Similarities and Differences between the Close and Loose Apposition in English
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
English introduces two different types of nominal apposition: close and loose apposition. These two types of apposition share many grammatical properties, but at the same time behave differently in many respects. The loose apposition construction is a head-modifier structure in which the appositive, functioning as a modifier, also evokes an independent message linked to the conversational implicature. Meanwhile, the close apposition construction is a modifier-head structure in which the head is a proper noun requiring a definite specifier. This paper shows that the grammatical similarities and differences between these two can be followed from a Construction Grammar view.
Abstract
English introduces two different types of nominal apposition: close and loose apposition. These two types of apposition share many grammatical properties, but at the same time behave differently in many respects. The loose apposition construction is a head-modifier structure in which the appositive, functioning as a modifier, also evokes an independent message linked to the conversational implicature. Meanwhile, the close apposition construction is a modifier-head structure in which the head is a proper noun requiring a definite specifier. This paper shows that the grammatical similarities and differences between these two can be followed from a Construction Grammar view.
참고문헌 (19)
- Acuña-Farifña, Juan, "On apposition", English language and linguistics, 3(1), pp.59~81 (1999)
- Acuña-Farifña, Juan, "Aspects of the grammar of close apposition and the structure of the noun phrase", English language and linguistics, 13(3), pp.453~481 (2009)
- Burton-Roberts, N., "Nominal apposition", Foundations of Language, 13, pp.391~319 (1975)
- Delorme, Evelyne, "Appositive NP Constructions: We, the Men: We Men: I, a Man: Etc", Foundations of Language, 8(1), pp.2~29 (1972)
- Doron, Edit., "Proceedings of the ninth annual conference of the Israel Association for Theoretical Linguistics and of the workshop on discourse", pp.53~65 (1998), Hebrew University
- Goldberg, Adele, "Constructions at Work: Constructionist Approaches in Context" (2006), Oxford University Press
- Hannay, Mike, "English non-restrictive appositions in FDG", pp.159~194 (2005), Studies in Functional Grammar
- Heringa, Herman, "Appositional constructions", 박사, pp.2011
- Huddleston, Rodney, "The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language" (2002), Cambridge University Press
- Jackendoff, Ray, "On the phrase the phrase `the phrase'", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 2, pp.25~37 (1984)
- Keizer, Evelien, "The discourse function of close appositions", Neophilologus, 89, pp.447~467 (2005)
- 김종복, "Form and Function Mismatch in the English Appositional Construction", 어학연구, 48(3), pp.509~531 (2012), 언어교육원
- Lasersohn, Peter., "The semantics of appositive and pseudo-appositive NP's", Proceedings of the Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, 3, pp.311~322 (1986)
- 이남근, "영어 폐쇄적 동격구문의 통사구조", 언어학, 22(1), pp.151~167 (2014), 대한언어학회
- Mikkelsen, Line, "Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning", pp.1805~1829 (2011), Mouton de Gruyter
- Potts, Chris., "The Logic of Conventional Implicatures" (2005), Oxford University Press
- Potts, Chris., "The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces", pp.475~501 (2007), Oxford University Press
- Quirk, Randolph, "A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language" (1985), Longman
- Sag, Ivan A., "Sign-Based Construction Grammar" (2012), CSLI Publications