수신사 및 조사시찰단 기록의 범주와 유형
The Study on the Categories of Research Material of Susinsa and Official Observation Mission
2
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
There are lots of materials on Susinsa and Official Observation Mission in Korea and Japan. Although the lists and articles were published by some researchers, we should investigate the data research more, and organize the materials. This research should be more detailed with translation tasks. With this study, you can find aspects of early modern Korean and Japanese mutual perception with a variety of angles through the various layers of materials. As I showed the samples of the data, during Susinsa's duty they had plenty of meetings and the cases of knowledge exchange between Chosun and Meiji Japan. These kinds of exchange can not be identified only report submitted to the King or their own journals. The collection of the two sides of the record which are written conversations and poetry exchanges, letters overcoming space, newspaper articles are very necessary. Moreover, there is little data of susinsa in Korea, so it is urgent to cooperate with Japan when we need to study the various materials. Also, we should look into the data in Japanese perception of Chosun. Through this kind of study, we can rectify the distorted historical consciousness between two countries, and will create a foundation to move into the future-oriented relationship.
Abstract
There are lots of materials on Susinsa and Official Observation Mission in Korea and Japan. Although the lists and articles were published by some researchers, we should investigate the data research more, and organize the materials. This research should be more detailed with translation tasks. With this study, you can find aspects of early modern Korean and Japanese mutual perception with a variety of angles through the various layers of materials. As I showed the samples of the data, during Susinsa's duty they had plenty of meetings and the cases of knowledge exchange between Chosun and Meiji Japan. These kinds of exchange can not be identified only report submitted to the King or their own journals. The collection of the two sides of the record which are written conversations and poetry exchanges, letters overcoming space, newspaper articles are very necessary. Moreover, there is little data of susinsa in Korea, so it is urgent to cooperate with Japan when we need to study the various materials. Also, we should look into the data in Japanese perception of Chosun. Through this kind of study, we can rectify the distorted historical consciousness between two countries, and will create a foundation to move into the future-oriented relationship.
참고문헌 (8)
- 한국고전번역원, "국역 해행총재 15" (2008), 한국학술정보
- 한국고전번역원, "국역 해행총재 16", pp.1~557 (2008), 한국학술정보
- 허동현, "朝士視察團 관계자료집 1-14권" (2000), 국학자료원
- 이효정, "1881년 조사시찰단의 필담 기록에 보이는 한일 교류의 한 양상 - 『三島中洲ㆎ川北梅山ㆎ崔成大筆談録』을 중심으로", 한국문학논총, (56), pp.103~128 (2010), 한국문학회
- 하우봉, "開港期 修信使行에 관한 一硏究", 한일관계사연구, 10, pp.139~167 (1999), 한일관계사학회
- 허경진, "수신사를 통해 본 개화기 한시의 위상 -제1ㆍ2차 수신사의 창수시를 중심으로-", 동북아 문화연구, 1(28), pp.97~116 (2011), 동북아시아문화학회
- 鈴木文, "第一次朝鮮修信使来日時にみる日本人の朝鮮認識と自己認識", 朝鮮史研究会論文集, 45, pp.63~90 (2007), 朝鮮史研究会
- 田保橋清, "近代日鮮關係史の硏究", pp.557~578 (1940), 朝鮮總督府中樞院