다중 난이도를 갖는 시각적 Oddball 작업 수행 시 사상관련전위의 독립요소분석
Independent Component Analysis of the Event-Related Potential during Visual Oddball Tasks with Multiple Difficulty Levels
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to observe the brain activity patterns during visual oddball tasks with two difficulty levels by the analysis of high-density event-related potential (ERP). Along with conventional statistical analysis of averaged ERP waveforms, we applied independent component analysis (ICA) for the individual, single-trial analysis and verified its effectiveness. We could identify multiple ERP components such as early visual components (P1, N1), and two components which seem to be important task-related components and showed difficulty-dependent variability (P2, P300). The P2 was found around central region at 180 ~ 220 ms, and the P300 was found globally at 300 ~ 500 ms poststimulus. As the task became difficult, the P2 amplitude increased, and the P300 amplitude decreased. After single-trial ERPs were decomposed into multiple independent components (ICs), several ICs resulting from P2 and P300 sources were identified. These ICs were projected onto scalp electrodes and the projected ICs were statistically compared according to two task difficulties. For most subjects, the results obtained from single-trial/individual analysis using ICA gave the tendencies of amplitude change that are similar to the averaged ERP analysis for most subjects. The temporal pattern and number of ICs corresponding to rhythm was not dependent on the task difficulty. It seems that the motor response was not affected by the task difficulty.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to observe the brain activity patterns during visual oddball tasks with two difficulty levels by the analysis of high-density event-related potential (ERP). Along with conventional statistical analysis of averaged ERP waveforms, we applied independent component analysis (ICA) for the individual, single-trial analysis and verified its effectiveness. We could identify multiple ERP components such as early visual components (P1, N1), and two components which seem to be important task-related components and showed difficulty-dependent variability (P2, P300). The P2 was found around central region at 180 ~ 220 ms, and the P300 was found globally at 300 ~ 500 ms poststimulus. As the task became difficult, the P2 amplitude increased, and the P300 amplitude decreased. After single-trial ERPs were decomposed into multiple independent components (ICs), several ICs resulting from P2 and P300 sources were identified. These ICs were projected onto scalp electrodes and the projected ICs were statistically compared according to two task difficulties. For most subjects, the results obtained from single-trial/individual analysis using ICA gave the tendencies of amplitude change that are similar to the averaged ERP analysis for most subjects. The temporal pattern and number of ICs corresponding to rhythm was not dependent on the task difficulty. It seems that the motor response was not affected by the task difficulty.
참고문헌 (18)
- J. Polich, "Neuroph- ysiology of P3a and P3b: A theoretical overview", pp.15~32 (2004), Kjellberg Press
- J. Polich, "Alzheimer’s disease and P300: Review and evaluation of task and modality", Alzheimer. Res, 2(3), pp.515~525 (2005)
- J. Polich, "Clinical application of the P300 event-related brain potential", Phys. Med. Rehabil. Clin. N. Am, 15(1), pp.133~161 (2004)
- J. Polich, "P300 topography of amplitude", latency correlations, 1997, pp.9(4), 275~282
- A.Kok, "On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity", Psychophysiology, 38(3), pp.557~577 (2001)
- R. Sawaki, "Difficulty of discrimination modulates attentional capture for deviant information", Psychophysiology, 44(3), pp.374~382 (2007)
- G.F. Hagen, "P3a from visual stimuli: Task difficulty effects", Int. J. Psychop- hysiol, 59(1), pp.8~14 (2006)
- J. Polich, "P3a from visual stimuli: typicality, task, and topography", Brain Topogr, 15(3), pp.141~152 (2003)
- J. Polich, "Alzheimer’s disease and P300: evaluation of modality and task difficulty", Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. Suppl, pp.527~536 (1998)
- T-P. Jung, "Analysis and visualization of single-trial Event-related potentials", Hum. Brain Mapp, 14(3), pp.166~185 (2001)
- T.-P. Jung, "Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation", Psychophysiology, 37(2), pp.163~178 (2000)
- S. Debener, "What is novel in the novelty oddball paradigm? Functional significance of the novelty P3 event-related potential as revealed by independent component analysis", Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res, 22(3), pp.309~321 (2005)
- S. Makeig, "Blind separation of auditory event-related brain responses into independent components", Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94(20), pp.10979~10984 (1997)
- T.-W. Lee, "A unifying information-theoretic framework for independent component analysis", Comput. Math. Appl, 39(11), pp.1~21 (2000)
- V. Jurcak, "10", 20, 10, 5 systems revisited: Their validity as relative head-surface-based positi- oning systems, pp.NeuroImage, 2007[DOI]
- T.-W. Picton, "Guidelines for using human event-related poten- tials to study cognition: Recording standards and publication criteria", Psychophysiology, 37(2), pp.127~152 (2000)
- F.P. Geoffrey, "An ERP index of task relevance evaluation of visual stimuli", Brain Cogn, 56(1), pp.5~13 (2004)
- J.A. Pineda, "The functional significance of µ rhythms: Translating “seeing” and “hearing” into “doing”", Brain. Res. Brain Res. Rev, 50(3), pp.57~68 (2005)