The Persistence of the NCAV Stock Selection Criterion
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Net Current Asset Value (NCAV) rule continues to identify successfully firms that will provide superior risk-adjusted holding period returns after accounting for size, book-to-market (BM), risk, and prior performance. Relative to other firms, the NCAV firms (1) are more numerous during economic contractions, (2) are less likely to trade on the NYSE, (3) are less likely to be delisted because of liquidation, (4) are smaller firms, (5) have greater variance in holding period returns, (6) have higher BM ratios, and (7) have underperformed prior to their identification as NCAV opportunities. Overreaction serves as a partial explanation for the superior performance of NCAV firms.
Abstract
The Net Current Asset Value (NCAV) rule continues to identify successfully firms that will provide superior risk-adjusted holding period returns after accounting for size, book-to-market (BM), risk, and prior performance. Relative to other firms, the NCAV firms (1) are more numerous during economic contractions, (2) are less likely to trade on the NYSE, (3) are less likely to be delisted because of liquidation, (4) are smaller firms, (5) have greater variance in holding period returns, (6) have higher BM ratios, and (7) have underperformed prior to their identification as NCAV opportunities. Overreaction serves as a partial explanation for the superior performance of NCAV firms.
참고문헌 (29)
- Banz, R., "The relationship between return and market value of common stocks", Journal of Financial Economics, 9, pp.3~18 (1981)
- Beaver, W., "Delisting returns and their effect on accountingbased market anomalies", Journal of Accounting & Economics, 43, pp.341~368 (2007)
- Bildersee, J., "The performance of Japanese common stocks in relation to their net current asset values", Japan and the World Economy, 5, pp.197~215 (1993)
- Chan, K., "An unconditional asset-pricing test and the role of firm size as an instrumental variable for risk", Journal of Finance, 43, pp.309~425 (1988)
- Davis, J., "The cross-section of realized stock returns : The pre-COMPUSTAT evidence", Journal of Finance, 49, pp.1579~1593 (1994)
- DeBondt, W., "Does the stock market overreact?", Journal of Finance, 40, pp.793~805 (1985)
- DeBondt, W., "Further evidence on investor overreaction and stock market seasonality", Journal of Finance, 42, pp.793~805 (1987)
- Dimson, E., "Event study methodologies and the size effect : The case of U. K. press recommendations", Journal of Financial Economics, 17, pp.113~142 (1986)
- Fama, E., "The cross-section of expected stock returns", Journal of Finance, 47, pp.427~467 (1992)
- Fama, E., "Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds", Journal of Financial Economics, 33, pp.3~56 (1993)
- Fama, E., "Size and book-to-market factors in earnings and returns", Journal of Finance, 50, pp.131~155 (1995)
- Fama, E., "Multifactor explanations of asset pricing anomalies", Journal of Finance, 51, pp.55~84 (1996)
- Fama, E., "Value versus growth : The international evidence", Journal of Finance, 53, pp.1975~1999 (1998)
- Fama, E., "The value premium and the CAPM", Journal of Finance, 61, pp.2163~2185 (2006)
- Graham, B., "The Intelligent Investor" (1949), Harper & Row
- Graham, B., "The Intelligent Investor" (1973), Harper & Row
- Grinold, R., "Is beta dead again?", Financial Analysts Journal, 49, pp.28~34 (1993)
- He, J., "Economic forces, fundamental variables and equity returns", Journal of Business, 67, pp.599~639 (1994)
- Size-related covariation of stock returns, Working Paper, "Huberman, G.", University of Chicago, ~ (1985)
- Keim, D., "Size related anomalies and stock return seasonality : Further empirical evidence", Journal of Financial Economics, 12, pp.3~32 (1983)
- Lakonishok, J., "Systematic risk, total risk and size as determinants of stock market returns", Journal of Banking and Finance, 10, pp.115~132 (1986)
- Lauterbach, B., "Ben graham’s net current asset value rule revisited : The sizeadjusted returns", Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, 32, pp.82~108 (1993)
- Oppenheimer, H., "Ben graham's net current asset values : A performance update", Financial Analysts Journal, 42, pp.40~47 (1986)
- Reinganum, M., "A new empirical perspective on the CAPM", Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 16, pp.439~462 (1981)
- Reinganum, M., "Portfolio strategies based on market capitalization", Journal of Portfolio Management, 9, pp.29~36 (1983)
- Rosenberg, B., "Persuasive evidence of market inefficiency", Journal of Portfolio Management, 11, pp.9~17 (1985)
- Shumway, T., "The delisting bias in CRSP’s nasdaqdata and its implications for the size effect", Journal of Finance, 54, pp.2361~2379 (1999)
- Vu, J., "An empirical analysis of Ben Graham’s net current asset value rule", Financial Review, 23, pp.215~225 (1988)
- Xiao, Y., "Testing Benjamin Graham’s net current asset value strategy in London", The Journal of Investing, 17, pp.11~19 (2008)