Current Practice Patterns of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Sampling for Pancreatic Solid Mass in Korea: Outcomes of a National Survey
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background/Aims: Although endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) and fine needle biopsy (FNB) are widely used for tissue acquisition of pancreatic solid mass, the optimal strategy of this procedure has not been established yet. The aim of this nationwide study was to investigate the current practice patterns of EUS-FNA/FNB for pancreatic solid mass in Korea. Methods: The Policy-Quality Management of the Korean Pancreatobiliary Association (KPBA) developed a questionnaire containing 22 questions. An electronic survey consisting of the questionnaire was distributed by e-mail to members registered to the KPBA. Results: A total of 101 respondents completed the survey. Eighty respondents (79.2%) performed preoperative EUS-FNA/FNB for operable pancreatic solid mass. Acquire needles (60.4%) were used the most, followed by ProCore needles (47.5%). In terms of need size, most respondents (>80%) preferred 22-gauge needles regardless of the location of the mass. Negative suction with a 10-mL syringe (71.3%) as sampling technique was followed by stylet slow-pull (41.6%). More than three needle passes for EUS-FNA/FNB was performed by most respondents (>80%). The frequency of requiring repeated procedure was significantly higher in respondents with a low individual volume (<5 per month, p=0.001). Prophylactic antibiotics were routinely used in 39 respondents (38.6%); rapid on-site pathologic evaluation was used in 6.1%. Conclusions: According to this survey, practices of EUS-FNA/FNB for pancreatic solid mass varied substantially, some of which differed considerably from the recommendations present in existing guidelines. These results suggest that the development of evidence-based quality guidelines fitting Korean clinical practice is needed to establish the optimal strategy for this procedure.
Abstract
Background/Aims: Although endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) and fine needle biopsy (FNB) are widely used for tissue acquisition of pancreatic solid mass, the optimal strategy of this procedure has not been established yet. The aim of this nationwide study was to investigate the current practice patterns of EUS-FNA/FNB for pancreatic solid mass in Korea. Methods: The Policy-Quality Management of the Korean Pancreatobiliary Association (KPBA) developed a questionnaire containing 22 questions. An electronic survey consisting of the questionnaire was distributed by e-mail to members registered to the KPBA. Results: A total of 101 respondents completed the survey. Eighty respondents (79.2%) performed preoperative EUS-FNA/FNB for operable pancreatic solid mass. Acquire needles (60.4%) were used the most, followed by ProCore needles (47.5%). In terms of need size, most respondents (>80%) preferred 22-gauge needles regardless of the location of the mass. Negative suction with a 10-mL syringe (71.3%) as sampling technique was followed by stylet slow-pull (41.6%). More than three needle passes for EUS-FNA/FNB was performed by most respondents (>80%). The frequency of requiring repeated procedure was significantly higher in respondents with a low individual volume (<5 per month, p=0.001). Prophylactic antibiotics were routinely used in 39 respondents (38.6%); rapid on-site pathologic evaluation was used in 6.1%. Conclusions: According to this survey, practices of EUS-FNA/FNB for pancreatic solid mass varied substantially, some of which differed considerably from the recommendations present in existing guidelines. These results suggest that the development of evidence-based quality guidelines fitting Korean clinical practice is needed to establish the optimal strategy for this procedure.
참고문헌 (35)
- Ngamruengphong S, "EUS and survival in patients with pancreatic cancer : a population-based study", Gastrointest Endosc, 72, pp.78~83 (2010)
- Othman MO, "The role of endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis and management of pancreatic cancer", Gastroenterol Clin North Am, 41, pp.179~188 (2012)
- Li H, "Fine needle biopsy is superior to fine needle aspiration in endoscopic ultrasound guided sampling of pancreatic masses: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials", Medicine(Baltimore), 97, pp.e0207~ (2018)
- Facciorusso A, "Comparison between 22G aspiration and 22G biopsy needles for EUS-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions : a meta-analysis", Endosc Ultrasound, 9, pp.167~174 (2020)
- Haseeb A, "Comparing endoscopic ultrasound-guided core biopsies of solid pancreatic and extrapancreatic lesions : a large single-operator experience with a new fine-needle biopsy needle", Ann Gastroenterol, 31, pp.742~746 (2018)
- Shinya Fujie, "Comparison of the Diagnostic Yield of the Standard 22-Gauge Needle and the New 20-Gauge Forward-Bevel Core Biopsy Needle for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition from Pancreatic Lesions", Gut and Liver, 13(3), pp.349~355 (2019), 거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회[DOI]
- Lee YN, "Core biopsy needle versus standard aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasoundguided sampling of solid pancreatic masses : a randomized parallel-group study", Endoscopy, 46, pp.1056~1062 (2014)
- Tian G, "Systematic review and metaanalysis of diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound(EUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration(FNA)using 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles for pancreatic masses", Med Sci Monit, 24, pp.8333~8341 (2018)
- Lee KY, "Efficacy of 3 fine-needle biopsy techniques for suspected pancreatic malignancies in the absence of an on-site cytopathologist", Gastrointest Endosc, 89, pp.825~831 (2019)
- Yang MJ, "Endoscopic ultrasoundguided sampling of solid pancreatic masses : 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles", BMC Gastroenterol, 15, pp.122~ (2015)
- Kandel P, "EUS-guided fine needle biopsy sampling using a novel fork-tip needle : a case-control study", Gastrointest Endosc, 84, pp.1034~1039 (2016)
- Bang JY, "In memoriam : fine-needle aspiration, birth : fine-needle biopsy : the changing trend in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition", Dig Endosc, 31, pp.197~202 (2019)
- Jae Min Lee, "Slow-Pull Using a Fanning Technique Is More Useful Than the Standard Suction Technique in EUS-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration in Pancreatic Masses", Gut and Liver, 12(3), pp.360~366 (2018), 거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회
- Saxena P, "Stylet slow-pull versus standard suction for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fineneedle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions : a multicenter randomized trial", Endoscopy, 50, pp.497~504 (2018)
- Lee JK, "A prospective comparison of liquid-based cytology and traditional smear cytology in pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration", Acta Cytol, 55, pp.401~407 (2011)
- LeBlanc JK, "A prospective study comparing rapid assessment of smears and ThinPrep for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspirates", Endoscopy, 42, pp.389~394 (2010)
- Facciorusso A, "Comparative accuracy of needle sizes and designs for EUS tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses : a network meta-analysis", Gastrointest Endosc, 90, pp.893~903 (2019)
- Karsenti D, "Comparison of 20-gauge Procore® and 22-gauge Acquire® needles for EUSFNB of solid pancreatic masses : an observational study", Scand J Gastroenterol, 54, pp.499~505 (2019)
- Madhoun MF, "The diagnostic accuracy of 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions : a meta-analysis", Endoscopy, 45, pp.86~92 (2013)
- Affolter KE, "Needle size has only a limited effect on outcomes in EUSguided fine needle aspiration : a systematic review and metaanalysis", Dig Dis Sci, 58, pp.1026~1034 (2013)
- Kong F, "Rapid on-site evaluation does not improve endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration adequacy in pancreatic masses : a meta-analysis and systematic review", PLoS One, 11, pp.e0163056~ (2016)
- Ishigaki Kazunaga, "Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition by 22-Gauge Franseen and Standard Needles for Solid Pancreatic Lesions", Gut and Liver, 14(6), pp.817~825 (2020), 거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회[DOI]
- Nakai Yousuke, "A Meta-analysis of Slow Pull versus Suction for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition", Gut and Liver, 15(4), pp.625~633 (2021), 거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회[DOI]
- Polkowski M, "Technical aspects of endoscopic ultrasound(EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology : European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy(ESGE)Technical Guideline-March 2017", Endoscopy, 49, pp.989~1006 (2017)
- Pitman MB, "Guidelines for pancreaticobiliary cytology from the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology : a review", Cancer Cytopathol, 122, pp.399~411 (2014)
- Brugge W, "Techniques for cytologic sampling of pancreatic and bile duct lesions", Diagn Cytopathol, 42, pp.333~337 (2014)
- Guo J, "An international, multiinstitution survey on performing EUS-FNA and fine needle biopsy", Endosc Ultrasound, 9, pp.319~328 (2020)
- van Riet PA, "Mapping international practice patterns in EUS-guided tissue sampling : outcome of a global survey", Endosc Int Open, 4, pp.E360~E370 (2016)
- Beane JD, "Outcomes after preoperative endoscopic ultrasonography and biopsy in patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy", Surgery, 150, pp.844~853 (2011)
- Ngamruengphong S, "Preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration does not impair survival of patients with resected pancreatic cancer", Gut, 64, pp.1105~1110 (2015)
- Oh D, "A comparison between 25-gauge and 22-gauge Franseen needles for endoscopic ultrasoundguided sampling of pancreatic and peripancreatic masses : a randomized non-inferiority study", Endoscopy, 53, pp.1122~1129 (2021)
- Cho E, "A prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trial comparing 25-gauge and 20-gauge biopsy needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic lesions", Surg Endosc, 34, pp.1310~1317 (2020)
- Karsenti D, "22G Acquire vs. 20G Procore needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy of pancreatic masses : a randomized study comparing histologic sample quantity and diagnostic accuracy", Endoscopy, 52, pp.747~753 (2020)
- Crinò SF, "Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy with or without rapid onsite evaluation for diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions : a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial", Gastroenterology, 161, pp.899~909 (2021)
- ASGE Standards of Practice Committee, "Antibiotic prophylaxis for GI endoscopy", Gastrointest Endosc, 81, pp.81~89 (2015)