본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

탈냉전시대 한중일 3국의 미래전략과 역사논쟁

Future Strategies and History Argument of South Korea, China, and Japan in the post Cold War era

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

Despite the global post Cold War impact since the 1990s, the situation in Northeast Asia is unstable and seems recurrent of the past. The reason why Northeast Asia is still trapped in this conflict is because the balance of power has been destroyed. Under this situation, the Japanese right wing is again trying to seize hegemony in Northeast Asia. They stand in opposition to China as the US has done, and furthermore they are aiming at both military and economic hegemony in Northeast Asia. China is also working toward this seizure of Northeast Asian hegemony. The Japanese right wing has taken the strategy of expanding the scope of history argument with Korea to the whole Northeast Asian region. Under the situation in which the Cold War order has been destroyed, the “problem of history” narrative is utilized as an excellent tool to unite the Japanese citizens. It is because the Japanese have to put an end to the “problem of history” regarding its colonization and participation in the Pacific War. China is also using its position as the G2 country. They emphasize patriotism and Sinocentrism within China while outcrying Northeast Asian peace to the world, but they never think of giving up their hegemony to the United States or Japan. The nationalist conflict such as problems of history and territory within the Northeast Asian region has become worse. However, fortunately for the region, the civil societies of the three countries, South Korea, China, and Japan, are becoming closer. Also, there has been active communication and discussion of history at a nongovernmental level with a goal of finding out the real truth of the past. There is still hope of overcoming the nationalism and hegemonism that tries to bring us back to the Cold War conflict with an evil cause of “problem of history.”

Abstract

Despite the global post Cold War impact since the 1990s, the situation in Northeast Asia is unstable and seems recurrent of the past. The reason why Northeast Asia is still trapped in this conflict is because the balance of power has been destroyed. Under this situation, the Japanese right wing is again trying to seize hegemony in Northeast Asia. They stand in opposition to China as the US has done, and furthermore they are aiming at both military and economic hegemony in Northeast Asia. China is also working toward this seizure of Northeast Asian hegemony. The Japanese right wing has taken the strategy of expanding the scope of history argument with Korea to the whole Northeast Asian region. Under the situation in which the Cold War order has been destroyed, the “problem of history” narrative is utilized as an excellent tool to unite the Japanese citizens. It is because the Japanese have to put an end to the “problem of history” regarding its colonization and participation in the Pacific War. China is also using its position as the G2 country. They emphasize patriotism and Sinocentrism within China while outcrying Northeast Asian peace to the world, but they never think of giving up their hegemony to the United States or Japan. The nationalist conflict such as problems of history and territory within the Northeast Asian region has become worse. However, fortunately for the region, the civil societies of the three countries, South Korea, China, and Japan, are becoming closer. Also, there has been active communication and discussion of history at a nongovernmental level with a goal of finding out the real truth of the past. There is still hope of overcoming the nationalism and hegemonism that tries to bring us back to the Cold War conflict with an evil cause of “problem of history.”

참고문헌 (19)

  1. "「헌법재판소 결정요지", 사건번호: 2006헌마788, ‘대한민국과 일본국 간의재산 및 청구권에 관한 문제의 해결과 경제협력에 관한 협정 제3조 부작위 위헌확인’」 2011년 8월 30일, ~ (2011)
  2. "「세계일보」, 「연합뉴스」, 「産經新聞」 외 각종 언론", ~
  3. "最新 日本史" (2003), 명성사
  4. 노무현, "최근 한ㆍ일 관계와 관련하여 국민 여러분에게 드리는 글", ~ (2005)
  5. 노무현, "한일 관계에 대한 대통령 특별담화문: 독도는 역사입니다", ~ (2006)
  6. 다카사키 소우지, "검증 한일회담" (1998), 청수서원
  7. 다카하시 데쓰야, "역사인식 논쟁" (2002), 作品社
  8. 동북아역사재단, "중국의 동북공정의 경과와 쟁점 및 한국의 대응", ~ (2007)
  9. 서승, "일본의 우경화와 한․일군사동맹의 위험성", 역사비평, (겨울) (1999)
  10. 아시아평화와역사교육연대, , 2005년도 일본문부과학성 검정통과 후소샤ㆍ동경ㆍ일본 교과서 분석 심포지엄 (2005)
  11. 安倍晋三, "美しい國,へ" (2006), 文藝春秋
  12. 安倍晋三ㆍ岡崎久彦, "この國を守る決意" (2006), 扶桑社
  13. 윤지훈, "「북중 경협의 상징 압록강ㆍ두만강 개발프로젝트 황금평과 라진항, 동북아 경제지도 바꾼다", 민족21, (104) (2009)
  14. 윤휘탁, "신중화주의--'중화민족 대가정 만들기'와 한반도" (2006), 푸른역사
  15. 이신철, "한·일 근현대 역사논쟁" (2007), 선인
  16. 전재성, "한국의 동아시아 미래전략" (2008), 삼영사
  17. 차상철, "한미동맹 50년" (2004), 생각의 나무
  18. 1, "敎科書 攻擊の 深層" (1997), 學習の友社
  19. 타와라 요시후미, "철저검증위험한 교과서" (2001), 역사넷

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)