본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Outcomes of Infected versus Symptomatic Sterile Walled-Off Pancreatic Necrosis Treated with a Minimally Invasive Therapy

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Background/Aims: Acute pancreatitis complicated by walled-off necrosis (WON) is associated with high morbidity and mortality, and if infected, typically necessitates intervention. Clinical outcomes of infected WON have been described as poorer than those of symptomatic sterile WON. With the evolution of minimally invasive therapy, we sought to compare outcomes of infected to symptomatic sterile WON. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study examining patients who were undergoing dual-modality drainage as minimally invasive therapy for WON at a high-volume tertiary pancreatic center. The main outcome measures included mortality with a drain in place, length of hospital stay, admission to intensive care unit, and development of pancreatic fistulae. Results: Of the 211 patients in our analysis, 98 had infected WON. The overall mortality rate was 2.4%. Patients with infected WON trended toward higher mortality although not statistically significant (4.1% vs 0.9%, p=0.19). Patients with infected WON had longer length of hospitalization (29.8 days vs 17.3 days, p<0.01), and developed more spontaneous pancreatic fistulae (23.5% vs 7.8%, p<0.01). Multivariate analysis showed that infected WON was associated with higher odds of spontaneous pancreatic fistula formation (odds ratio, 2.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.20 to 5.85). Conclusions: This study confirms that infected WON has worse outcomes than sterile WON but also demonstrates that WON, once considered a significant cause of death, can be treated with good outcomes using minimally invasive therapy.

Abstract

Background/Aims: Acute pancreatitis complicated by walled-off necrosis (WON) is associated with high morbidity and mortality, and if infected, typically necessitates intervention. Clinical outcomes of infected WON have been described as poorer than those of symptomatic sterile WON. With the evolution of minimally invasive therapy, we sought to compare outcomes of infected to symptomatic sterile WON. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study examining patients who were undergoing dual-modality drainage as minimally invasive therapy for WON at a high-volume tertiary pancreatic center. The main outcome measures included mortality with a drain in place, length of hospital stay, admission to intensive care unit, and development of pancreatic fistulae. Results: Of the 211 patients in our analysis, 98 had infected WON. The overall mortality rate was 2.4%. Patients with infected WON trended toward higher mortality although not statistically significant (4.1% vs 0.9%, p=0.19). Patients with infected WON had longer length of hospitalization (29.8 days vs 17.3 days, p<0.01), and developed more spontaneous pancreatic fistulae (23.5% vs 7.8%, p<0.01). Multivariate analysis showed that infected WON was associated with higher odds of spontaneous pancreatic fistula formation (odds ratio, 2.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.20 to 5.85). Conclusions: This study confirms that infected WON has worse outcomes than sterile WON but also demonstrates that WON, once considered a significant cause of death, can be treated with good outcomes using minimally invasive therapy.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. Banks PA, "practice guidelines in acute pancreatitis", Am J Gastroenterol, 101, pp.2379~2400 (2006)
  2. Banks PA, "Classification of acute pancreatitis-2012 : revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus", Gut, 62, pp.102~111 (2013)
  3. Zhao K, "Acute pancreatitis : revised Atlanta classification and the role of crosssectional imaging", AJR AM J Roentgenol, 205, pp.W32~W41 (2015)
  4. Tenner S, "American College of Gastroenterology guideline:management of acute pancreatitis", Am J Gastroenterol, 108, pp.1400~1415 (2013)
  5. Working Group IAP, "APA Acute Pancreatitis Guidelines", IAP, Pancreatology, pp.2013, 13[DOI]
  6. Perez A, "Is severity of necrotizing pancreatitis increased in extended necrosis and infected necrosis", Pancreas, 25, pp.229~233 (2002)
  7. Rodriguez JR, "Debridement and closed packing for sterile or infected necrotizing pancreatitis : insights into indications and outcomes in 167 patients", Ann Surg, 247, pp.294~299 (2008)
  8. Clancy TE, "Current management of necrotizing pancreatitis", Adv Surg, 36, pp.103~121 (2002)
  9. Besselink MG, "Timing of surgical intervention in necrotizing pancreatitis", Arch Surg, 142, pp.1194~1201 (2007)
  10. "BMC Surg", 2006, 6~
  11. van Santvoort HC, "A conservative and minimally invasive approach to necrotizing pancreatitis improves outcome", Gastroenterology, 141, pp.1254~1263 (2011)
  12. Gardner TB, "A comparison of direct endoscopic necrosectomy with transmural endoscopic drainage for the treatment of walled-off pancreatic necrosis", Gastrointest Endosc, 69, pp.1085~1094 (2009)
  13. Christine Boumitri, "Necrotizing Pancreatitis: Current Management and Therapies", Clinical Endoscopy, 50(4), pp.357~365 (2017), 대한소화기내시경학회
  14. Hiroshi Kawakami, "Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Transluminal Drainage for Peripancreatic Fluid Collections: Where Are We Now?", Gut and Liver, 8(4), pp.341~355 (2014), 거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회
  15. Gluck M, "Endoscopic and percutaneous drainage of symptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis reduces hospital stay and radiographic resources", Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 8, pp.1083~1088 (2010)
  16. Ross A, "Combined endoscopic and percutaneous drainage of organized pancreatic necrosis", Gastrointest Endosc, 71, pp.79~84 (2010)
  17. Gluck M, "Dual modality drainage for symptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis reduces length of hospitalization, radiological procedures, and number of endoscopies compared to standard percutaneous drainage", J Gastrointest Surg, 16, pp.248~256 (2012)
  18. Ross AS, "Dual-modality drainage of infected and symptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis : long-term clinical outcomes", Gastrointest Endosc, 79, pp.929~935 (2014)
  19. Beger HG, "Natural history of necrotizing pancreatitis", Pancreatology, 3, pp.93~101 (2003)
  20. Beger HG, "Bacterial contamination of pancreatic necrosis. A prospective clinical study", Gastroenterology, 91, pp.433~438 (1986)
  21. Petrov MS, "A randomized controlled trial of enteral versus parenteral feeding in patients with predicted severe acute pancreatitis shows a significant reduction in mortality and in infected pancreatic complications with total enteral nutrition", Dig Surg, 23, pp.336~344 (2006)
  22. Bhansali SK, "Infected necrosis complicating acute pancreatitis : experience with 131 cases", Indian J Gastroenterol, 22, pp.7~10 (2003)
  23. Sahar N, "Do lumen-apposing metal stents(LAMS)improve treatment outcomes of walled-off pancreatic necrosis over plastic stents using dual-modality drainage", Endosc Int Open, 5, pp.E1052~E1059 (2017)
  24. Freeny PC, "Percutaneous CT-guided catheter drainage of infected acute necrotizing pancreatitis : techniques and results", AJR Am J Roentgenol, 170, pp.969~975 (1998)
  25. Traverso LW, "Interventional management of peripancreatic fluid collections", Surg Clin North Am, 79, pp.745~757 (1999)
  26. van Brunschot S, "Endoscopic or surgical step-up approach for infected necrotising pancreatitis : a multicenter randomised trial", Lancet, 391, pp.51~58 (2018)
  27. Ho HS, "Gastrointestinal and pancreatic complications associated with severe pancreatitis", Arch Surg, 130, pp.817~822 (1995)
  28. Tsiotos GG, "Incidence and management of pancreatic and enteric fistulas after surgical management of severe necrotizing pancreatitis", Arch Surg, 130, pp.48~52 (1995)
  29. Bassi C, "Pancreatic fistula rate after pancreatic resection : the importance of definitions", Dig Surg, 21, pp.54~59 (2004)
  30. Garg PK, "Primary conservative treatment results in mortality comparable to surgery in patients with infected pancreatic necrosis", Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 8, pp.1089~1094 (2010)
  31. Mouli VP, "Efficacy of conservative treatment, without necrosectomy, for infected pancreatic necrosis : a systematic review and meta-analysis", Gastroenterology, 144, pp.333~340 (2013)
  32. Barnes SL, "The impact of reducing antibiotics on the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms", Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 38, pp.663~669 (2017)
  33. Trikudanathan G, "Impact of Clostridium difficile infection in patients hospitalized with acute pancreatitis : a population based cohort study", Pancreatology, 17, pp.201~202 (2017)
  34. Singla A, "Admission volume determines outcome for patients with acute pancreatitis", Gastroenterology, 137, pp.1995~2001 (2009)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)