동아시아의 근대와 근대 지식인 - 나쓰메 소세키, 루쉰, 이광수 -
The Modern Era of East Asia and Modern Intellectuals - Natsume Soseki, Luxun, and Lee, Kwang-Su
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
この論文では帝国の知識人である夏目漱石、半植民地の知識人である魯迅、植民地の知識人である李光洙と彼らの小説を通して知識人の近代認識とその解決方案について検討した。 帝国の知識人である夏目漱石は『我輩は猫である』で近代文明を批判し、『こころ』では明治精神、すなわち帝国主義を充実に移行する知識人を描いた。魯迅は『阿Q正傳』で精神勝利という方法で、現実をそむけないで、現実を見つめなければならないというメッセージを伝えた。また、彼は『狂人日記』を通して、伝統に抵抗するが結局は挫折し、妥協する知識人を描いた。李光洙は『無情』で知識人が教育を通して一般民衆を啓蒙し、『土』で具体化した。夏目漱石は文明批判と帝国主義を迂回的に、魯迅は革命という主題を暗示的に、李光洙は啓蒙という主題を直接的に表現した。 夏目漱石は文明批判と帝国主義、魯迅は革命、李光洙は啓蒙という近代化に対する方向は違ったが、近代化という究極的な目的は同じであった。彼らは東アジアの近代の方向を彼らの小説を通して具体化した。
Abstract
This paper examined the modern perception of intellectuals and according resolutions through the novels by Natsume Soseki as an intellectual of empire, Lu Xun as an intellectual of semi-colonial and Lee, Kwang-Su as an intellectual of colony. The intellectual of empire Natsume Soseki criticized modern civilization in his novel 『I Am a Cat』. In his novel 『Kokoro』, he portrayed the Meiji spirit namely, intellectuals faithfully fulfilling imperialism. Lu Xun conveyed the message of urging to face the reality rather than turning away from it through spiritual victories in his novel 『The True Story of Ah Q』. In his novel 『A Madman’s Diary』, he was afraid of becoming an intellectual who resists against tradition but eventually becomes frustrated and compromises and hope to be otherwise. Lee, Kwang-Su portrayed an intellectual who educates and enlightens the general public after learning Western knowledge. In his novel 『Moojeong』, an intellectual enlightened the general public through education and it was actualized in 『The Soil』. While Natsume Soseki expresses criticism of civilization and imperialism indirectly, Lee, Kwang-Su expresses the subject of enlightenment forthrightly while Lu Xun expresses the subject of revolution suggestively. The direction of modernization of the three writers varied in regards to criticism of civilization and imperialism by Natusme Soseki, revolution by Lu Xun and enlightenment by Lee, Kwang-Su. However, the ultimate goal of modernization was the same. Their direction of modernization was actualized through their novels.
참고문헌 (21)
- 권혁률, "춘원과 루쉰에 관한 비교문학적 연구", pp.89~ (2007), 역락
- 김언정, "나쓰메 소세키(夏目漱石)의『그 후(それから)』와 이광수의『무정(無情)』에 나타난 근대적 개인의 형성 과정과 성격 비교 연구", 일본문화연구, (39), pp.87~107 (2011), 동아시아일본학회
- 최은정, "아Q정전", pp.61~ (2009), 계명대학교 출판부
- 이광수, "李光洙全集 1", pp.556~558 (1962), 삼중당
- 이광수, "李光洙全集 1", pp.205~ (1962), 삼중당
- 이광수, "李光洙全集 3", pp.30~ (1962), 삼중당
- 이광수, "李光洙全集 4", pp.400~ (1966), 삼중당
- 이광수, "李光洙全集 10", pp.132~ (1971), 삼중당
- 이광수, "李光洙全集 10", pp.88~ (1971), 삼중당
- 정문권, "『무정』과 『광인일기』의 계몽성 연구", 한국언어문학, (77), pp.233~261 (2011), 한국언어문학회
- 조영석, "나쓰메 소세키의 문학세계", pp.14~ (2001), 보고사
- 취안 허 뤼, "루쉰, 춘원과 일본 근대초기의 사소설", 아시아문화연구, 22, pp.173~194 (2011), 아시아문화연구소
- 檜山久雄, "魯迅と漱石", pp.7~8 (1977), 第三文明社
- 夏目漱石, "吾輩は猫である", pp.5~ (1961), 新潮文庫
- 三好行雄, "別冊国文学 No.39․夏目漱石事典", pp.6~ (1990), 学燈社
- 潘世聖, "魯迅、明治日本、漱石ー影響と構造への総合的比較研究", pp.208~ (2002), 汲古書院
- 毛澤東, "毛澤東選集(一卷本)", pp.658~ (1964), 人民出版社
- 魯迅, "魯迅全集 4", pp.512~ (1980), 人民文學出版社
- 魯迅, "魯迅全集 4", pp.511~ (1981), 人民文學出版社
