Four-Step Classification of Endoscopic Transpapillary Gallbladder Drainage and the Practical Efficacy of Cholangioscopic Assistance
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background/Aims: Although endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage (ETGBD) has been reported as an alternative procedure for acute cholecystitis, it requires advanced endoscopic techniques. In terms of the certainty of achieving drainage, it remains a challenging procedure. The aim of the current study was to elucidate the practical efficacy of cholangioscopic assistance and to develop a new classification that could be used to evaluate the technical difficulty of ETGBD and provide a theoretical strategy to apply cholangioscopy appropriately for difficult ETGBD. Methods: A total of 101 patients undergoing ETGBD were retrospectively studied. The characteristics and technical outcomes of ETGBD with conventional ETGBD (C-ETGBD) and Spy- Glass DS-assisted ETGBD (SG-ETGBD) were evaluated. The characteristics and technique-dependent factors of unsuccessful C-ETGBD/SG-ETGBD were evaluated using the classification based on the steps of the procedure. The predictive factors of successful C-ETGBD/SG-ETGBD were examined. Results: C-ETGBD was successful in 73 patients (72.3%). SG-ETGBD was successful in 11 of 13 patients (84.6%) who had C-ETGBD failure. Optional SG-ETGBD significantly increased the final success rate (94.1%) compared to C-ETGBD alone (p=0.003). ETGBD procedures could be classified into four steps. SG-assistance worked as an excellent troubleshooter in step 1 (failure to identify the cystic duct orifice) and step 2 (failure of guidewire advancement across the downturned angle of cystic duct takeoff). Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography could provide predictive information based on the classification. Conclusions: Optional SG-ETGBD achieved a significantly higher success rate than C-ETGBD alone. Step classification is helpful for determining the technical difficulty of ETGBD and developing a theoretical strategy to apply cholangioscopy in a coordinated manner.
Abstract
Background/Aims: Although endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage (ETGBD) has been reported as an alternative procedure for acute cholecystitis, it requires advanced endoscopic techniques. In terms of the certainty of achieving drainage, it remains a challenging procedure. The aim of the current study was to elucidate the practical efficacy of cholangioscopic assistance and to develop a new classification that could be used to evaluate the technical difficulty of ETGBD and provide a theoretical strategy to apply cholangioscopy appropriately for difficult ETGBD. Methods: A total of 101 patients undergoing ETGBD were retrospectively studied. The characteristics and technical outcomes of ETGBD with conventional ETGBD (C-ETGBD) and Spy- Glass DS-assisted ETGBD (SG-ETGBD) were evaluated. The characteristics and technique-dependent factors of unsuccessful C-ETGBD/SG-ETGBD were evaluated using the classification based on the steps of the procedure. The predictive factors of successful C-ETGBD/SG-ETGBD were examined. Results: C-ETGBD was successful in 73 patients (72.3%). SG-ETGBD was successful in 11 of 13 patients (84.6%) who had C-ETGBD failure. Optional SG-ETGBD significantly increased the final success rate (94.1%) compared to C-ETGBD alone (p=0.003). ETGBD procedures could be classified into four steps. SG-assistance worked as an excellent troubleshooter in step 1 (failure to identify the cystic duct orifice) and step 2 (failure of guidewire advancement across the downturned angle of cystic duct takeoff). Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography could provide predictive information based on the classification. Conclusions: Optional SG-ETGBD achieved a significantly higher success rate than C-ETGBD alone. Step classification is helpful for determining the technical difficulty of ETGBD and developing a theoretical strategy to apply cholangioscopy in a coordinated manner.
참고문헌 (30)
- Okamoto K, "Tokyo Guidelines 2018 : flowchart for the management of acute cholecystitis", J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 25, pp.55~72 (2018)
- Wakabayashi G, "Tokyo Guidelines 2018 : surgical management of acute cholecystitis : safe steps in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis(with videos)", J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 25, pp.73~86 (2018)
- Mori Y, "Tokyo Guidelines 2018 : management strategies for gallbladder drainage in patients with acute cholecystitis(with videos)", J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 25, pp.87~95 (2018)
- Melin MM, "Percutaneous cholecystostomy : a valuable technique in highrisk patients with presumed acute cholecystitis", Br J Surg, 82, pp.1274~1277 (1995)
- Kiviniemi H, "Percutaneous cholecystostomy in acute cholecystitis in high-risk patients : an analysis of 69 patients", Int Surg, 83, pp.299~302 (1998)
- Tsutsui K, "Usefulness of single and repetitive percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder aspiration for the treatment of acute cholecystitis", J Gastroenterol, 42, pp.583~588 (2007)
- Komatsu S, "Role of percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder aspiration in the early management of acute cholecystitis", J Dig Dis, 15, pp.669~675 (2014)
- Komatsu S, "Current role of percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder aspiration : from palliative to curative management for acute cholecystitis", J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 23, pp.708~714 (2016)
- Itoi T, "Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage in patients with acute cholecystitis in whom percutaneous transhepatic approach is contraindicated or anatomically impossible(with video)", Gastrointest Endosc, 68, pp.455~460 (2008)
- Itoi T, "Endoscopic nasogallbladder tube or stent placement in acute cholecystitis : a preliminary prospective randomized trial in Japan(with videos)", Gastrointest Endosc, 81, pp.111~118 (2015)
- Khan MA, "Efficacy and safety of endoscopic gallbladder drainage in acute cholecystitis: is it better than percutaneous gallbladder drainage?", Gastrointest Endosc, 85, pp.76~87 (2017)
- McCarthy ST, "Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder stent placement is safe and effective in high-risk patients without cirrhosis", Dig Dis Sci, 60, pp.2516~2522 (2015)
- Mutignani M, "Endoscopic gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis : technical and clinical results", Endoscopy, 41, pp.539~546 (2009)
- Pannala R, "Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage : 10-year single center experience", Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol, 54, pp.107~113 (2008)
- Kjaer DW, "Endoscopic gallbladder drainage of patients with acute cholecystitis", Endoscopy, 39, pp.304~308 (2007)
- Mohan BP, "Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage, transpapillary drainage, or percutaneous drainage in high risk acute cholecystitis patients : a systematic review and comparative meta-analysis", Endoscopy, 52, pp.96~106 (2020)
- Barkay O, "Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage with the SpyGlass cholangiopancreatoscopy system", Gastrointest Endosc, 70, pp.1039~1040 (2009)
- Ellen Gutkin, "The Successful Treatment of Chronic Cholecystitis with SpyGlass Cholangioscopy-Assisted Gallbladder Drainage and Irrigation through Self- Expandable Metal Stents", Gut and Liver, 6(1), pp.136~138 (2012), 거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회
- Shin JU, "Endoscopic naso-gallbladder drainage by using cholangioscopy for acute cholecystitis combined with cholangitis or choledocholithiasis(with video)", Gastrointest Endosc, 76, pp.1052~1055 (2012)
- Tyberg A, "Digital cholangioscopy-assisted gallbladder drainage : seeing is accessing", Endoscopy, 47(Suppl 1 UCTN), pp.E417~ (2015)
- Chen YK, "Single-operator cholangioscopy in patients requiring evaluation of bile duct disease or therapy of biliary stones(with videos)", Gastrointest Endosc, 74, pp.805~814 (2011)
- Navaneethan U, "Single-operator cholangioscopy and targeted biopsies in the diagnosis of indeterminate biliary strictures : a systematic review", Gastrointest Endosc, 82, pp.608~614 (2015)
- Kurihara T, "Diagnostic and therapeutic single-operator cholangiopancreatoscopy in biliopancreatic diseases : prospective multicenter study in Japan", World J Gastroenterol, 22, pp.1891~1901 (2016)
- Yokoe M, "Tokyo Guidelines 2018 : diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholecystitis(with videos)", J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 25, pp.41~54 (2018)
- Cotton PB, "Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management : an attempt at consensus", Gastrointest Endosc, 37, pp.383~393 (1991)
- Yoshida M, "Novel technique for intraductal cholangioscopy-assisted biliary drainage with over-the-wire microcatheter manipulation", Endoscopy, 51, pp.E398~ (2019)
- Miyabe K, "Successful endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder stenting using a new easily maneuverable guidewire : a report of two cases", Endoscopy, 51, pp.E349~ (2019)
- Jang JW, "Feasibility and safety of EUS-guided transgastric", transduodenal gallbladder drainage with single-step placement of a modified covered self-expandable metal stent in patients unsuitable for cholecystectomy, 2011, pp.74, 176~181
- Jang JW, "Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural and percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage are comparable for acute cholecystitis", Gastroenterology, 142, pp.805~811 (2012)
- Anderloni A, "Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural stenting for gallbladder drainage in high-risk patients with acute cholecystitis : a systematic review and pooled analysis", Surg Endosc, 30, pp.5200~5208 (2016)