본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Interpretation of Focus Ambiguity in Sentences with English Focus Particle only

1

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

Kim, Soyoung. 2011. The Interpretation of Focus Ambiguity in Sentences with English Focus Particle Only. The Journal of Studies in Language 27.1, 23-45. This study investigates how children and adults resolve focus ambiguity in sentences containing preverbal only with the help of contexts. The sentences with only were ambiguous between an NP scope analysis (focus assigned to the direct object) and a VP scope analysis (focus assigned to the verb phrase). Using a Truth Value Judgment task (Crain & Thornton 1998), they judged whether sentences with preverbal only were a true description of the event or not. A true/false distinction was determined depending on which scope analysis they adopt. The results showed that contextual support guided adults to access both scope analyses. It also helped children adopt the NP scope analysis that was dispreferred in previous study (Paterson et al. 2006). These results were discussed in relation to a processing account of focus interpretation (Crain et al. 1994)

Abstract

Kim, Soyoung. 2011. The Interpretation of Focus Ambiguity in Sentences with English Focus Particle Only. The Journal of Studies in Language 27.1, 23-45. This study investigates how children and adults resolve focus ambiguity in sentences containing preverbal only with the help of contexts. The sentences with only were ambiguous between an NP scope analysis (focus assigned to the direct object) and a VP scope analysis (focus assigned to the verb phrase). Using a Truth Value Judgment task (Crain & Thornton 1998), they judged whether sentences with preverbal only were a true description of the event or not. A true/false distinction was determined depending on which scope analysis they adopt. The results showed that contextual support guided adults to access both scope analyses. It also helped children adopt the NP scope analysis that was dispreferred in previous study (Paterson et al. 2006). These results were discussed in relation to a processing account of focus interpretation (Crain et al. 1994)

참고문헌 (16)

  1. Altman, Gerry, "Interaction with context during human sentence processing", Cognition, 30, pp.191~238 (1988)
  2. Cooper, Robbie M., "The control of eye fixations by the meaning of spoken language: A new methodology for the real-time investigation of speech perception, memory, and language processing", Cognitive Psychology, 6(1), pp.84~107 (1974)
  3. Crain, Stephen, "Learning, parsing and modularity, In Perspectives on sentence processing" (1994), Lawrence Erlbaum
  4. Crain, Stephen, "On not being led up the garden path: The use of context by the psychological parser, In Natural Language Parsing: Psychological ,Computational and Theoretical Perspectives" (1985), Cambridge University Press
  5. Crain, Stephen, "Investigations in universal grammar: a guide to experiments on the acquisition of syntax and semantics" (1998), MIT Press
  6. Drozd, Kenneth F., "Children’s weak interpretations of universally quantified questions, In Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development", pp.340~376 (2001), Cambridge University Press
  7. Gualmini, Andrea, "Children's insensitivity to contrastive stress in sentences with only. Proceedings of PLC25 (Vol.PWPL8.1)", 87~110 (2003)
  8. Geurts, Bart, "Quantifying kids", Paper presented at the Workshop on Acquisition Perspectives on Interfaces (2001)
  9. Jackendoff, R. S., "Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar" (1972), MIT Press
  10. Johnson-Laird, "Mental models" (1983), Cambridge University Press
  11. Paterson, Kevin B., "Children’s comprehension of sentences with focus particles", Cognition, 89, pp.263~294 (2003)
  12. Paterson, Kevin. B., "Children's interpretation of ambiguous focus in sentences with "only"", Language Acquisition, 13, pp.253~284 (2006)
  13. Reinhart, Tanya, "The syntactic domain of anaphora", pp.1976
  14. Reinhart, Tanya, "Anaphora and semantic interpretation" (1983), Routledge
  15. Rooth, Mats, "A theory of focus interpretation", Natural Language Semantics, 1, pp.75~116 (1992)
  16. Tanenhaus, Michael K., "Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension", Science, 268, pp.1632~1634 (1995)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)