Utility of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration in the Diagnosis of Local Recurrence of Pancreaticobiliary Cancer after Surgical Resection
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background/Aims: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA; EUS-FNA) allows for diagnostic tissue specimens from various regions to be analyzed. However, diagnosing recurrent pancreaticobiliary cancer after surgery is sometimes difficult. We evaluated the efficacy of EUS-FNA in the diagnosis of local recurrence of pancreaticobiliary cancer and analyzed the factors associated with falsenegative results. Methods: Fifty-one consecutive patients who underwent EUS-FNA due to suspected recurrence of pancreaticobiliary cancer after surgery in an academic center were retrospectively analyzed. The criteria for EUS-FNA were a resected margin or remnant pancreas mass, round swollen lymph node (≥10 mm in diameter), and soft-tissue enhancement around a major artery. Patients with suspected liver metastasis or malignant ascites were excluded. Results: Thirty-nine of the 51 patients had pancreatic cancer; the remaining 12 had biliary cancer. The target sites for EUS-FNA were the soft tissue around a major artery (n=22, 43%), the resected margin or remnant pancreas (n=12, 24%), and the lymph nodes (n=17, 33%). The median size of the suspected recurrent lesions was 15 mm (range, 8 to 40 mm). The overall sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of EUS-FNA for the diagnosis of recurrence was 84% (32/38), 100% (13/13), and 88% (45/51), respectively. FNA of the soft tissue around major arteries (odds ratio, 8.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.2 to 166.7; p=0.033) was significantly associated with a falsenegative diagnosis in the multivariate analysis. Conclusions: EUS-FNA is useful for diagnosing recurrent cancer, even after pancreaticobiliary surgery. The diagnoses of recurrence at soft-tissue sites should be interpreted with caution.
Abstract
Background/Aims: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA; EUS-FNA) allows for diagnostic tissue specimens from various regions to be analyzed. However, diagnosing recurrent pancreaticobiliary cancer after surgery is sometimes difficult. We evaluated the efficacy of EUS-FNA in the diagnosis of local recurrence of pancreaticobiliary cancer and analyzed the factors associated with falsenegative results. Methods: Fifty-one consecutive patients who underwent EUS-FNA due to suspected recurrence of pancreaticobiliary cancer after surgery in an academic center were retrospectively analyzed. The criteria for EUS-FNA were a resected margin or remnant pancreas mass, round swollen lymph node (≥10 mm in diameter), and soft-tissue enhancement around a major artery. Patients with suspected liver metastasis or malignant ascites were excluded. Results: Thirty-nine of the 51 patients had pancreatic cancer; the remaining 12 had biliary cancer. The target sites for EUS-FNA were the soft tissue around a major artery (n=22, 43%), the resected margin or remnant pancreas (n=12, 24%), and the lymph nodes (n=17, 33%). The median size of the suspected recurrent lesions was 15 mm (range, 8 to 40 mm). The overall sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of EUS-FNA for the diagnosis of recurrence was 84% (32/38), 100% (13/13), and 88% (45/51), respectively. FNA of the soft tissue around major arteries (odds ratio, 8.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.2 to 166.7; p=0.033) was significantly associated with a falsenegative diagnosis in the multivariate analysis. Conclusions: EUS-FNA is useful for diagnosing recurrent cancer, even after pancreaticobiliary surgery. The diagnoses of recurrence at soft-tissue sites should be interpreted with caution.
참고문헌 (15)
- Siegel R, "Cancer statistics, 2012", CA Cancer J Clin, 62, pp.10~29 (2012)
- Miyazaki M, "Repeat pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal cancer recurrence in the remnant pancreas after initial pancreatectomy: is it worthwhile?", Surgery, 155, pp.58~66 (2014)
- Benassai G, "Factors influencing survival after resection for ductal adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas", J Surg Oncol, 73, pp.212~218 (2000)
- Richter A, "Long-term results of partial pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head : 25-year experience", World J Surg, 27, pp.324~329 (2003)
- Jarnagin WR, "Patterns of initial disease recurrence after resection of gallbladder carcinoma and hilar cholangiocarcinoma : implications for adjuvant therapeutic strategies", Cancer, 98, pp.1689~1700 (2003)
- 구태률, "Patterns of failure and prognostic factors in resected extrahepatic bile duct cancer: implication for adjuvant radiotherapy", Radiation oncology journal, 32(2), pp.63~69 (2014), 대한방사선종양학회
- DeWitt J, "EUS-guided FNA of local recurrence of pancreatic cancer after surgical resection", Gastrointest Endosc, 72, pp.1076~1080 (2010)
- Chang KJ, "The clinical utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic carcinoma", Gastrointest Endosc, 45, pp.387~393 (1997)
- Byrne MF, "Yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of bile duct lesions", Endoscopy, 36, pp.715~719 (2004)
- Fritscher-Ravens A, "EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration of suspected hilar cholangiocarcinoma in potentially operable patients with negative brush cytology", Am J Gastroenterol, 99, pp.45~51 (2004)
- Fuccio L, "The role of K-ras gene mutation analysis in EUS-guided FNA cytology specimens for the differential diagnosis of pancreatic solid masses : a meta-analysis of prospective studies", Gastrointest Endosc, 78, pp.596~608 (2013)
- Sho S, "Digital PCR improves mutation analysis in pancreas fine needle aspiration biopsy specimens", PLoS One, 12, pp.e0170897~ (2017)
- Kitajima K, "Performance of integrated FDG-PET", contrast-enhanced CT in the diagnosis of recurrent pancreatic cancer : comparison with integrated FDG-PET, Mol Imaging Biol, pp.2010, 12[DOI]
- Burkhart RA, "Incidence and severity of pancreatogenic diabetes after pancreatic resection", J Gastrointest Surg, 19, pp.217~225 (2015)
- Javadi S, "Imaging findings of recurrent pancreatic cancer following resection", Abdom Radiol(NY), 43, pp.489~496 (2018)