본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A Novel Retractable Robotic Device for Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Background/Aims: Appropriate tissue tension and clear visibility of the dissection area using traction are essential for effective and safe endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). In this study, we developed a retractable robot-assisted traction device and evaluated its performance in colorectal ESD. Methods: An experienced endoscopist performed ESD 18 times on an ex vivo porcine colon using the robot and 18 times using the conventional method. The outcome measures were procedure time, dissection speed, procedure-related adverse events, and blind dissection rate. Results: Thirty-six colonic lesions were resected from ex vivo porcine colon samples. The total procedure time was significantly shorter in robot-assisted ESD (RESD) than in conventional ESD (CESD) (20.1±4.1 minutes vs 34.3±8.3 minutes, p<0.05). The submucosal dissection speed was significantly faster in the RESD group than in the CESD group (36.8±9.2 mm2/min vs 18.1±4.7 mm2/min, p<0.05). The blind dissection rate was also significantly lower in the RESD group (12.8%±3.4% vs 35.1%±3.9%, p<0.05). In an in vivo porcine feasibility study, the robotic device was attached to a colonoscope and successfully inserted into the proximal colon without damaging the colonic wall, and ESD was successfully performed. Conclusions: The dissection speed and safety profile improved significantly with the retractable RESD. Thus, our robotic device has the potential to provide simple, effective, and safe multidirectional traction during colonic ESD.

Abstract

Background/Aims: Appropriate tissue tension and clear visibility of the dissection area using traction are essential for effective and safe endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). In this study, we developed a retractable robot-assisted traction device and evaluated its performance in colorectal ESD. Methods: An experienced endoscopist performed ESD 18 times on an ex vivo porcine colon using the robot and 18 times using the conventional method. The outcome measures were procedure time, dissection speed, procedure-related adverse events, and blind dissection rate. Results: Thirty-six colonic lesions were resected from ex vivo porcine colon samples. The total procedure time was significantly shorter in robot-assisted ESD (RESD) than in conventional ESD (CESD) (20.1±4.1 minutes vs 34.3±8.3 minutes, p<0.05). The submucosal dissection speed was significantly faster in the RESD group than in the CESD group (36.8±9.2 mm2/min vs 18.1±4.7 mm2/min, p<0.05). The blind dissection rate was also significantly lower in the RESD group (12.8%±3.4% vs 35.1%±3.9%, p<0.05). In an in vivo porcine feasibility study, the robotic device was attached to a colonoscope and successfully inserted into the proximal colon without damaging the colonic wall, and ESD was successfully performed. Conclusions: The dissection speed and safety profile improved significantly with the retractable RESD. Thus, our robotic device has the potential to provide simple, effective, and safe multidirectional traction during colonic ESD.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. Yamamoto K, "Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection : recent technical advances for safe and successful procedures", World J Gastrointest Endosc, 7, pp.1114~1128 (2015)
  2. Draganov PV, "Training for complex endoscopic procedures : how to incorporate endoscopic submucosal dissection skills in the West?", Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 8, pp.119~121 (2014)
  3. Fuccio L, "Why attempt en bloc resection of non-pedunculated colorectal adenomas? A systematic review of the prevalence of superficial submucosal invasive cancer after endoscopic submucosal dissection", Gut, 67, pp.1464~1474 (2018)
  4. Uraoka T, "Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in Japan and Western countries", Dig Endosc, 24(Suppl 1), pp.80~83 (2012)
  5. Fukami N, "What we want for ESD is a second hand! Traction method", Gastrointest Endosc, 78, pp.274~276 (2013)
  6. Abe S, "Efficacy of current traction techniques for endoscopic submucosal dissection", Gut Liver, 14, pp.673~684 (2020)
  7. He Y, "Traction with dental floss and endoscopic clip improves trainee success in performing gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD) : a live porcine study(with video)", Surg Endosc, 30, pp.3138~3144 (2016)
  8. Mortagy M, "Magnetic anchor guidance for endoscopic submucosal dissection and other endoscopic procedures", World J Gastroenterol, 23, pp.2883~2890 (2017)
  9. Tsuji K, "Recent traction methods for endoscopic submucosal dissection", World J Gastroenterol, 22, pp.5917~5926 (2016)
  10. Chiu PW, "Colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection using a novel robotic system(with video)", Gastrointest Endosc, 93, pp.1172~1177 (2021)
  11. Mascagni P, "Democratizing endoscopic submucosal dissection : single-operator fully robotic colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in a pig model", Gastroenterology, 156, pp.1569~1571 (2019)
  12. Turiani Hourneaux de Moura D, "Robot-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection versus conventional ESD for colorectal lesions : outcomes of a randomized pilot study in endoscopists without prior ESD experience(with video)", Gastrointest Endosc, 90, pp.290~298 (2019)
  13. Sivananthan A, "The evolution of lower gastrointestinal endoscopy : where are we now?", Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc, 13, pp.2631774520979591~ (2020)
  14. Draganov PV, "Techniques of endoscopic submucosal dissection : application for the Western endoscopist?", Gastrointest Endosc, 78, pp.677~688 (2013)
  15. Yamamoto K, "Endoscopic submucosal dissection using endoclips to assist in mucosal flap formation(novel technique : "clip flap method")", Endoscopy, 44(Suppl 2 UCTN), pp.E334~E335 (2012)
  16. Boškoski I, "Endoscopy robotics : current and future applications", Dig Endosc, 31, pp.119~124 (2019)
  17. Rönnow CF, "Endoscopic submucosal dissection of 301 large colorectal neoplasias : outcome and learning curve from a specialized center in Europe", Endosc Int Open, 6, pp.E1340~E1348 (2018)
  18. Teoh AY, "Ex vivo comparative study using the Endolifter® as a traction device for enhancing submucosal visualization during endoscopic submucosal dissection", Surg Endosc, 27, pp.1422~1427 (2013)
  19. Lambin T, "Endoscopic submucosal dissection : how to be more efficient?", Endosc Int Open, 9, pp.E1720~E1730 (2021)

관련 논문AI추천

A Pilot Study of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Using an Endoscopic Assistive Robot in a Porcine Stomach Model김병곤, Bora Keum, Daehie Hong, Hoon Jai Chun, Hyuk Soon Choi, Jung Min Lee, Jun Ho Hong, Sei Hoon Park, Seung Han Kim거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2019 · 제13권 제4호Robot-Assisted Endoscopic Resection: Current Status and Future DirectionsHung Leng Kaan, Khek Yu Ho거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2020 · 제14권 제2호Efficacy of Current Traction Techniques for Endoscopic Submucosal DissectionHaruhisa Suzuki, Hiroyuki Takamaru, Ichiro Oda, Mai Ego, Masau Sekiguchi, Masayoshi Yamada, Satoru Nonaka, Seiichiro Abe, Shigetaka Yoshinaga, Shih Yea Sylvia Wu, Takahisa Matsuda, Taku Sakamoto, Yutaka Saito거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2020 · 제14권 제6호Robotics for Advanced Therapeutic ColonoscopyJennie Y Y Wong, Khek Yu Ho대한소화기내시경학회 · Clinical Endoscopy2018 · 제51권 제6호Efficacy of the pocket-creation method with a traction device in endoscopic submucosal dissection for residual or recurrent colorectal lesionsAkiko Chino, Akio Nakashima, Chihiro Yasue, Daisuke Ide, Eisuke Nakao, Junki Tokura, Junko Fujisaki, Keigo Suzuki, Masahiro Igarashi, Masayuki Saruta, Mitsuaki Ishioka, Seiichi Yakabi, Shoichi Saito, Tomohiko Richard Ohya, Yuki Mitsuyoshi, Yuri Enomoto대한소화기내시경학회 · Clinical Endoscopy2022 · 제55권 제5호The development of robotic flexible endoscopic platformsSun Gyo Lim소화기인터벤션의학회 · International Journal of Gastrointestinal Intervention2020 · 제9권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (24건)