Delayed Flumazenil Injection after Endoscopic Sedation Increases Patient Satisfaction Compared with Immediate Flumazenil Injection
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background/Aims: Flumazenil was administered after the completion of endoscopy under sedation to reduce recovery time and increase patient safety. We evaluated patient satisfaction after endoscopy under sedation according to the timing of a postprocedural flumazenil injection. Methods: In total, 200 subjects undergoing concurrent colonoscopy and upper endoscopy while sedated with midazolam and meperidine were enrolled in our investigation. We randomly administered 0.3 mg of flumazenil either immediately or 15 minutes after the endoscopic procedure. A postprocedural questionnaire and next day telephone interview were conducted to assess patient satisfaction. Results: Flumazenil injection timing did not affect the time spent in the recovery room when comparing the two groups of patients. However, the subjects in the 15 minutes injection group were more satisfied with undergoing endoscopy under sedation than the patients in the immediate injection group according to the postprocedural survey (p=0.019). However, no difference in overall satisfaction, memory, or willingness to undergo a future endoscopy was observed between the two groups when the telephone survey was conducted on the following day. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that a delayed flumazenil injection after endoscopic sedation increased patient satisfaction without prolonging recovery time, even though the benefit of the delayed flumazenil injection did not persist into the following day.
Abstract
Background/Aims: Flumazenil was administered after the completion of endoscopy under sedation to reduce recovery time and increase patient safety. We evaluated patient satisfaction after endoscopy under sedation according to the timing of a postprocedural flumazenil injection. Methods: In total, 200 subjects undergoing concurrent colonoscopy and upper endoscopy while sedated with midazolam and meperidine were enrolled in our investigation. We randomly administered 0.3 mg of flumazenil either immediately or 15 minutes after the endoscopic procedure. A postprocedural questionnaire and next day telephone interview were conducted to assess patient satisfaction. Results: Flumazenil injection timing did not affect the time spent in the recovery room when comparing the two groups of patients. However, the subjects in the 15 minutes injection group were more satisfied with undergoing endoscopy under sedation than the patients in the immediate injection group according to the postprocedural survey (p=0.019). However, no difference in overall satisfaction, memory, or willingness to undergo a future endoscopy was observed between the two groups when the telephone survey was conducted on the following day. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that a delayed flumazenil injection after endoscopic sedation increased patient satisfaction without prolonging recovery time, even though the benefit of the delayed flumazenil injection did not persist into the following day.
참고문헌 (18)
- Lee J, "Cancer incidence among Korean-American immigrants in the United States and native Koreans in South Korea", Cancer Control, 14, pp.78~85 (2007)
- Chokhavatia S, "Sedation and analgesia for gastrointestinal endoscopy", Am J Gastroenterol, 88, pp.393~396 (1993)
- Cohen LB, "AGA Institute review of endoscopic sedation", Gastroenterology, 133, pp.675~701 (2007)
- Owens WD, "ASA physical status classifications: a study of consistency of ratings", Anesthesiology, 49, pp.239~243 (1978)
- Chernik DA, "Validity and reliability of the Observer’s Assessment of Alertness", Sedation Scale: study with intravenous midazolam, 1990, pp.10, 244~251
- Chung F, "A post-anesthetic discharge scoring system for home readiness after ambulatory surgery", J Clin Anesth, 7, pp.500~506 (1995)
- Trummel JM, "Comparison of differing sedation practice for upper endoscopic ultrasound using expert observational analysis of the procedural sedation", J Patient Saf, 5, pp.153~159 (2009)
- Lee Sun Young, "Identification of Factors that Influence Conscious Sedation in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy", Journal of Korean Medical Science, 19(4), pp.536~540 (2004), 대한의학회
- Cohen LB, "Moderate level sedation during endoscopy: a prospective study using low-dose propofol, meperidine", fentanyl, and midazolam, 2004, pp.59, 795~803
- Cohen LB, "Endoscopic sedation in the United States: results from a nationwide survey", Am J Gastroenterol, 101, pp.967~974 (2006)
- Waring JP, "Guidelines for conscious sedation and monitoring during gastrointestinal endoscopy", Gastrointest Endosc, 58, pp.317~322 (2003)
- Wille RT, "Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of flumazenil for routine outpatient EGD", Gastrointest Endosc, 51, pp.282~287 (2000)
- Lazzaroni M, "Bianchi Porro G. Preparation, premedication and surveillance", Endoscopy, 35, pp.103~111 (2003)
- Chang AC, "Impact of flumazenil on recovery after outpatient endoscopy: a placebo-controlled trial", Gastrointest Endosc, 49, pp.573~579 (1999)
- Amrein R, "Pharmacology of dormicum (midazolam) and anexate (flumazenil)", Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl, 92, pp.6~15 (1990)
- Walker JA, "Nurse-administered propofol sedation without anesthesia specialists in 9152 endoscopic cases in an ambulatory surgery center", Am J Gastroenterol, 98, pp.1744~1750 (2003)
- Brogden RN, "Flumazenil. A reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy as a benzodiazepine antagonist", Drugs, 42, pp.1061~1089 (1991)
- Azmi N, "Evaluation of patient satisfaction of an outpatient gastroscopy service in an Asian tertiary care hospital", BMC Gastroenterol, 12, pp.96~ (2012)