21 of the 593 (3.5%) patients who received gabexate, 16 of the 229(7.0%) patients who received ulinastatin, and 48 of the 658(7.3%) patients who received a saline solution. The incidence of PEP was signifi cantly different between the gabexate and ulinastatin or saline solution groups (p<0.05). Conclusions:Gabexate prophylaxis is effective in preventing PEP. However,there is no difference in the benefi cial effects of the prophylactic administration of ulinastatin and a saline solution.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. Dumonceau JM, "European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline: prophylaxis of post-ERCP pancreatitis", Endoscopy, 42, pp.503~515 (2010)
  2. Cavallini G, "Gabexate for the prevention of pancreatic damage related to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gabexate in digestive endoscopy: Italian Group", N Engl J Med, 335, pp.919~923 (1996)
  3. Andriulli A, "Prophylaxis of ERCPrelated pancreatitis: a randomized, controlled trial of somatostatin and gabexate mesylate", Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2, pp.713~718 (2004)
  4. Tsujino T, "Ulinastatin for pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a randomized, controlled trial", Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 3, pp.376~383 (2005)
  5. Yoo JW, "Preventive effects of ulinastatin on post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis in high-risk patients: a prospective, randomized, placebocontrolled trial", Pancreas, 37, pp.366~370 (2008)
  6. Choi CW, "Nafamostat mesylate in the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis and risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis", Gastrointest Endosc, 69, pp.e11~e18 (2009)
  7. Cotton PB, "Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus", Gastrointest Endosc, 37, pp.383~393 (1991)
  8. Manes G, "Efficacy of postprocedure administration of gabexate mesylate in the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a randomized, controlled, multicenter study", Gastrointest Endosc, 65, pp.982~987 (2007)
  9. Freeman ML, "Prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a comprehensive review", Gastrointest Endosc, 59, pp.845~864 (2004)
  10. Testoni PA, "Preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis: where are we?", JOP, 4, pp.22~32 (2003)
  11. Tsujino T, "Antiproteases in preventing post-ERCP acute pancreatitis", JOP, 8(4 Suppl), pp.509~517 (2007)
  12. Andriulli A, "Gabexate or somatostatin administration before ERCP in patients at high risk for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a multicenter, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial", Gastrointest Endosc, 56, pp.488~495 (2002)
  13. Ueki T, "Comparison between ulinastatin and gabexate mesylate for the prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: a prospective, randomized trial", J Gastroenterol, 42, pp.161~167 (2007)
  14. Ohnishi H, "Therapeutic effects of human urinary trypsin inhibitor on acute experimental pancreatitis", Nihon Yakurigaku Zasshi, 81, pp.235~244 (1983)
  15. Fujishiro H, "Ulinastatin shows preventive effect on post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis in a multicenter prospective randomized study", J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 21, pp.1065~1069 (2006)
  16. Chen S, "Role of ulinastatin in preventing post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: the Emperor’s New Clothes or Aladdin’s Magic Lamp?", Pancreas, 39, pp.1231~1237 (2010)
  17. Masci E, "Comparison of two dosing regimens of gabexate in the prophylaxis of post-ERCP pancreatitis", Am J Gastroenterol, 98, pp.2182~2186 (2003)
  18. Disario JA, "Endoscopic balloon dilation compared with sphincterotomy for extraction of bile duct stones", Gastroenterology, 127, pp.1291~1299 (2004)
  19. Ueno N, "Pancreatitis induced by endoscopic balloon sphincter dilation and changes in serum amylase levels after the procedure", Gastrointest Endosc, 49(4 Pt 1), pp.472~476 (1999)
  20. Sugiyama M, "Predictive factors for acute pancreatitis and hyperamylasemia after endoscopic papillary balloon dilation", Gastrointest Endosc, 57, pp.531~535 (2003)

관련 논문AI추천

Nafamostat for Prophylaxis against Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis Compared with Gabexate김상우, 김형근, 박재명, 이인석, 정인식, 조유경, 최명규, Jae Hyuck Chang거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2009 · 제3권 제3호Prevention of Postendoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis: The Endoscopic Technique강대환, Byeong Jun Song대한소화기내시경학회 · Clinical Endoscopy2014 · 제47권 제3호Prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis with rectal non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugsEvan L. Fogel, Glen A. Lehman, Hyoung-Chul Oh, Tae Young Park대한내과학회 · The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine2020 · 제35권 제3호Can postendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis be prevented by a pharmacological approach?천영국대한내과학회 · The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine2013 · 제28권 제2호Role of vitamin C and rectal indomethacin in preventing and alleviating post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: a clinical studyAmir Sadeghi, Mahboobe Asadiafrooz, Mohammad Abbasinazari, Rana Jafari-Moghaddam, Sara Ataei대한소화기내시경학회 · Clinical Endoscopy2023 · 제56권 제2호Preventive effect of tacrolimus on patients with post- endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitisAnoop K. Koshy, Harshavardhan B. Rao, Paul K. Vincent, Priya Nair, Rama P. Venu대한소화기내시경학회 · Clinical Endoscopy2022 · 제55권 제5호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (18건)