“第二形式”与批评文体的古今差异
The Second Form and the Difference of Style of Literary Criticism between Ancient and Modern
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
“The second form” which is part of Chinese classical literary theory has rich connotation, and the academia’s research of “the second form” which has been limited to “literary style” has not covered “style of literary criticism”. Same as “literary style”, “style of literary criticism” manifest the aesthetics significance of “the second form” by expression, rhetoric, style, and effects. Through employing the theory and method of “the second form”, we can not only disclose the value of form of Chinese classical literary theory, but also supply reference and enlightenment to the creation, acceptance and research of “style of literary criticism” nowadays.
Abstract
“The second form” which is part of Chinese classical literary theory has rich connotation, and the academia’s research of “the second form” which has been limited to “literary style” has not covered “style of literary criticism”. Same as “literary style”, “style of literary criticism” manifest the aesthetics significance of “the second form” by expression, rhetoric, style, and effects. Through employing the theory and method of “the second form”, we can not only disclose the value of form of Chinese classical literary theory, but also supply reference and enlightenment to the creation, acceptance and research of “style of literary criticism” nowadays.
참고문헌 (16)
- 三联书店, "韦勒克", 1984
- 钟嵘著, "诗品" (1958), 人民文学
- 刘勰著, "文心雕龙" (1958), 人民文学
- 六臣注, "文选", ≪四部丛刊≫影宋本, ~
- 刘克庄, "后村先生大集", 四部丛刊, ~
- 严羽著, "沧浪诗话校释" (1983), 人民文学
- 王国维, "王国维遗书" (1983), 上海古籍书店
- 黄侃, "文心雕龙札记" (1996), 华东师范大学
- 郭绍虞主编, "中国历代文论选" (2003), 上海古籍
- 黄霖, "中国文学批评通史ㆍ近代卷" (1996), 上海古籍
- 叶嘉莹, "王国维及其文学批评" (1982), 广东人民
- 王元化, "文心雕龙创作论" (1979), 上海古籍
- 詹瑛, "文心雕龙的风格学" (1982), 人民文学
- 李建中著, "古代文论的诗性空间" (2005), 湖北人民
- 李建中, "中国文论：说什么与怎么说", 长江学术, (1) (2006)
- 李建中, "文学与批评：怎么说比说什么更重要——以几部经典作品为例", 文艺争鸣, (3) (2008)