본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Cost-Utility Analysis of Non-Contrast Abbreviated Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance in Cirrhosis

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Background/Aims: Ultrasonography has a low sensitivity for detecting early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhotic patients. Non-contrast abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging (aMRI) demonstrated a comparable performance to that of magnetic resonance imaging without the risk of contrast media exposure and at a lower cost than that of full diagnostic MRI. We aimed to investigate the cost-effectiveness of non-contrast aMRI for HCC surveillance in cirrhotic patients, using ultrasonography with alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) as a reference. Methods: Cost-utility analysis was performed using a Markov model in Thailand and the United States. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated using the total costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained in each strategy. Surveillance protocols were considered cost-effective based on a willingness-to-pay value of $4,665 (160,000 Thai Baht) in Thailand and $50,000 in the United States. Results: aMRI was cost-effective in both countries with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of $3,667/QALY in Thailand and $37,062/QALY in the United States. Patient-level microsimulations showed consistent findings that aMRI was cost-effective in both countries. By probabilistic sensitivity analysis, aMRI was found to be more cost-effective than combined ultrasonography and AFP with a probability of 0.77 in Thailand and 0.98 in the United States. By sensitivity analyses, annual HCC incidence was revealed as the most influential factor affecting cost-effectiveness. The cost-effectiveness of aMRI increased in settings with a higher HCC incidence. At a higher HCC incidence, aMRI would remain cost-effective at a higher aMRI-to-ultrasonography with AFP cost ratio. Conclusions: Compared to ultrasonography with AFP, non-contrast aMRI is a cost-effective strategy for HCC surveillance and may be useful for such surveillance in cirrhotic patients, especially in those with high HCC risks.

Abstract

Background/Aims: Ultrasonography has a low sensitivity for detecting early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhotic patients. Non-contrast abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging (aMRI) demonstrated a comparable performance to that of magnetic resonance imaging without the risk of contrast media exposure and at a lower cost than that of full diagnostic MRI. We aimed to investigate the cost-effectiveness of non-contrast aMRI for HCC surveillance in cirrhotic patients, using ultrasonography with alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) as a reference. Methods: Cost-utility analysis was performed using a Markov model in Thailand and the United States. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated using the total costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained in each strategy. Surveillance protocols were considered cost-effective based on a willingness-to-pay value of $4,665 (160,000 Thai Baht) in Thailand and $50,000 in the United States. Results: aMRI was cost-effective in both countries with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of $3,667/QALY in Thailand and $37,062/QALY in the United States. Patient-level microsimulations showed consistent findings that aMRI was cost-effective in both countries. By probabilistic sensitivity analysis, aMRI was found to be more cost-effective than combined ultrasonography and AFP with a probability of 0.77 in Thailand and 0.98 in the United States. By sensitivity analyses, annual HCC incidence was revealed as the most influential factor affecting cost-effectiveness. The cost-effectiveness of aMRI increased in settings with a higher HCC incidence. At a higher HCC incidence, aMRI would remain cost-effective at a higher aMRI-to-ultrasonography with AFP cost ratio. Conclusions: Compared to ultrasonography with AFP, non-contrast aMRI is a cost-effective strategy for HCC surveillance and may be useful for such surveillance in cirrhotic patients, especially in those with high HCC risks.

참고문헌 (61)

  1. Sung H, "Global cancer statistics 2020 : GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries", CA Cancer J Clin, 71, pp.209~249 (2021)
  2. De Toni EN, "Age independent survival benefit for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)without metastases at diagnosis : a population-based study", Gut, 69, pp.168~176 (2020)
  3. Marrero JA, "Diagnosis, staging, and management of hepatocellular carcinoma : 2018 practice guidance by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases", Hepatology, 68, pp.723~750 (2018)
  4. Tzartzeva K, "Surveillance imaging and alpha fetoprotein for early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis : a meta-analysis", Gastroenterology, 154, pp.1706~1718 (2018)
  5. Yu NC, "CT and MRI improve detection of hepatocellular carcinoma, compared with ultrasound alone, in patients with cirrhosis", Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 9, pp.161~167 (2011)
  6. Hanna RF, "Comparative 13-year meta-analysis of the sensitivity and positive predictive value of ultrasound, CT, and MRI for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma", Abdom Radiol(NY), 41, pp.71~90 (2016)
  7. Park HJ, "Non-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging as a surveillance tool for hepatocellular carcinoma : Comparison with ultrasound", J Hepatol, 72, pp.718~724 (2020)
  8. Gupta P, "Abbreviated MRI for hepatocellular carcinoma screening : a systematic review and meta-analysis", J Hepatol, 75, pp.108~119 (2021)
  9. Singal AG, "Effectiveness of hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance in patients with cirrhosis", Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 21, pp.793~799 (2012)
  10. Chan MV, "Noncontrast MRI for hepatocellular carcinoma detection : a systematic review and meta-analysis : a potential surveillance tool?", Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 20, pp.44~56 (2022)
  11. Arguedas MR, "Screening for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with hepatitis C cirrhosis : a cost-utility analysis", Am J Gastroenterol, 98, pp.679~690 (2003)
  12. Goossens N, "Cost-effectiveness of risk score-stratified hepatocellular carcinoma screening in patients with cirrhosis", Clin Transl Gastroenterol, 8, pp.e101~ (2017)
  13. Husereau D, "Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022(CHEERS 2022)statement : updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations", Value Health, 25, pp.3~9 (2022)
  14. European Association for the Study of the Liver, "EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines : management of hepatocellular carcinoma", J Hepatol, 69, pp.182~236 (2018)
  15. "Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program" (2022)[URL]
  16. Yang JD, "Impact of country of birth on age at the time of diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States", Cancer, 123, pp.81~89 (2017)
  17. Omata M, "Asia-Pacific clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma : a 2017 update", Hepatol Int, 11, pp.317~370 (2017)
  18. Fattovich G, "Natural history of chronic hepatitis B : special emphasis on disease progression and prognostic factors", J Hepatol, 48, pp.335~352 (2008)
  19. Ioannou GN, "Incidence and predictors of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis", Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 5, pp.938~945 (2007)
  20. Toh MR, "Global epidemiology and genetics of hepatocellular carcinoma", Gastroenterology, 164, pp.766~782 (2023)
  21. Orci LA, "Incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease : a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression", Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 20, pp.283~292 (2022)
  22. Ganne-Carrié N, "Estimate of hepatocellular carcinoma incidence in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis", J Hepatol, 69, pp.1274~1283 (2018)
  23. Kim HL, "Magnetic resonance imaging is cost-effective for hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance in high-risk patients with cirrhosis", Hepatology, 69, pp.1599~1613 (2019)
  24. Cadier B, "Early detection and curative treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma : a cost-effectiveness analysis in France and in the United States", Hepatology, 65, pp.1237~1248 (2017)
  25. Teerawattananon Y, "The use of economic evaluation for guiding the pharmaceutical reimbursement list in Thailand", Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes, 108, pp.397~404 (2014)
  26. Neumann PJ, "Updating cost-effectiveness : the curious resilience of the $50, 000-per-QALY threshold", N Engl J Med, 371, pp.796~797 (2014)
  27. Gold MR, "Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine" (1996), Oxford University Press
  28. Chaikledkaew U, "Guidelines for health technology assessment in Thailand(second edition) : the development process", J Med Assoc Thai, 97(Suppl 5), pp.S4~S9 (2014)
  29. Parikh ND, "Costeffectiveness of hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance : an assessment of benefits and harms", Am J Gastroenterol, 115, pp.1642~1649 (2020)
  30. Besa C, "Hepatocellular carcinoma detection : diagnostic performance of a simulated abbreviated MRI protocol combining diffusion-weighted and T1-weighted imaging at the delayed phase post gadoxetic acid", Abdom Radiol(NY), 42, pp.179~190 (2017)
  31. Marqueen KE, "Cost-effectiveness analysis of selective internal radiotherapy with yttrium-90 versus sorafenib in locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma", JCO Oncol Pract, 17, pp.e266~e277 (2021)
  32. Reiss KA, "Starting dose of sorafenib for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma : a retrospective, multi-institutional study", J Clin Oncol, 35, pp.3575~3581 (2017)
  33. "Health & drug plans" (2023)[URL]
  34. Su D, "Cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab vs sorafenib as first-line treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma", JAMA Netw Open, 4, pp.e210037~ (2021)
  35. Siegel JE, "Recommendations for reporting cost-effectiveness analyses. Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine", JAMA, 276, pp.1339~1341 (1996)
  36. McLernon DJ, "Health-state utilities in liver disease : a systematic review", Med Decis Making, 28, pp.582~592 (2008)
  37. Lima PH, "Cost-utility analysis of imaging for surveillance and diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma", AJR Am J Roentgenol, 213, pp.17~25 (2019)
  38. McKay A, "A cost-utility analysis of treatments for malignant liver tumours : a pilot project", HPB(Oxford), 9, pp.42~51 (2007)
  39. Cucchetti A, "Cost-effectiveness of semi-annual surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients of the Italian Liver Cancer population", J Hepatol, 56, pp.1089~1096 (2012)
  40. Leung HW, "Cost-effectiveness of sorafenib versus SBRT for unresectable advanced hepatocellular carcinoma", Radiat Oncol, 11, pp.69~ (2016)
  41. Cammà C, "Cost-effectiveness of sorafenib treatment in field practice for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma", Hepatology, 57, pp.1046~1054 (2013)
  42. Kim SY, "MRI with liver-specific contrast for surveillance of patients with cirrhosis at high risk of hepatocellular carcinoma", JAMA Oncol, 3, pp.456~463 (2017)
  43. Chaiteerakij R, "Surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma reduces mortality : an inverse probability of treatment weighted analysis", Ann Hepatol, 16, pp.421~429 (2017)
  44. Cabrera R, "A real-world observational cohort of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma : design and rationale for TARGET-HCC", Hepatol Commun, 5, pp.538~547 (2020)
  45. Kanwal F, "Potentially curative treatment in patients with hepatocellular cancer : results from the liver cancer research network", Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 36, pp.257~265 (2012)
  46. Kuo KL, "Treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma stratified by stage-guided treatment categories", J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 13, pp.987~994 (2015)
  47. Park JW, "Global patterns of hepatocellular carcinoma management from diagnosis to death : the BRIDGE Study", Liver Int, 35, pp.2155~2166 (2015)
  48. "The Standard Cost List for Health Technology Assessment" (2023)[URL]
  49. "Medical Expense Database" (2023)[URL]
  50. "Physician Fee Schedule" (2023)[URL]
  51. European Association for the Study of the Liver, "EASLEORTC clinical practice guidelines : management of hepatocellular carcinoma", J Hepatol, 56, pp.908~943 (2012)
  52. Kaplan RM, "Health-related quality of life measurement for evaluation research and policy analysis", Health Psychol, 1, pp.61~80 (1982)
  53. Kanwal F, "Risk of hepatocellular cancer in HCV patients treated with direct-acting antiviral agents", Gastroenterology, 153, pp.996~1005 (2017)
  54. Vandecaveye V, "Diffusionweighted MRI provides additional value to conventional dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for detection of hepatocellular carcinoma", Eur Radiol, 19, pp.2456~2466 (2009)
  55. Yen YH, "Adherence to the modified Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer guidelines : results from a high-volume liver surgery center in East Asias", PLoS One, 16, pp.e0249194~ (2021)
  56. Nguyen MH, "Gaps in hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance in a United States cohort of insured patients with cirrhosis", Curr Med Res Opin, 38, pp.2163~2173 (2022)
  57. Hosaka T, "Long-term entecavir treatment reduces hepatocellular carcinoma incidence in patients with hepatitis B virus infection", Hepatology, 58, pp.98~107 (2013)
  58. Demirtas CO, "ALBI grade : evidence for an improved model for liver functional estimation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma", JHEP Rep, 3, pp.100347~ (2021)
  59. Zhang BH, "Randomized controlled trial of screening for hepatocellular carcinoma", J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 130, pp.417~422 (2004)
  60. Papatheodoridis G, "PAGE-B predicts the risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma in Caucasians with chronic hepatitis B on 5-year antiviral therapy", J Hepatol, 64, pp.800~806 (2016)
  61. Velázquez RF, "Prospective analysis of risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with liver cirrhosis", Hepatology, 37, pp.520~527 (2003)

관련 논문AI추천

간암 감시검사의 비용-효과분석: 체계적 문헌고찰서재경, 신상진, 양장미, 최하진한국보건의료기술평가학회 · 보건의료기술평가2017 · 제5권 제1호Non-Contrast Abbreviated Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Cost-Effective Rookie in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance for Cirrhotic PatientsChoi Won-Mook, Heo Subin거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2024 · 제18권 제1호Cost-Effectiveness of Liver Cancer Screening in Adults at High Risk for Liver Cancer in the Republic of Korea김연남, 남정모, 박은철, 서민아, 이영화, 이후연, 전재관, 조우현, 최귀선대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2014 · 제46권 제3호Hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance in the 21st century: Saving lives or causing harm?Amit G. Singal, Ibrahim A. Hanouneh, Naim Alkhouri대한간학회 · Clinical and Molecular Hepatology2019 · 제25권 제3호Alternative Surveillance Improves Outcomes by Detecting Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Chronic Hepatitis B PatientsCho Eun Ju, Cho Heejin, Kim Yoon Jun, Lee Dong Ho, Lee Jeong-Hoon, Lee Yun Bin, Park Min Kyung, Yoon Jung-Hwan, Yu Su Jong거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2025 · 제19권 제5호Effectiveness of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance and an Optimal Surveillance Interval: Nationwide Cohort of Korea박미숙, 박수미, 배희진, 이상아, 최종원, 황신혜연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2021 · 제62권 제8호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (22건)