본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

DOMESTIC VERSUS CROSS-BORDER ALLIANCES: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY OF RELATIONSHIP DIFFERENCES

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

International alliances predominate the literature (Terpstra and Simonin 1993), even though almost one-half ofstrategic alliancesformed by U.S. firms in the late 1980s involveddomestic partners (Cu/pan and Kostelac 1993). This study compares domestic and cross-border alliances in two areas: the structural framework (linkage, form, mode, coverage, and motive) and performance (perceived effectiveness) of the relationship. The findings indicate that though significant differences exist in the structural framework of domestic and cross-border alliances, these differences do not precipitate divergent levels o f relationship effectiveness. Alliances, regardless o f partner origin, appear effective at meeting the expectations created by such a cooperative venture.

Abstract

International alliances predominate the literature (Terpstra and Simonin 1993), even though almost one-half ofstrategic alliancesformed by U.S. firms in the late 1980s involveddomestic partners (Cu/pan and Kostelac 1993). This study compares domestic and cross-border alliances in two areas: the structural framework (linkage, form, mode, coverage, and motive) and performance (perceived effectiveness) of the relationship. The findings indicate that though significant differences exist in the structural framework of domestic and cross-border alliances, these differences do not precipitate divergent levels o f relationship effectiveness. Alliances, regardless o f partner origin, appear effective at meeting the expectations created by such a cooperative venture.

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)