The Comparison of Endoscopic Biliary Drainage in Malignant Hilar Obstruction by Cholangiocarcinoma: Bilateral Metal Stents versus Multiple Plastic Stents
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background/Aims: For the management of hilar malignant biliary obstruction (HMBO), endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD) is preferred over percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) because of its convenience. However, there is no established guideline for malignant hilar obstruction that requires multiple stenting. In this study, we compared the efficacy of bilateral metal stents (BMS) versus multiple plastic stents (MPS). Methods: In this retrospective study, we analyzed 102 patients who underwent EBD with either BMS or MPS due to HMBO caused by hilar cholangiocarcinoma between 1996 and 2018 at Samsung Medical Center. We compared the successful drainage rates, cholangitis events, overall complications, mortality, and conversion rates to PTBD between the two groups. Results: The successful drainage rates in the BMS group and the MPS group were 71.4% (25/35) and 65.6% (44/67), respectively, with no significant difference. The MPS group had a higher cholangitis risk (hazard ratio [HR], 2.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21 to 3.58) and higher 6-month mortality (HR, 2.91; 95% CI, 1.26 to 6.71) than the BMS group. There were no significant differences in overall complications or the conversion rate to PTBD between the groups. Conclusions: In patients with malignant HMBO, the BMS group showed better outcomes in terms of the cholangitis rate and 6-month mortality than the MPS group. Therefore, if possible, bilateral metal stenting is recommended for HMBO caused by hilar cholangiocarcinoma.
Abstract
Background/Aims: For the management of hilar malignant biliary obstruction (HMBO), endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD) is preferred over percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) because of its convenience. However, there is no established guideline for malignant hilar obstruction that requires multiple stenting. In this study, we compared the efficacy of bilateral metal stents (BMS) versus multiple plastic stents (MPS). Methods: In this retrospective study, we analyzed 102 patients who underwent EBD with either BMS or MPS due to HMBO caused by hilar cholangiocarcinoma between 1996 and 2018 at Samsung Medical Center. We compared the successful drainage rates, cholangitis events, overall complications, mortality, and conversion rates to PTBD between the two groups. Results: The successful drainage rates in the BMS group and the MPS group were 71.4% (25/35) and 65.6% (44/67), respectively, with no significant difference. The MPS group had a higher cholangitis risk (hazard ratio [HR], 2.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21 to 3.58) and higher 6-month mortality (HR, 2.91; 95% CI, 1.26 to 6.71) than the BMS group. There were no significant differences in overall complications or the conversion rate to PTBD between the groups. Conclusions: In patients with malignant HMBO, the BMS group showed better outcomes in terms of the cholangitis rate and 6-month mortality than the MPS group. Therefore, if possible, bilateral metal stenting is recommended for HMBO caused by hilar cholangiocarcinoma.
참고문헌 (26)
- Ballinger AB, "Symptom relief and quality of life after stenting for malignant bile duct obstruction", Gut, 35, pp.467~470 (1994)
- Fukasawa M, "Endoscopic biliary stenting for unresectable malignant hilar obstruction", Clin J Gastroenterol, 10, pp.485~490 (2017)
- Davids PH, "Randomised trial of self-expanding metal stents versus polyethylene stents for distal malignant biliary obstruction", Lancet, 340, pp.1488~1492 (1992)
- Moss AC, "Do the benefits of metal stents justify the costs? A systematic review and meta-analysis of trials comparing endoscopic stents for malignant biliary obstruction", Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 19, pp.1119~1124 (2007)
- Soderlund C, "Covered metal versus plastic stents for malignant common bile duct stenosis : a prospective, randomized, controlled trial", Gastrointest Endosc, 63, pp.986~995 (2006)
- Mukai T, "Metallic stents are more efficacious than plastic stents in unresectable malig-nant hilar biliary strictures : a randomized controlled trial", J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 20, pp.214~222 (2013)
- Sangchan A, "Efficacy of metal and plastic stents in unresectable complex hilar cholangiocarcinoma : a randomized controlled trial", Gastrointest Endosc, 76, pp.93~99 (2012)
- Kaassis M, "Plastic or metal stents for malignant stricture of the common bile duct? Results of a randomized prospective study", Gastrointest Endosc, 57, pp.178~182 (2003)
- Levy MJ, "Palliation of malignant extrahepatic biliary obstruction with plastic versus expandable metal stents : an evidence-based approach", Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2, pp.273~285 (2004)
- Rerknimitr R, "Asia-Pacific consensus recommendations for endoscopic and interventional management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma", J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 28, pp.593~607 (2013)
- Sangchan A, "Cost utility analysis of endoscopic biliary stent in unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma : decision analytic modeling approach", Hepatogastroenterology, 61, pp.1175~1181 (2014)
- Cheng JL, "Endoscopic palliation of patients with biliary obstruction caused by nonresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma : efficacy of self-expandable metallic Wallstents", Gastrointest Endosc, 56, pp.33~39 (2002)
- Raju RP, "Optimum palliation of inoperable hilar cholangiocarcinoma : comparative assessment of the efficacy of plastic and self-expanding metal stents", Dig Dis Sci, 56, pp.1557~1564 (2011)
- Lee TH, "Bilateral versus unilateral placement of metal stents for inoperable high-grade malignant hilar biliary strictures : a multicenter, prospective, randomized study(with video)", Gastrointest Endosc, 86, pp.817~827 (2017)
- Liberato MJ, "Endoscopic stenting for hilar cholangiocarcinoma : efficacy of unilateral and bilateral placement of plastic and metal stents in a retrospective review of 480 patients", BMC Gastroenterol, 12, pp.103~ (2012)
- Naitoh I, "Unilateral versus bilateral endoscopic metal stenting for malignant hilar biliary obstruction", J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 24, pp.552~557 (2009)
- Sawas T, "Self-expandable metal stents versus plastic stents for malignant biliary obstruction : a meta-analysis", Gastrointest Endosc, 82, pp.256~267 (2015)
- Cotton PB, "Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management : an attempt at consensus", Gastrointest Endosc, 37, pp.383~393 (1991)
- Freeman ML, "Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy", N Engl J Med, 335, pp.909~918 (1996)
- Guo Z, "Modeling repeated time-toevent health conditions with discontinuous risk intervals : an example of a longitudinal study of functional disability among older persons", Methods Inf Med, 47, pp.107~116 (2008)
- Wagner HJ, "Plastic endoprostheses versus metal stents in the palliative treatment of malignant hilar biliary obstruction : a prospective and randomized trial", Endoscopy, 25, pp.213~218 (1993)
- De Palma GD, "Unilateral versus bilateral endoscopic hepatic duct drainage in patients with malignant hilar biliary obstruction : results of a prospective, randomized, and controlled study", Gastrointest Endosc, 53, pp.547~553 (2001)
- Iwano H, "Unilateral versus bilateral drainage using self-expandable metallic stent for unresectable hilar biliary obstruction", Dig Endosc, 23, pp.43~48 (2011)
- Lee TH, "Biliary stenting for hilar malignant biliary obstruction", Dig Endosc, 32, pp.275~286 (2020)
- Min Jae Yang, "Prospective Multicenter Study of the Challenges Inherent in Using Large Cell-Type Stents for Bilateral Stent-in-Stent Placement in Patients with Inoperable Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction", Gut and Liver, 12(6), pp.722~727 (2018), 거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회
- Xia MX, "Comparison of endoscopic bilateral metal stent drainage with plastic stents in the palliation of unresectable hilar biliary malignant strictures : large multicenter study", Dig Endosc, 33, pp.179~189 (2021)