본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Remarks on Pleonasm in Old English Suffixation

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

In some of Old English complex words combined with one or two suffixes, there is found the relationship of synonymy between lexical elements, specifically between a base and a derivative, or between two co-occurring suffixes (e.g., æðel ‘noble’ vs. æðellic ‘noble’; god ‘god’ vs. godcund ‘divine’, godlic ‘divine’ vs. godcundlic ‘divine’). A suffix in such derivatives seems to be semantically-vacuous and morphologically-redundant; therefore, the attachment of the suffix gives rise to violations of morphological constraints against semantically vacuous operation (e.g., the Elsewhere Condition). This paper investigates OE derivatives displaying the synonymous relationship between their constituents, and discusses different types of suffix pleonasm. The results of this study reveal that most suffixes involving pleonasm are also used as free words in OE, standing on a transitional stage of historical development. Due to their dual membership, the suffixes appear to be semantically obscure when they occur to some base words. I argue that suffix pleonasm is a process occurring to improve morphological or semantic transparency of the derivatives.

Abstract

In some of Old English complex words combined with one or two suffixes, there is found the relationship of synonymy between lexical elements, specifically between a base and a derivative, or between two co-occurring suffixes (e.g., æðel ‘noble’ vs. æðellic ‘noble’; god ‘god’ vs. godcund ‘divine’, godlic ‘divine’ vs. godcundlic ‘divine’). A suffix in such derivatives seems to be semantically-vacuous and morphologically-redundant; therefore, the attachment of the suffix gives rise to violations of morphological constraints against semantically vacuous operation (e.g., the Elsewhere Condition). This paper investigates OE derivatives displaying the synonymous relationship between their constituents, and discusses different types of suffix pleonasm. The results of this study reveal that most suffixes involving pleonasm are also used as free words in OE, standing on a transitional stage of historical development. Due to their dual membership, the suffixes appear to be semantically obscure when they occur to some base words. I argue that suffix pleonasm is a process occurring to improve morphological or semantic transparency of the derivatives.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. Anderson, Stephen R, "Disjunctive ordering in inflectional morphology", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 4, pp.1~31 (1986)
  2. Aronoff, Mark, "Restricting suffix combination in German and English: Closing suffixes and the monosuffix constraint", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 20, pp.451~490 (2002)
  3. "Online Anglo-Saxon Dictionary" (2010)[URL]
  4. Covington, Michael A., "Evidence for lexicalism. A Critical Review" (1981), University Linguistics Club
  5. Cruse, Alan, "Meaning in Language: An introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics" (2004), Oxford University Press
  6. Dressler, Wolfgang U., "Analecta homini universali dicata. Arbeiten zur Indogermanistik, Linguistik, Philologie. Politik, Musik und Dichtung. Festschrift für Oswald Panagl zum 65. Geburtstag", pp.515~524 (2004), Heinz
  7. Frazer, Bruce, "Motor oil is motor oil. An account of English nominal tautologies", Journal of Pragmatics, 12, pp.215~220 (1988)
  8. Gardani, Francesco., "Word-formation: An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe. Volume 1", pp.537~550 (2015), De Gruyter Mouton
  9. Haspelmath, Martin, "The diachronic externalization of inflection", Linguistics, 31(2), pp.279~309 (1993)
  10. 김유강, "A Corpus-based Analysis of Old English -lic and -lice", 영어학연구, (25), pp.127~148 (2008), 한국영어학학회[DOI]
  11. 김유강, "Semantic Conditions on Prefix Order in Old English", 영어학연구, 19(2), pp.57~85 (2013), 한국영어학학회[DOI]
  12. 김유강, "고대영어 접미사와 독립어의 경계구분에 대한 연구", 영어학연구, 23(2), pp.1~39 (2017), 한국영어학학회[DOI]
  13. Kiparsky, Paul, "Linguistics in the Morning Calm", pp.3~91 (1982), Hanshin
  14. Lehmann, Christian, "Yearbook of Morphology 2005", pp.119~154 (2005), Springer
  15. Lieber, Rochelle, "Morphology and Lexical Semantics" (2004), Cambridge University Press
  16. Malkiel. Yakov, "Diachronic hypercharacterization in Romance", Archivum Linguisticum, 9(1), pp.79~113 (1957)
  17. Marchand, Hans, "The Categories and Types of Present-day English Word Formation" (1969), Beck
  18. Martín Arista, Javier, "Adjective formation and lexical layers in Old English", English Studies, 92(3), pp.323~344 (2011)
  19. McIntosh, Angus, "Old English adjectives with –lic derivative patterns: Some semantic problems", Neuphilologische Mitteilungen, 92, pp.297~310 (1991)
  20. Ortmann, Albert, "Affix repetition and non-redundancy in inflectional morphology", Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 18(1), pp.76~120 (1999)
  21. Plag, Ingo, "Word-formation in English" (2003), Cambridge University Press
  22. Plank. Frans, "Morphologische (Ir-)Regularitäten. Aspekte der Wortstrukturtheorie" (1981), Narr
  23. Plank, Frans, "On the reapplication of morphological rules after phonological rules and other resolutions of functional conflicts between morphology and phonology", Linguistics, 23, pp.45~82 (1985)
  24. Szymanek, Bogdan, "Semantics of Complex words, Studies in Morphology 3", pp.143~161 (2015), Springer
  25. Thomason, Sarah., "Double marking in morphological change", ESCOL 87. Proceedings of the Fourth Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, pp.296~305 (1988), Ohio State University

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)