본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Outcomes of the Conventional versus Pocket-Creation Method for Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Gastric Body Tumors Using a Dual Knife: A Retrospective Study

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Background/Aims: Various endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) methods for gastric tumors have been tried. However, no studies have yet compared results according to the ESD method for gastric body tumors using a dual knife. The objective of this study was to compare outcomes of two ESD methods for gastric body tumors: the pocket-creation method and conventional method. Methods: Patients who underwent ESD for a gastric body tumor were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the ESD method: the conventional method (group I) and pocket-creation method (group II). Characteristics of patients and tumors, hospitalization period, incidence of complications, resection margin status, incidence of surgical operation, procedure time, and laboratory findings were investigated. Results: Of the total of 100 patients, 52 belonged to group I and 48 to group II. All tumors were successfully resected en bloc. Resection margin involvement was found in six (11.5%) of group I and six (12.5%) of group II. Complications were observed in seven (13.5%; major complication five, minor two) of group I and eight (16.7%; major two, minor six) of group II. There were no significant differences in ESD outcomes such as hospitalization period, incidence of complications, resection margin status, incidence of surgical operation, procedure time, or inflammatory response after ESD between the two groups. Conclusions: Both methods are suitable for treating gastric body tumors with adequate treatment success rates and comparable complication rates.

Abstract

Background/Aims: Various endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) methods for gastric tumors have been tried. However, no studies have yet compared results according to the ESD method for gastric body tumors using a dual knife. The objective of this study was to compare outcomes of two ESD methods for gastric body tumors: the pocket-creation method and conventional method. Methods: Patients who underwent ESD for a gastric body tumor were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the ESD method: the conventional method (group I) and pocket-creation method (group II). Characteristics of patients and tumors, hospitalization period, incidence of complications, resection margin status, incidence of surgical operation, procedure time, and laboratory findings were investigated. Results: Of the total of 100 patients, 52 belonged to group I and 48 to group II. All tumors were successfully resected en bloc. Resection margin involvement was found in six (11.5%) of group I and six (12.5%) of group II. Complications were observed in seven (13.5%; major complication five, minor two) of group I and eight (16.7%; major two, minor six) of group II. There were no significant differences in ESD outcomes such as hospitalization period, incidence of complications, resection margin status, incidence of surgical operation, procedure time, or inflammatory response after ESD between the two groups. Conclusions: Both methods are suitable for treating gastric body tumors with adequate treatment success rates and comparable complication rates.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. Oda I, "A multicenter retrospective study of endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer", Gastric Cancer, 9, pp.262~270 (2006)
  2. Toshihiro Nishizawa, "Long-Term Outcomes of Using Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection to Treat Early Gastric Cancer", Gut and Liver, 12(2), pp.119~124 (2018), 거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회
  3. Saito Y, "A prospective, multicenter study of 1111 colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissections(with video)", Gastrointest Endosc, 72, pp.1217~1225 (2010)
  4. Oyama T, "Endoscopic submucosal dissection of early esophageal cancer", Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 3(7 Suppl 1), pp.S67~70 (2005)
  5. Ikezawa N, "Novel strategy using pocket creation method to reduce intraoperative bleeding in gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection", Dig Endosc, 32, pp.e136~e137 (2020)
  6. Chai NL, "Consensus on the digestive endoscopic tunnel technique", World J Gastroenterol, 25, pp.744~776 (2019)
  7. Seiichiro Abe, "Efficacy of Current Traction Techniques for Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection", Gut and Liver, 14(6), pp.673~684 (2020), 거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회[DOI]
  8. Miura Y, "The pocket-creation method of ESD for gastric neoplasms", Gastrointest Endosc, 83, pp.457~458 (2016)
  9. Yamashina T, "Prospective randomized trial comparing the pocket-creation method and conventional method of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection", Gastrointest Endosc, 92, pp.368~379 (2020)
  10. Gong J, "Pocket-creation method improves efficacy of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection : a system review and meta-analysis", Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 33, pp.1241~1246 (2021)
  11. Gong J, "Comparison between tunneling and standard endoscopic submucosal dissection for treatment of large esophageal superficial neoplasm", Acta Gastroenterol Belg, 82, pp.469~474 (2019)
  12. Takizawa K, "A phase II clinical trial of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer of undifferentiated type : Japan Clinical Oncology Group study JCOG1009", 1010, 2013, pp.43, 87~91
  13. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, "Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2018(5th edition)", Gastric Cancer, 24, pp.1~21 (2021)
  14. 박찬혁, "Clinical Practice Guideline for Endoscopic Resection of Early Gastrointestinal Cancer", Clinical Endoscopy, 53(2), pp.142~166 (2020), 대한소화기내시경학회[DOI]
  15. Jung D, "Risk of electrocoagulation syndrome after endoscopic submucosal dissection in the colon and rectum", Endoscopy, 45, pp.714~717 (2013)
  16. Lee H, "Clinical features and predictive factors of coagulation syndrome after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric neoplasm", Gastric Cancer, 15, pp.83~90 (2012)
  17. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, "Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma : 3rd English edition", Gastric Cancer, 14, pp.101~112 (2011)
  18. Ojima T, "Endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection versus conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancers : outcomes of 799 consecutive cases in a single institution", Surg Endosc, 34, pp.5625~5631 (2020)

관련 논문AI추천

Short-Term Outcomes of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Patients with Early Gastric Cancer: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study김광하, 김상균, 김재준, 박선자, 이준행, 임철현, 전훈재, Hwoon-Yong Jung, Il Ju Choi, Ji Hye You, Ji Hyun Kim, Jin-Won Kwon, Ji Young Kim, Joo Young Cho, Na Rae Lee, Sang-Yong Seol, Seung-Hee Park, Wan Sik Lee, Yong Chan Lee거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2016 · 제10권 제5호A Novel One-Step Knife Approach Can Reduce the Submucosal Injection Time of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Single-Blinded Randomized Multicenter Clinical Trials박성철, Baik Gwang Ho, Go Tae-Hwa, Kim Hyunil, Kim Hyun-Soo, Kim Jin Woo, Kim Su Young, Lee Sang Jin, Park Hong Jun거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2022 · 제16권 제1호Comparison between a novel core knife and the conventional IT knife 2 for endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric mucosal lesionsDong Woo Shin, Jin Wook Lee, Jungseok Kim, Ju Yup Lee, Kwang Bum Cho, Myeongsoon Park, Yoo Jin Lee대한소화기내시경학회 · Clinical Endoscopy2022 · 제55권 제6호Routine Mucosal Closure with a Detachable Snare and Clips after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Gastric Epithelial Neoplasms: A Randomized Controlled Trial최황, 김병욱, 김형근, 이보인, 조영석, 지정선, 채현석, 최규용, Sun-Mee Hwang거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2011 · 제5권 제4호Clinical Outcomes of the Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Early Gastric Cancer Are Comparable between Absolute and New Expanded Criteria권중구, 김경옥, 김은수, 김은영, 박경식, 박정배, 박창근, 신근영, 양창헌, 이시형, 장병익, 전성우, 정윤진, 정진태, 조광범거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2015 · 제9권 제2호Efficacy of Current Traction Techniques for Endoscopic Submucosal DissectionHaruhisa Suzuki, Hiroyuki Takamaru, Ichiro Oda, Mai Ego, Masau Sekiguchi, Masayoshi Yamada, Satoru Nonaka, Seiichiro Abe, Shigetaka Yoshinaga, Shih Yea Sylvia Wu, Takahisa Matsuda, Taku Sakamoto, Yutaka Saito거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2020 · 제14권 제6호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (24건)