본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

이중 주파수 tACS를 이용한 안정상태 시각 유발 전위 반응 향상

Enhancing Multiple Steady-State Visual Evoked Potential Responses Using Dual-frequency tACS

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Steady-state visual evoked potential-based brain-computer interface (SSVEP-BCI) is one of the promising sys- tems that can serve as an alternative input device due to its stable and fast performance. However, one of the major bot- tlenecks is that some individuals exhibit no or very low SSVEP responses to flickering stimulation, known as SSVEP illit- eracy, resulting in low performance on SSVEP-BCIs. However, a lengthy duration is required to enhance multiple SSVEP responses using traditional single-frequency transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). This research proposes a novel approach using dual-frequency tACS (df-tACS) to potentially enhance SSVEP by targeting the two frequencies with the lowest signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for each participant. Seven participants (five males, average age: 24.42) were exposed to flickering checkerboard stimuli at six frequencies to determine the weakest SNR frequencies. These frequen- cies were then simultaneously stimulated using df-tACS for 20 minutes, and the experiment was repeated to evaluate changes in SSVEP responses. The results showed that df-tACS effectively enhances the SNR at each targeted frequency, suggesting it can selectively improve target frequency responses. The study supports df-tACS as a more efficient solution for SSVEP illiteracy, proposing further exploration into multi-frequency tACS that could stimulate more than two frequen- cies, thereby expanding the potential of SSVEP-BCIs.

Abstract

Steady-state visual evoked potential-based brain-computer interface (SSVEP-BCI) is one of the promising sys- tems that can serve as an alternative input device due to its stable and fast performance. However, one of the major bot- tlenecks is that some individuals exhibit no or very low SSVEP responses to flickering stimulation, known as SSVEP illit- eracy, resulting in low performance on SSVEP-BCIs. However, a lengthy duration is required to enhance multiple SSVEP responses using traditional single-frequency transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). This research proposes a novel approach using dual-frequency tACS (df-tACS) to potentially enhance SSVEP by targeting the two frequencies with the lowest signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for each participant. Seven participants (five males, average age: 24.42) were exposed to flickering checkerboard stimuli at six frequencies to determine the weakest SNR frequencies. These frequen- cies were then simultaneously stimulated using df-tACS for 20 minutes, and the experiment was repeated to evaluate changes in SSVEP responses. The results showed that df-tACS effectively enhances the SNR at each targeted frequency, suggesting it can selectively improve target frequency responses. The study supports df-tACS as a more efficient solution for SSVEP illiteracy, proposing further exploration into multi-frequency tACS that could stimulate more than two frequen- cies, thereby expanding the potential of SSVEP-BCIs.

참고문헌 (39)

  1. Wolpaw JR, "Brain–computer interfaces for communication and control", Clin Neurophysiol, 113(6), pp.767~791 (2002)
  2. Im CH, "Introduction to EEG-Based Brain-Computer Interface(BCI)Technology", J Biomed Eng Res, 31(1), pp.1~13 (2010)
  3. Collinger JL, "High-performance neuroprosthetic control by an individual with tetraplegia", The Lancet, 381(9866), pp.557~564 (2013)
  4. Nijboer F, "A P300-based brain–computer interface for people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis", Clin Neurophysiol, 119(8), pp.1909~1916 (2008)
  5. Hwang H-J, "EEG-based brain-computer interfaces: a thorough literature survey", Int J Hum Comput, 29(12), pp.814~826 (2013)
  6. Ramadan RA, "Brain computer interface: control signals review", Neurocomputing, 223, pp.26~44 (2017)
  7. Nijboer F, "An auditory brain–computer interface(BCI)", J Neurosci Methods, 167(1), pp.43~50 (2008)
  8. Kim D-W, "Auditory brain-computer interfaces(BCIs)and their practical applications", Biomed Eng Lett, 2, pp.13~17 (2012)
  9. Brouwer A-M, "A tactile P300 brain-computer interface", Front Neurol, 4, pp.1440~ (2010)
  10. Herweg A, "Wheelchair control by elderly participants in a virtual environment with a brain-computer interface(BCI)and tactile stimulation", Biol Psychol, 121, pp.117~124 (2016)
  11. Diez PF, "Asynchronous BCI control using high-frequency SSVEP", J Neuroeng Rehabil, 8, pp.1~9 (2011)
  12. Müller-Putz GR, "Steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP)-based communication:impact of harmonic frequency components", J Neural Eng, 2(4), pp.123~130 (2005)
  13. Wu Z, "Stimulator selection in SSVEP-based BCI", Med Eng Phys, 30(8), pp.1079~1088 (2008)
  14. Norcia AM, "The steady-state visual evoked potential in vision research:A review", J Vis, 15(6), pp.1~46 (2015)
  15. Vialatte F-B, "Steady-state visually evoked potentials: focus on essential paradigms and future perspectives", Prog Neurobiol, 90(4), pp.418~438 (2010)
  16. Edlinger G, "Clinical Systems Neuroscience", pp.33~66 (2015), Springer
  17. Allison BZ, "Brain-computer interfaces: Applying our Minds to Human-Computer Interaction", pp.35~54 (2010), Springer
  18. Volosyak I, "BCI demographics II: How many (and what kinds of) people can use a high-frequency SSVEP BCI?", IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehab Eng, 19(3), pp.232~239 (2011)
  19. Gembler F, "Autonomous parameter adjustment for SSVEP-based BCIs with a novel BCI wizard", Front Neurosci, 9, pp.155623~ (2015)
  20. Wang M, "A new hybrid BCI paradigm based on P300 and SSVEP", J Neurosci Methods, 244, pp.16~25 (2015)
  21. Zhang S, "Transcranial direct current stimulation-based neuromodulation improves the performance of brain–computer interfaces based on steady-state visual evoked potential", IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehab Eng, 31, pp.1364~1373 (2023)
  22. Reed T, "Transcranial electrical stimulation(tES)mechanisms and its effects on cortical excitability and connectivity", J Inherited Metab Dis, 41, pp.1123~1130 (2018)
  23. Fertonani A, "Transcranial electrical stimulation:what we know and do not know about mechanisms", Neuroscientist, 23(2), pp.109~123 (2017)
  24. Yavari F, "Basic and functional effects of transcranial Electrical Stimulation(tES)—An introduction", Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 85, pp.81~92 (2018)
  25. Liu B, "tACS facilitates flickering driving by boosting steady-state visual evoked potentials", J Neural Eng, 18(6), pp.066042~ (2021)
  26. Kasten FH, "Sustained aftereffect of α-tACS lasts up to 70 min after stimulation", Front Hum Neurosci, 10, pp.245~ (2016)
  27. Neuling T, "Finite-element model predicts current density distribution for clinical applications of tDCS and tACS", Front Psychiatry, 3, pp.25619~ (2012)
  28. Antal A, "Excitability changes induced in the human primary visual cortex by transcranial direct current stimulation: direct electrophysiological evidence", Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 45(2), pp.702~707 (2004)
  29. Lin J, "Cross-target transfer algorithm based on the volterra model of SSVEPBCI", Tsinghua Sci Technol, 26(4), pp.505~522 (2021)
  30. Chen X, "A spectrally-dense encoding method for designing a high-speed SSVEP-BCI with 120stimuli", IEEE T Neur Sys Reh, 30, pp.2764~2772 (2022)
  31. Na R, "An embedded lightweight SSVEP-BCI electric wheelchair with hybrid stimulator", Digit Signal Process, 116, pp.103101~ (2021)
  32. Kim D-W, "Can anodal transcranial direct current stimulation increase steady-state visual evoked potential responses?", J Korean Med Sci, 34(43), pp.e285~ (2019)
  33. Neuling T, "Orchestrating neuronal networks: sustained after-effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation depend upon brain states", Front Hum Neurosci, 7, pp.161~ (2013)
  34. Vosskuhl J, "Increase in short-term memory capacity induced by down-regulating individual theta frequency via transcranial alternating current stimulation", Front Hum Neurosci, 9, pp.257~ (2015)
  35. Cao T, "Objective evaluation of fatigue by EEG spectral analysis in steady-state visual evoked potential-based brain-computer interfaces", Biomed Eng Online, 13, pp.1~13 (2014)
  36. Toffanin P, "Using frequency tagging to quantify attentional deployment in a visual divided attention task", Int J Psychophysiol, 72(3), pp.289~298 (2009)
  37. Joon Kim Y, "Attention induces synchronization-based response gain in steady-state visual evoked potentials", Nat Neurosci, 10(1), pp.117~125 (2007)
  38. Zanto TP, "Individual differences in neuroanatomy and neurophysiology predict effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation", Brain Stimul, 14(5), pp.1317~1329 (2021)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)