본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

17~18세기 통어영의 설치와 운영

The Installation and Operation of Tongeoyeong in the 17th and 18th Century

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

After the Japanese Invasion of Korea in 1592, the naval forces in Joseon organized a defense system with two axes: Tongeoyong and Tongjeyong. In previous studies, this was referred to as either ‘Yangyeong’ or ‘Tongyeong’ system. To mention the naval forces defense system in late Joseon like that, however, it is essential to investigate the two camps both. Yet, research has been focused on Tongjeong mostly so far. Here, this study aims to look into the status of Tongeoyeong more than Tongjeoyong by examining the internal structure of Tongeoyong and its method of acquiring finances. This study has found that Tongeoyeong had fewer workers and smaller finances than Tongjeoyeong. The warships that could be mobilized were fewer than half of those belonging to Tongjeyeong. Although they were both the supreme institutions of the naval forces in Joseon managing the naval forces of three provinces, difference is found in the sizes of the two military camps like what is written above. This is attributed to the combined reflection of the types and characteristics of enemies and geographical locations, etc.

Abstract

After the Japanese Invasion of Korea in 1592, the naval forces in Joseon organized a defense system with two axes: Tongeoyong and Tongjeyong. In previous studies, this was referred to as either ‘Yangyeong’ or ‘Tongyeong’ system. To mention the naval forces defense system in late Joseon like that, however, it is essential to investigate the two camps both. Yet, research has been focused on Tongjeong mostly so far. Here, this study aims to look into the status of Tongeoyeong more than Tongjeoyong by examining the internal structure of Tongeoyong and its method of acquiring finances. This study has found that Tongeoyeong had fewer workers and smaller finances than Tongjeoyeong. The warships that could be mobilized were fewer than half of those belonging to Tongjeyeong. Although they were both the supreme institutions of the naval forces in Joseon managing the naval forces of three provinces, difference is found in the sizes of the two military camps like what is written above. This is attributed to the combined reflection of the types and characteristics of enemies and geographical locations, etc.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. "조선왕조실록", ~
  2. "비변사등록", ~
  3. "승정원일기", ~
  4. "부역실총", ~
  5. "여지도서", ~
  6. "만기요람", ~
  7. 金鉉丘, "조선후기 통제영의 재정운영에 관한 연구 : 통영곡을 중심으로", 박사, 사학, pp.1994
  8. 송기중, "조선후기 수군 연구" (2018), 역사비평사
  9. 張學根, "朝鮮時代 海洋防衛史" (1987), 창미사
  10. 한명기, "임진왜란과 한중관계" (1999), 역사비평사
  11. 김우진, "숙종의 강화도 축성과 御眞의 奉安", 조선시대사학보, (90), pp.191~234 (2019), 조선시대사학회[DOI]
  12. 김일룡, "統制營 軍點水操 연구", 이순신연구논총, 29 (2018)
  13. 김현구, "19세기 후반 통제영 8전선 船團 실태 - 1894년 『통제영 解由文記』를 중심으로 -", 古文書硏究, 57, pp.85~123 (2020), 한국고문서학회[DOI]
  14. 朴廣成, "丙子亂後의 江華島 防備構築", 畿甸文化硏究, 3 (1973)
  15. 方相鉉, "朝鮮後期 水軍統制使 硏究 - 水軍統制營設置背景을 중심으로", 國史館論叢, 17 (1990)
  16. 배성수, "肅宗初 江華島 墩臺의 축조와 그 의의", 조선시대사학보, (27), pp.131~170 (2003), 조선시대사학회
  17. 송기중, "17세기 수군방어체제의 개편", 조선시대사학보, (53), pp.5~44 (2010), 조선시대사학회
  18. 송기중, "균역법 실시 이후 통영곡 운영의 변화", 한국문화, (66), pp.393~426 (2014), 규장각한국학연구원[DOI]
  19. 송기중, "17~18세기 통제영의 방어체제와 병력운영", 한국문화, (73), pp.273~310 (2016), 규장각한국학연구원[DOI]
  20. 송기중, "19세기 중엽 『통제영사례』로 본 통제영의 재정운영 실태", 역사와 현실, (116), pp.291~323 (2020), 한국역사연구회[DOI]
  21. 송양섭, "17세기 江華島 방어체제의 확립과 鎭撫營의 창설", 韓國史學報, (13), pp.10~ (2002), 고려사학회
  22. 송양섭, "총론 : 조선후기 재정사 연구와 『부역실총』", 역사와 현실, (70), pp.13~26 (2008), 한국역사연구회
  23. 이근호, "조선후기 수도방위체제" (1998), 서울학연구소
  24. 이민웅, "통제・통어 양영체제와 수군의 재정비", 조선후기 군사사, 8 (2012), 육군군사연구소
  25. 李敏雄, "18세기 江華島 守備體制의 强化", 韓國史論, 34 (1995)
  26. 李敏雄, "17~18세기 水操 運營의 一例 考察-규장각 소장본 경상좌수영 「水操笏記」를 중심으로-", 軍史, 38 (1999)
  27. 이홍두, "병자호란 전후 江都의 鎭堡설치와 관방체계의 확립", 인천학연구, 9 (2008)
  28. 장정수, "17세기 초 조선의 대(對)건주여진․후금 교섭과 조(朝)․명(明) 군사공조의 실상", 역사와 실학, (73), pp.123~158 (2020), 역사실학회

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)