본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Libertas philosophandi and Cloistered Women in Margaret Cavendish’s The Convent of Pleasure

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

This essay explores Margaret Cavendish’s The Convent of Pleasure (1668) as a vindication of the liberty of mind for early modern women for its own sake, a distinguishing feature from other ‘female academy’ proposals or fictions including those of much later dates. The notion of cloistered female communities was abhorred in Protestant England for their associations with Catholic monasticism and female celibacy, while few missed old nunneries except as a place to conveniently lock away “their withered daughters.” Thus proposals of female academies, including Mary Astell’s, routinely faced mockery and censure and relied on the ultimate defense of educating “better Christians.” The Convent of Pleasure is unique in imagining a female society devoted to natural knowledge per se as subject of such knowledge production, at the historical juncture when natural philosophy was being enclosed within all-male spaces such as the Royal Society and its Baconian model Salomon’s House. Lady Happy, founder and Prioress of the Convent, proclaims unapologetically that hers is a “Cloister ... of freedom,” and “not for the gods sake, but for opinion’s sake.” Lady Happy’s Convent stands in elaborate contrast to Salomon’s House, whose “Art” is to “deceive” and coerce nature, and she differentiates her “Wit” from “your Wit” that “measures” and “weighs,” as at the Royal Society. The Convent besieged with intrusive men outside is reminiscent of Bacon’s mandate in Novum Organum for the “true sons of the sciences” to penetrate into nature’s “inner rooms,” but Cavendish subverts this setting to reconfigure the cloistered women as the self-knowing subject, not the object of male gaze and knowledge. One Prince indeed manages to infiltrate, disguised as Princess, but Lady Happy and this Prince/ss’s marriage at the end does not simply signal the Convent’s closure but serves to rebuke the monastic, misogynous, and anti-liberal society of male philosophers.

Abstract

This essay explores Margaret Cavendish’s The Convent of Pleasure (1668) as a vindication of the liberty of mind for early modern women for its own sake, a distinguishing feature from other ‘female academy’ proposals or fictions including those of much later dates. The notion of cloistered female communities was abhorred in Protestant England for their associations with Catholic monasticism and female celibacy, while few missed old nunneries except as a place to conveniently lock away “their withered daughters.” Thus proposals of female academies, including Mary Astell’s, routinely faced mockery and censure and relied on the ultimate defense of educating “better Christians.” The Convent of Pleasure is unique in imagining a female society devoted to natural knowledge per se as subject of such knowledge production, at the historical juncture when natural philosophy was being enclosed within all-male spaces such as the Royal Society and its Baconian model Salomon’s House. Lady Happy, founder and Prioress of the Convent, proclaims unapologetically that hers is a “Cloister ... of freedom,” and “not for the gods sake, but for opinion’s sake.” Lady Happy’s Convent stands in elaborate contrast to Salomon’s House, whose “Art” is to “deceive” and coerce nature, and she differentiates her “Wit” from “your Wit” that “measures” and “weighs,” as at the Royal Society. The Convent besieged with intrusive men outside is reminiscent of Bacon’s mandate in Novum Organum for the “true sons of the sciences” to penetrate into nature’s “inner rooms,” but Cavendish subverts this setting to reconfigure the cloistered women as the self-knowing subject, not the object of male gaze and knowledge. One Prince indeed manages to infiltrate, disguised as Princess, but Lady Happy and this Prince/ss’s marriage at the end does not simply signal the Convent’s closure but serves to rebuke the monastic, misogynous, and anti-liberal society of male philosophers.

참고문헌 (39)

  1. Astell, Mary, "A Serious Proposal to the Ladies" (2002), Broadview
  2. Bacon, Francis, "The Major Works" (2002), OUP
  3. Bacon, Francis, "The New Organon" (2000), CUP
  4. Bonin, Erin Lang, "Margaret Cavendish’s Dramatic Utopias and the Politics of Gender", SEL, 40(2), pp.339~354 (2000)[DOI]
  5. Cavendish, Margaret, "The Convent of Pleasure and Other Plays" (1999), Johns Hopkins UP
  6. Cavendish, Margaret, "Paper Bodies: A Margaret Cavendish Reader" (2000), Broadview
  7. Cavendish, Margaret, "The Female Academy" (2017), Saltar’s Point P
  8. Chalmers, Hero, "The Politics of Feminine Retreat in Margaret Cavendish’s The Female Academy and The Convent of Pleasure", Women’s Writing, 6(1), pp.81~94 (1999)[DOI]
  9. Clucas, Stephen, "A Princely Brave Woman: Essays on Margaret Cavendish, Duchess of Newcastle" (2003), Ashgate
  10. Crawford, Julie, "Convents and Pleasures: Margaret Cavendish and the Drama of Property", Renaissance Drama, 32, pp.177~223 (2003)
  11. Cruz, Anne J., "Women’s Literacy in Early Modern Spain and the New World" (2011), Ashgate
  12. D’Monté, Rebecca, "‘Making a Spectacle’: Margaret Cavendish and the Staging of the Self", pp.109~126
  13. Dodds, Lara, "The Literary Invention of Margaret Cavendish" (2013), Duquesne UP
  14. Eskin, Catherine R., "The Rei(g)ning of Women’s Tongues in English Books of Instruction and Rhetorics", pp.101~132
  15. Hallett, Nicky, "The Senses in Religious Communities, 1600-1800: Early Modern ‘Convents of Pleasure.’" (2013), Routledge
  16. Hill, Bridget, "A Refuge from Men: The Idea of a Protestant Nunnery", Past & Present, 117, pp.107~130 (1987)
  17. Howe, Elizabeth Teresa, "Education and Women in the Early Modern Hispanic World" (2008), Routledge
  18. Howe, Elizabeth Teresa, "‘Let Your Women Keep Silence’: The Pauline Dictum and Women’s Education", pp.123~137
  19. Hutton, Sarah, "Women and Liberty, 1600-1800: Philosophical Essays", pp.123~137 (2017), OUP
  20. Juana Inés de la Cruz, "Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz: Selected Works" (2016), Norton
  21. Kirk, Stephanie L., "Women’s Literacy and Masculine Authority: The Case of Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz and Antonio Núñez de Miranda", pp.139~157, Cruz and Hernández
  22. 이시연, "(Un)dreaming the Celestial New World in The Blazing World and Gulliver’s Travels", 18세기영문학, 14(2), pp.147~183 (2017), 한국18세기영문학회
  23. Lehfeldt, Elizabeth A, "Religious Women in Golden Age Spain : The Permeable Cloister" (2005), Routledge
  24. Merchant, Carolyn, "Science and Nature: Past, Present, and Future" (2018), Routledge
  25. Merchant, Carolyn, "‘The Violence of Impediments’: Francis Bacon and the Origins of Experimentation", Isis, 99, pp.731~760 (2008)
  26. Peacock, Judith, "Writing for the Brain and Writing for the Boards: The Producibility of Margaret Cavendish’s Dramatic Texts", pp.87~108
  27. Pedersen, Tara, "“We shall discover our Selves”: Practicing the Mermaid’s Law in Margaret Cavendish’s The Convent of Pleasure", Early Modern Women, 5, pp.111~135 (2010)
  28. Romack, Katherine, "Cavendish and Shakespeare, Interconnections" (2006), Ashgate
  29. Sanders, Julie, "‘The Closet Opened’: A Reconstruction of ‘Private’ Space in the Writings of Margaret Cavendish", pp.127~140
  30. Shanahan, John, "God and Nature in the Thought of Margaret Cavendish", pp.141~160 (2014), Ashgate
  31. Siegfried, Brandie, "Dining at the Table of Sense: Shakespeare, Cavendish, and The Convent of Pleasure", pp.63~83
  32. Sierra, Horacio, "Convents as Feminist Utopias: Margaret Cavendish’s The Convent of Pleasure and the Potential of Closeted Dramas and Communities", Women’s Studies, 38(6), pp.647~669 (2009)[DOI]
  33. Strocchia, Sharon T, "Learning the Virtues: Convent Schools and Female Culture in Renaissance Florence", pp.3~46
  34. Sutton, Robert B., "The Phrase Libertas Philosophandi", Journal of the History of Ideas, 14(2), pp.310~316 (1953)[DOI]
  35. Tann, Donovan E., "Experimental Science and Speculation in Cavendish’s Convent of Pleasure", SEL, 60(3), pp.463~483 (2020)[DOI]
  36. Walker, Claire, "The Experience of Exile in Early Modern English Convents", Parergon, 34(2), pp.159~177 (2017)[DOI]
  37. Walker, Claire, "‘Going against some forcible wind’: Writing and Reform in Medieval and Early Modern Convents", Journal of Women’s History, 21(1), pp.135~144 (2009)[DOI]
  38. Walters, Lisa, "Margaret Cavendish: Gender, Science and Politics" (2014), CUP
  39. Whitehead, Barbara J., "Women’s Education in Early Modern Europe, 1500-1800" (2013), Routledge

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)