The Performance of a Modified Glasgow Blatchford Score in Predicting Clinical Interventions in Patients with Acute Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Vietnamese Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study
3
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background/Aims: To compare the performance of a modified Glasgow Blatchford score (mGBS) to the Glasgow Blatchford score (GBS) and the pre-endoscopic Rockall score (RS) in predicting clinical interventions in Vietnamese patients with acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (ANVUGIB). Methods: A prospective multicenter cohort study was conducted in five tertiary hospitals from May 2013 to February 2014. The mGBS, GBS, and pre-endoscopic RS scores were prospectively calculated for all patients. The accuracy of mGBS was compared with that of GBS and preendoscopic RS using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Clinical interventions were defined as blood transfusions, endoscopic or radiological intervention, or surgery. Results: There were 395 patients including 128 (32.4%) needing endoscopic treatment, 117 (29.6%) requiring blood transfusion and two (0.5%) needing surgery. In predicting the need for clinical intervention, the mGBS (AUC, 0.707) performed as well as the GBS (AUC, 0.708; p=0.87) and outperformed the pre-endoscopic RS (AUC, 0.594; p<0.001). However, none of these scores effectively excluded the need for endoscopic intervention at a threshold of 0. Conclusions: mGBS performed as well as GBS and better than pre-endoscopic RS for predicting clinical interventions in Vietnamese patients with ANVUGIB.
Abstract
Background/Aims: To compare the performance of a modified Glasgow Blatchford score (mGBS) to the Glasgow Blatchford score (GBS) and the pre-endoscopic Rockall score (RS) in predicting clinical interventions in Vietnamese patients with acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (ANVUGIB). Methods: A prospective multicenter cohort study was conducted in five tertiary hospitals from May 2013 to February 2014. The mGBS, GBS, and pre-endoscopic RS scores were prospectively calculated for all patients. The accuracy of mGBS was compared with that of GBS and preendoscopic RS using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Clinical interventions were defined as blood transfusions, endoscopic or radiological intervention, or surgery. Results: There were 395 patients including 128 (32.4%) needing endoscopic treatment, 117 (29.6%) requiring blood transfusion and two (0.5%) needing surgery. In predicting the need for clinical intervention, the mGBS (AUC, 0.707) performed as well as the GBS (AUC, 0.708; p=0.87) and outperformed the pre-endoscopic RS (AUC, 0.594; p<0.001). However, none of these scores effectively excluded the need for endoscopic intervention at a threshold of 0. Conclusions: mGBS performed as well as GBS and better than pre-endoscopic RS for predicting clinical interventions in Vietnamese patients with ANVUGIB.
참고문헌 (15)
- Barkun AN, "International consensus recommendations on the management of patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding", Ann Intern Med, 152, pp.101~113 (2010)
- Laine L, "Management of patients with ulcer bleeding", Am J Gastroenterol, 107, pp.345~360 (2012)
- Sung JJ, "Asia-Pacific Working Group consensus on non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding", Gut, 60, pp.1170~1177 (2011)
- Pang SH, "Comparing the Blatchford and pre-endoscopic Rockall score in predicting the need for endoscopic therapy in patients with upper GI hemorrhage", Gastrointest Endosc, 71, pp.1134~1140 (2010)
- Cheng DW, "A modified Glasgow Blatchford Score improves risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleed: a prospective comparison of scoring systems", Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 36, pp.782~789 (2012)
- DeLong ER, "Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach", Biometrics, 44, pp.837~845 (1988)
- Lanas A, "The changing face of hospitalisation due to gastrointestinal bleeding and perforation", Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 33, pp.585~591 (2011)
- Chen IC, "Risk scoring systems to predict need for clinical intervention for patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding", Am J Emerg Med, 25, pp.774~779 (2007)
- Stanley AJ, "Multicentre comparison of the Glasgow Blatchford and Rockall Scores in the prediction of clinical end-points after upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage", Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 34, pp.470~475 (2011)
- Chandra S, "External validation of the Glasgow-Blatchford Bleeding Score and the Rockall Score in the US setting", Am J Emerg Med, 30, pp.673~679 (2012)
- Cooper GS, "The effectiveness of early endoscopy for upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage:a community-based analysis", Med Care, 36, pp.462~474 (1998)
- Cooper GS, "Early endoscopy in upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: associations with recurrent bleeding, surgery, and length of hospital stay", Gastrointest Endosc, 49, pp.145~152 (1999)
- Laine L, "Endoscopic therapy for bleeding ulcers: an evidence-based approach based on meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials", Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 7, pp.33~47 (2009)
- Farooq FT, "Clinical triage decision vs risk scores in predicting the need for endotherapy in upper gastrointestinal bleeding", Am J Emerg Med, 30, pp.129~134 (2012)
- de Groot N, "Prediction scores or gastroenterologists’Gut Feeling for triaging patients that present with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding", United European Gastroenterol J, 2, pp.197~205 (2014)