합성어의 의미와 상황의미(ad hoc concept)
English Compounds and Ad hoc Concept
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The previous studies on English compound words are operated syntactically and semantically, focusing on the headness and semantic relations between the constituents of the English compounds. In Relevance theory, however, the inference of lexical meanings has also the same process as that of the general communication process, so that it should be interpreted based on the contextual information. To make the inference process efficient, the flexible lexical inference is quite necessary such as narrowing, loosening, and metaphorical extension. In this paper, the metaphor or metonym is not treated as a separate category but the series of inferential process. Through inferential process, the meaning of the constituents and the contextual information are integrated conceptually, and then finally constructed through ad hoc concept.
Abstract
The previous studies on English compound words are operated syntactically and semantically, focusing on the headness and semantic relations between the constituents of the English compounds. In Relevance theory, however, the inference of lexical meanings has also the same process as that of the general communication process, so that it should be interpreted based on the contextual information. To make the inference process efficient, the flexible lexical inference is quite necessary such as narrowing, loosening, and metaphorical extension. In this paper, the metaphor or metonym is not treated as a separate category but the series of inferential process. Through inferential process, the meaning of the constituents and the contextual information are integrated conceptually, and then finally constructed through ad hoc concept.
참고문헌 (23)
- 석종환, "영어합성어의 분류", 현대영미어문학, 29(4), pp.105~126 (2011), 현대영미어문학회
- 양정연, "관련성 이론에 의한 영어 광고 분석", 박사, pp.2020
- Bagasheva, A., "Compound Verbs in English Revisited", Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics, 1, pp.125~151 (2011)
- Barsalou, L., "Concepts and Conceptual Development:Encological and Intellectual Factors in Categorization", pp.101~140 (1987), Cambridge University Press
- Bauer, L., "Language Typology and Language Universals", pp.695~707 (2001), Walter de Gruyter
- Benczes, R., "Creative Compounding in English : The Semantics of Metaphorical and Metonymical Noun-Noun Combinations" (2006), John Benjamins
- Bloomfiled, L., "Language" (1993), The University of Chicago Press
- Carston, R., "Metaphor, Ad hoc Concepts and Word Meaning–More Questions than Answers", UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 14, pp.83~105 (2002)
- Carston, R., "Lexical Pragmatics, Ad hoc Concepts and Metaphor : A Relevance Theory Perspective", Italian Journal of Linguistics, 22, pp.157~180 (2010)
- Carston, R., "Ad hoc Concepts, Polysemy and the Lexicon" (2019), Cambridge University Press
- Elly, I., "Newspaper Headlines and Relevance : Ad hoc Concepts in Ad hoc Contexts", Journal of Pragmatics, 41, pp.699~720 (2009)
- Glucksberg, S., "Creative Thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and process", pp.327~350 (1997)
- Grice, H. P., "Syntax and Semantics Vol. 3: Speech Acts", pp.41~58 (1975), Academic Press
- Libben, G., "Compound fracture : The role of semantic transparency and morphological headness", Brain and Language, 84, pp.26~43 (2003)
- Lieber, R., "Handbook of Word-Formation", pp.353~373 (2005), Springe
- Mioduszewska, E., "Relevance, Ad hoc Concepts and Analogy", Linguistics Beyond and Within, 3, pp.155~168 (2017)
- Pragmatics Distinction, "The Semantics", pp.2004, Recanati, F.
- Scalise, S., "Oxford Handbook of Compounding", pp.34~53 (2011), Oxford University Press
- Sperber, D., "Relevance. Language and Cognition" (1986), Blackwell
- Sperber, D., "Experimental Pragmatics" (2004), Palgrave Macmillan
- Williams, E., "On the"Notions Lexically Related"and"Head of a Word"", Linguistic Inquiry, 12(2), pp.245~274 (1981)
- Wilson D., "Pragmatics", pp.230~259 (2007), Palgrave Macmillan
- Wilson, D., "Handbook of Pragmatics", pp.607~632 (2004), Blackwell