Pragmatic Aspects of Personal Pronouns in Courtroom Discourse
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Aiming to shed light on the under-studied monologic genre of the opening statement, this research explicates how lawyers position themselves in relation to the (overhearing) jurors in the courtroom. Drawing upon the prosecution’s and defense’s opening statements of three high-profile American trials, the study analyzes the use of first- and second-person pronouns. The findings suggest that these pronouns are an integral part of this genre, thereby contributing to making the genre dialogic and interactive. These pronominal devices serve several pragmatic functions, including displaying speaker stance and establishing engagement. As a result, the opening statement becomes argumentative, which stands in stark contrast to the legal requirement of this genre.
Abstract
Aiming to shed light on the under-studied monologic genre of the opening statement, this research explicates how lawyers position themselves in relation to the (overhearing) jurors in the courtroom. Drawing upon the prosecution’s and defense’s opening statements of three high-profile American trials, the study analyzes the use of first- and second-person pronouns. The findings suggest that these pronouns are an integral part of this genre, thereby contributing to making the genre dialogic and interactive. These pronominal devices serve several pragmatic functions, including displaying speaker stance and establishing engagement. As a result, the opening statement becomes argumentative, which stands in stark contrast to the legal requirement of this genre.
참고문헌 (49)
- Atkinson, J.M., "Order in Court: The Organization of Verbal Interaction in Judicial Settings" (1979), Macmillan
- Berman, R, "Introduction: Developing Discourse Stance in Different Text Types and Languages", Journal of Pragmatics, 37(2), pp.105~124 (2004)
- Biber, D., "Adverbial Stance Types in English", Discourse Processes, 11(1), pp.1~34 (1988)
- Brown, R., "Style in Language", pp.253~276 (1960), MIT Press
- Chaemsaithong, K, "Performing Self on the Witness Stand: Stance and Relational Work in Expert Witness Testimony", Discourse & Society, 23(5), pp.465~486 (2012)
- Danet, B, "Language in the Legal Process", Law and Society Review, 15, pp.445~565 (1980)
- Drew, P., "Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings", pp.470~520 (1992), Cambridge University Press
- Duszak, A, "Us and Others: Social Identities across Languages, Discourses and Cultures" (2002), John Benjamins
- Fitzsimons, G., "Language and Interpersonal Cognition: Causal Effects of Variations in Pronoun Usage on Perceptions of Closeness", Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(5), pp.547~557 (2004)
- Goffman, E., "Forms of Talk", pp.124~159 (1981), University of Pennsylvania Press
- Halliday, M. A. K., "Systematic Functional Linguistics: Exploring Choice", pp.15~36 (2013), Cambridge University Press
- Harris, S, "Fragmented Narratives and Multiple Tellers: Witness and Defendant Accounts in Trials", Discourse Studies, 3(1), pp.53~74 (2001)
- Harris, S., "The Sociolinguistics of Narratives", pp.215~237 (2005), John Benjamins
- Hobbs, P, "‘Is That What We’re Here about?’: A Lawyer’s Use of Impression Management in a Closing Argument at Trial", Discourse & Society, 14(3), pp.273~290 (2003)
- Hobbs, P, "‘It’s Not What You Say But How You Say It’: The Role of Personality and Identity in Trial Success", Critical Discourse Studies, 5(3), pp.231~248 (2008)
- Holmes, J, "Generic Pronouns in the Wellington Corpus of Spoken New Zealand English", Kotare, 1(1), pp.32~40 (1998)
- Hyland, K, "Authority and Invisibility: Authorial Identity in Academic Writing", Journal of Pragmatics, 34, pp.1191~1121 (2001)
- Hyland, K, "Stance and Engagement: A Model of Interaction in Academic Discourse", Discourse Studies, 7(2), pp.173~192 (2005)
- Kitagawa, C, "Impersonal Uses of Personal Pronouns", Journal of Pragmatics, 14(5), pp.739~759 (1990)
- Kuo, S, "From Solidarity to Antagonism: The Uses of the Second-Person Singular Pronoun in Chinese Political Discourse", Text, 22(1), pp.29~55 (2002)
- Lind, A., "The Psychology of Evidence and Trial Procedure", pp.229~253 (1985), Sage
- Mao, L, "Chinese First Person Pronoun and Social Implicature", Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 7(3-4), pp.106~128 (1996)
- Matoesian, G., "Law and the Language of Identity: Discourse in the William Kennedy Smith Rape Trial" (1999), Oxford University Press
- Matoesian, G, "Nailing Down an Answer: Participants of Power in Trial Talk", Discourse Studies, 7(6), pp.733~759 (2005)
- Mauet, T., "Fundamentals of Trial Technique" (1980), Little Brown
- Mauranen, A., "Corpus Analysis: Language Structure and Language Use", pp.19~34 (2003), Rodopi
- Meyers, M, "Current Generic Pronoun Usage", American Speech, 65(3), pp.228~237 (1990)
- Newman, M. L., "Lying Words: Predicting Deception from Linguistic Styles", Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(5), pp.665~675 (2003)
- Ostermann, A, "Localizing Power and Solidarity: Pronoun Alternation at an all-Female Police Station and a Feminist Crisis Intervention Center in Brazil", Language in Society, 32(3), pp.351~381 (2003)
- Pascual, E., "Imaginary Trialogues: Conceptual Blending and Fictive Interaction in Criminal Courts", Utrecht: LOT, 68 (2002)
- Penman R, "Facework and Politeness: Multiple Goals in Courtroom Discourse", Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 9(1-2), pp.15~38 (1990)
- Penman, R., "Understanding Face-to-Face Interaction: Issues Linking Goals and Discourse", pp.21~42 (1991), Lawrence Erlbaum
- Pennbaker, J., "The Secret Life of Pronouns: What Our Words Say about Us" (2013), Bloomsbury Press
- Pennington, N., "A Cognitive Theory of Juror Decision Making: The Story Model", Cordoza Law Review, 13, pp.519~557 (1991)
- Reilly, J., "Acquiring Perspective in English: The Development of Stance", Journal of Pragmatics, 37(2), pp.185~208 (2005)
- Scheffer T, "Knowing How to Sleepwalk: Placing Expert Evidence in the Midst of an English Jury Trial", Science, Technology, & Human Values, 35(5), pp.620~644 (2010)
- Schiffrin, D., "Discourse and Identity", pp.103~132 (2006), Cambridge University Press
- Sierwierska, A., "Person" (2004), Cambridge University Press
- Silverstein, M., "Semiotic Mediation: Sociocultural and Psychological Perspectives", pp.219~259 (1985), Academic Press
- Skillicorn, D., "Annals of Information Systems", pp.25~39 (2010), Springer
- Skillicorn, D., "Extending Textual Models of Deception to Interrogation Settings", Linguistic Evidence in Security, Law and Intelligence, 1(1), pp.13~40 (2013)
- Spiecker, S., "The Influence of Opening Statement", Closing Argument Organizational Strategy on Juror Verdict and Damage Awards, 2003, pp.27(4), 437~456
- Stygall, G., "Trial Language: Differential Discourse Processing and Discursive Formation" (1994), John Benjamins
- Trenholm, S., "Persuasion and Social Influence" (1989), Prentice Hall
- van Hell, J. G., "To Take a Stance: A Development Study on the Use of Pronouns and Passives in Spoken and Written Texts in Different Genres", ournal of Pragmatics, 32(2), pp.239~273 (2005)
- Wales, K, "Generic “Your” and Jacobean Drama: The Rise and Fall of a Pronominal Usage", English Studies, 66(1), pp.7~24 (1985)
- Wales, K., "Personal pronouns in Present-day English" (1996), Cambridge University Press
- Walker, T., "Thou and You in Early Modern English Dialogues: Trials, Depositions, and Drama Comedy" (2007), John Benjamins
- Zupnik, Y, "A Pragmatic Analysis of the Use of Person Deixis in Political Discourse", Journal of Pragmatics, 21, pp.339~384 (1994)
