Difficult Biliary Cannulation from the Perspective of Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis: Identifying the Optimal Timing for the Rescue Cannulation Technique
2
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background/Aims: Recently, the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) proposed criteria for “difficult biliary cannulation” during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). This study aimed to investigate the clinical relevance of the ESGE criteria from the perspective of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). Methods: An ERCP database was prospectively maintained between November 2014 and December 2015 across six teaching hospitals in South Korea. The ESGE criteria (biliary cannulation time, the number of cannulation attempts, and inadvertent pancreatic duct [PD] manipulation) were recorded in this database as well as other technical factors. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for PEP. Then, the PEP prediction model was investigated using decision tree analysis. Results: We analyzed 1,067 consecutive patients with naïve papilla. The overall rate of PEP was 6.6%. Multivariate analysis revealed that female sex (odds ratio [OR], 1.860; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.124 to 3.078), a selective biliary cannulation duration >5 minutes (OR, 3.282; 95% CI, 1.641 to 6.566), and inadvertent PD manipulation (OR, 2.614; 95% CI, 1.480 to 4.617) were significant factors affecting PEP. Decision tree analysis revealed that biliary cannulation time (χ2=49.857, p<0.001) and inadvertent PD manipulation (χ2=8.556, p=0.010) were decisive factors. PEP occurred in 3.9%, 11.8%, and 16.2% of patients with biliary cannulation duration lasting 3 to 5 minutes, >5 minutes, and >5 minutes with inadvertent PD manipulation, respectively. Conclusions: Biliary cannulation time and inadvertent PD manipulation could be relevant indicators of PEP, and 5 minutes might be used as a cutoff value for the implementation of the rescue cannulation technique.
Abstract
Background/Aims: Recently, the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) proposed criteria for “difficult biliary cannulation” during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). This study aimed to investigate the clinical relevance of the ESGE criteria from the perspective of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). Methods: An ERCP database was prospectively maintained between November 2014 and December 2015 across six teaching hospitals in South Korea. The ESGE criteria (biliary cannulation time, the number of cannulation attempts, and inadvertent pancreatic duct [PD] manipulation) were recorded in this database as well as other technical factors. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for PEP. Then, the PEP prediction model was investigated using decision tree analysis. Results: We analyzed 1,067 consecutive patients with naïve papilla. The overall rate of PEP was 6.6%. Multivariate analysis revealed that female sex (odds ratio [OR], 1.860; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.124 to 3.078), a selective biliary cannulation duration >5 minutes (OR, 3.282; 95% CI, 1.641 to 6.566), and inadvertent PD manipulation (OR, 2.614; 95% CI, 1.480 to 4.617) were significant factors affecting PEP. Decision tree analysis revealed that biliary cannulation time (χ2=49.857, p<0.001) and inadvertent PD manipulation (χ2=8.556, p=0.010) were decisive factors. PEP occurred in 3.9%, 11.8%, and 16.2% of patients with biliary cannulation duration lasting 3 to 5 minutes, >5 minutes, and >5 minutes with inadvertent PD manipulation, respectively. Conclusions: Biliary cannulation time and inadvertent PD manipulation could be relevant indicators of PEP, and 5 minutes might be used as a cutoff value for the implementation of the rescue cannulation technique.
참고문헌 (16)
- Williams EJ, "Are we meeting the standards set for endoscopy? Results of a large-scale prospective survey of endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatograph practice", Gut, 56, pp.821~829 (2007)
- Halttunen J, "Difficult cannulation as defined by a prospective study of the Scandinavian Association for Digestive Endoscopy(SADE)in 907 ERCPs", Scand J Gastroenterol, 49, pp.752~758 (2014)
- Freeman ML, "Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis : a prospective, multicenter study", Gastrointest Endosc, 54, pp.425~434 (2001)
- Dumonceau JM, "Prophylaxis of post-ERCP pancreatitis : European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy(ESGE)guideline : updated June 2014", Endoscopy, 46, pp.799~815 (2014)
- Testoni PA, "Papillary cannulation and sphincterotomy techniques at ERCP : European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy(ESGE)clinical guideline", Endoscopy, 48, pp.657~683 (2016)
- Cotton PB, "Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management : an attempt at consensus", Gastrointest Endosc, 37, pp.383~393 (1991)
- Cotton PB, "Risk factors for complications after ERCP : a multivariate analysis of 11, 497 procedures over 12 years", Gastrointest Endosc, 70, pp.80~88 (2009)
- Tian C, "Cannulation time is a more accurate measure of cannulation difficulty in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography than the number of attempts", Gastroenterol Rep(Oxf), 1, pp.193~197 (2013)
- Mariani A, "Early precut sphincterotomy for difficult biliary access to reduce post-ERCP pancreatitis : a randomized trial", Endoscopy, 48, pp.530~535 (2016)
- Sundaralingam P, "Early precut sphincterotomy does not increase risk during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with difficult biliary access : a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials", Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 13, pp.1722~1729 (2015)
- Tang Z, "Early precut sphincterotomy does not increase the risk of adverse events for patients with difficult biliary access: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis", Medicine(Baltimore), 97, pp.e12213~ (2018)
- Hess KR, "Classification and regression tree analysis of 1000 consecutive patients with unknown primary carcinoma", Clin Cancer Res, 5, pp.3403~3410 (1999)
- Garzotto M, "Improved detection of prostate cancer using classification and regression tree analysis", J Clin Oncol, 23, pp.4322~4329 (2005)
- Austin PC, "A comparison of regression trees, logistic regression, generalized additive models, and multivariate adaptive regression splines for predicting AMI mortality", Stat Med, 26, pp.2937~2957 (2007)
- Rokach L, "Data mining with decision trees : theory and applications" (2014), World Scientific Publishing
- De Melo NB, "Head and neck cancer, quality of life, and determinant factors : a novel approach using decision tree analysis", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol, 126, pp.486~493 (2018)