본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Tumor Marker Kinetics as Prognosticators in Patients with Unresectable Gallbladder Adenocarcinoma Undergoing Palliative Chemotherapy

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Background/Aims: To determine the prognostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 in gallbladder cancer (GBC) during palliative chemotherapy. Methods: One hundred and twenty-three patients with pathologically confirmed unresectable GBC were included. Differences in serum CEA and CA 19-9 levels before and after chemotherapy were measured. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, Kaplan-Meier analyses of CEA, CA 19-9, and combined changes were performed to assess the optimal cutoff values and survival rates. Results: Patients with decreased tumor markers had significantly better progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than patients with increased tumor markers. The pre- and postchemotherapy CA 19-9 ratio had the highest area-under-the-curve values for predicting 3-month PFS and 1-year OS. In the multivariate analysis, increases in serum CA 19-9 during palliative chemotherapy in patients with unresectable GBC was an independent prognosticator of poor PFS and OS, with hazard ratios of 2.20 (p=0.001) and 1.67 (p=0.020), respectively. Patients with increases >10-fold were considered to have progressive disease, whereas individuals with increases >3-fold were likely to benefit from early imaging follow-up. Conclusions: CA 19-9 kinetics was a reliable prognosticator of PFS and OS in patients with unresectable GBC who underwent palliative chemotherapy.

Abstract

Background/Aims: To determine the prognostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 in gallbladder cancer (GBC) during palliative chemotherapy. Methods: One hundred and twenty-three patients with pathologically confirmed unresectable GBC were included. Differences in serum CEA and CA 19-9 levels before and after chemotherapy were measured. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, Kaplan-Meier analyses of CEA, CA 19-9, and combined changes were performed to assess the optimal cutoff values and survival rates. Results: Patients with decreased tumor markers had significantly better progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than patients with increased tumor markers. The pre- and postchemotherapy CA 19-9 ratio had the highest area-under-the-curve values for predicting 3-month PFS and 1-year OS. In the multivariate analysis, increases in serum CA 19-9 during palliative chemotherapy in patients with unresectable GBC was an independent prognosticator of poor PFS and OS, with hazard ratios of 2.20 (p=0.001) and 1.67 (p=0.020), respectively. Patients with increases >10-fold were considered to have progressive disease, whereas individuals with increases >3-fold were likely to benefit from early imaging follow-up. Conclusions: CA 19-9 kinetics was a reliable prognosticator of PFS and OS in patients with unresectable GBC who underwent palliative chemotherapy.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. Howlader N, "SEER cancer statistics review, 1975-2013", National Cancer Institute, ~ (2015)
  2. Sharma A, "Best supportive care compared with chemotherapy for unresectable gall bladder cancer: a randomized controlled study", J Clin Oncol, 28, pp.4581~4586 (2010)[DOI]
  3. 박준오, "Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: A Systematic Review", Cancer Research and Treatment, 47(3), pp.343~361 (2015), 대한암학회[DOI]
  4. Grunnet M, "Serum tumor markers in bile duct cancer: a review", Biomarkers, 19, pp.437~443 (2014)[DOI]
  5. Vainshtein JM, "Prognostic significance of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 in unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer treated with dose-escalated intensity modulated radiation therapy and concurrent full-dose gemcitabine: analysis of a prospective phase 1", 2 dose escalation study, 2013, pp.86, 96~101
  6. Ziske C, "Prognostic value of CA 19-9 levels in patients with inoperable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas treated with gemcitabine", Br J Cancer, 89, pp.1413~1417 (2003)[DOI]
  7. Haas M, "Prognostic value of CA 19-9, CEA, CRP, LDH and bilirubin levels in locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer: results from a multicenter, pooled analysis of patients receiving palliative chemotherapy", J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 139, pp.681~689 (2013)[DOI]
  8. Ko AH, "Serum CA19-9 response as a surrogate for clinical outcome in patients receiving fixed-dose rate gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer", Br J Cancer, 93, pp.195~199 (2005)[DOI]
  9. Lee BS, "Prognostic value of CA 19-9 kinetics during gemcitabine-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma", J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 31, pp.493~500 (2016)[DOI]
  10. Shukla VK, "Diagnostic value of serum CA242, CA 19-9, CA 15-3 and CA 125 in patients with carcinoma of the gallbladder", Trop Gastroenterol, 27, pp.160~165 (2006)
  11. Rana S, "Evaluation of CA 242 as a tumor marker in gallbladder cancer", J Gastrointest Cancer, 43, pp.267~271 (2012)[DOI]
  12. Wang YF, "Combined detection tumor markers for diagnosis and prognosis of gallbladder cancer", World J Gastroenterol, 20, pp.4085~4092 (2014)[DOI]
  13. Huang L, "Serum CYFRA 21-1 in biliary tract cancers: a reliable biomarker for gallbladder carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma", Dig Dis Sci, 60, pp.1273~1283 (2015)[DOI]
  14. Yu T, "Preoperative prediction of survival in resectable gallbladder cancer by a combined utilization of CA 19-9 and carcinoembryonic antigen", Chin Med J (Engl), 127, pp.2299~2303 (2014)
  15. Jeong Y, "Postoperative radiotherapy for gallbladder cancer", Anticancer Res, 34, pp.5621~5629 (2014)
  16. Noshiro H, "Factors affecting surgical outcome for gallbladder carcinoma", Hepatogastroenterology, 50, pp.939~944 (2003)
  17. Shukla PJ, "A new scoring system for gallbladder cancer (aiding treatment algorithm): an analysis of 335 patients", Ann Surg Oncol, 15, pp.3132~3137 (2008)[DOI]
  18. Fernandez-Ruiz M, "Comorbidity negatively influences prognosis in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma", World J Gastroenterol, 15, pp.5279~5286 (2009)[DOI]
  19. Sun XN, "Prognostic impact of vascular endothelial growth factor-A expression in resected gallbladder carcinoma", Tumour Biol, 32, pp.1183~1190 (2011)[DOI]
  20. Kwon YJ, "Is T-stage the only significant factor determining the extent of surgery for gallbladder cancer?", Hepatogastroenterology, 61, pp.304~306 (2014)
  21. Chakravarty KD, "Factors influencing long-term survival in patients with T3 gallbladder adenocarcinoma", Digestion, 79, pp.151~157 (2009)[DOI]
  22. Ong SL, "Elevation of carbohydrate antigen 19.9 in benign hepatobiliary conditions and its correlation with serum bilirubin concentration", Dig Dis Sci, 53, pp.3213~3217 (2008)[DOI]
  23. Kim YC, "Can preoperative CA19-9 and CEA levels predict the resectability of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma?", J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 24, pp.1869~1875 (2009)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

CA19-9 or CEA Decline after the First Cycle of Treatment Predicts Survival in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer Patients Treated with S-1 and Cisplatin Chemotherapy김유정, 김지현, 김태용, 김태유, 나임일, 방영주, 양예원, 오도연, 이경훈, 이대원, 이지영, 임석아, 최인실, 한세원대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2017 · 제49권 제3호Usefulness of Carcinoembryonic Antigen for Monitoring Tumor Progression during Palliative Chemotherapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer김강미, 유춘근, 정은주, 황대용연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2013 · 제54권 제1호Serum CA 19-9 and CEA Levels as a Prognostic Factor in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma박승우, 박정엽, 송시영, 이경주, 이승우, 정문재, 정재복연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2013 · 제54권 제3호Clinical Significance of Discordance between Carcinoembryonic Antigen Levels and RECIST in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer김인호, 김준기, 양지현, 오승택, 이명아, 이지은, 정준원, 최문형, Sangmi Ro대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2018 · 제50권 제1호A Multicenter Phase II Trial of Gemcitabine Plus Oxaliplatin in Unresectable Gallbladder Cancer김용태, 류지곤, 박주경, 서정균, 양기영, 우상명, 유지원, 윤용범, 이상협, 이우진, 황진혁거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2013 · 제7권 제5호Chemotherapy versus Best Supportive Care in Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma: A Multi-institutional Propensity Score Matching Analysis강정훈, 김록범, 김영생, 박인근, 박준오, 송하나, 오성용, 이순일, 장정순, 지준호, 황인규대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2018 · 제50권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)