본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

과업유형에 따른 고등학교 교사들의 교과서 활용실태분석

Analysis of High School Teachers' Use of English Textbooks Based on Task Types

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

The purpose of this study is to analyse the task type presented in secondary school English textbooks and to show how teachers make use of the textbook in the classroom. Five English textbooks for high-school first graders were chosen and 83 high school English teachers using one of the textbooks were surveyed to investigate which sections of the textbook they usually omit and why they do so. The survey results revealed that the most omitted sections by the teachers were Communicative Activity(81%), Communication(60%), Writing(53%), Further Work (49%), and Speaking(45%). Teachers reported that they omitted them mostly due to lack of time and inappropriateness of the task for the current classroom. Yet, all these sections were characterized to include meaningful tasks or communicative tasks through individual work or pair work. On the other hand, the least omitted sections were Dialog(34%), Review(27%), Listening(24%), Pre-reading(20%) and After-reading(14%), and Pronunciation․Vocabulary․Grammar(12%). These sections, except for Dialog tend to include mechanical tasks through individual work. Further study, limitations, and discussions were followed.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyse the task type presented in secondary school English textbooks and to show how teachers make use of the textbook in the classroom. Five English textbooks for high-school first graders were chosen and 83 high school English teachers using one of the textbooks were surveyed to investigate which sections of the textbook they usually omit and why they do so. The survey results revealed that the most omitted sections by the teachers were Communicative Activity(81%), Communication(60%), Writing(53%), Further Work (49%), and Speaking(45%). Teachers reported that they omitted them mostly due to lack of time and inappropriateness of the task for the current classroom. Yet, all these sections were characterized to include meaningful tasks or communicative tasks through individual work or pair work. On the other hand, the least omitted sections were Dialog(34%), Review(27%), Listening(24%), Pre-reading(20%) and After-reading(14%), and Pronunciation․Vocabulary․Grammar(12%). These sections, except for Dialog tend to include mechanical tasks through individual work. Further study, limitations, and discussions were followed.

참고문헌 (32)

  1. 김해동, "영어 교재의 과업 유형에 대한 학습자의 반응 연구", 12(3), pp.191~214 (2005)
  2. 김해은, "고등학교 영어 교과서 말하기 과업 분석 : 소집단 활동 중심으로" (2004)
  3. 민찬규, "고등학교 1학년 영어교과서에 대한 설문 조사", 2(1), pp.129~149 (2003)
  4. 박미정, "고등학교 영어 교과서 청취 과업 분석" (2003)
  5. 배두본, "영어 교재론 개관 : 이론과 개발" (1999), 서울: 한국문화사
  6. 서진이, "제 7차 교육과정에 따른 고등학교 1학년 영어 교과서의 읽기 과업 분석 연구 :독해의 4단계를 중심으로" (2003)
  7. 신유미, "고교 영어 교과서의 청취 과업 분석" (2005)
  8. 장복명, "제 6차 교육과정과 영어교과서 연구" (1995), 고려대학교
  9. 정선희, "제 7차 교육과정에 따른 말하기 과업 분석:고등학교 1학년 영어 교과서 중심으로" (2005)
  10. 조우영, "고등학교 영어 교과서의 말하기 과업 분석: 1학년 교과서를 중심으로" (2005), 연세대학교
  11. 한정원, "중학교 1학년 영어교과서의 비교 분석 및 평가", 56(4), pp.329~347 (2001)
  12. "고등학교 1학년 영어 교과서의 소집단 활동 비교 분석", 58(4), pp.43~59 (2003)
  13. Berwick, "Towards and Educational Framework for Teacher-led Tasks Tasks in pedagogical context", pp.97~124 (1993)
  14. Breen M, "Learner Contributions to Task Design Lancaster Practical Papers in English Language Education 7" (1987), Prentice Hall
  15. Brown, H.D, "Teaching by Principles" (2001), Longman
  16. Ellis, R., "Task-based Language Learning and Teaching" (2003), Oxford University Press
  17. Foster, P, "The Influence of Planning on Performance in Task-based Learning", 19, pp.299~324 (1996)
  18. Jeon, I, "An Analysis of Task-based Materials and Performance: Focused on Korean High School English Textbooks", 60(2), pp.87~109 (2005)
  19. Long, "New York Academy of Sciences", pp.259~278 (1981)
  20. ed, "A Role for Instruction in Second Language Acquisition" (1985)
  21. Nunan,D, "Designing Tasks for the Communicative Classroom" (1989), Cambridge Language Teaching Library
  22. Park, M, "An Analysis of Korean High School English Textbooks under the 7th Curriculum", 58(4), pp.319~347 (2003)
  23. Richards, "Longman Dictionary of Applied Linguistics" (1985)
  24. Skehan, P, "A Framework for the Implementation of Task-based Instruction", 17(1), pp.38~62 (1996)
  25. Tomlinson, B, "Materials Development in Language Teaching" (1998), Cambridge University Press
  26. Wills, J, "A Framework for Task-based Learning" (1996), Longman
  27. "분석 대상 고등영어 교과서 목록"
  28. 강흥립, "High School English" (2001), 서울(주)대한교과서
  29. 김덕기, "High School English" (2001), 서울(주)금성출판사
  30. 김충배, "High School English" (2001), 서울(주)중앙교육진흥연구소
  31. 이맹성, "High School English" (2001), 서울(주)지학사
  32. 이병민, "High School English" (2001), 서울(주)천재교육

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)