1950, 60년대 중국 당대문학의 러시아ㆍ소련문학수용ㆍ전유와 그 변화 양상
Chinese literature in the 1950s and 1960s: Acceptance and Appropriation of Russian & Soviet Literature and Aspects of Changes
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Chinese literature in the 1950s and 1960s: Acceptance and Appropriation of Russian & Soviet Literature and Aspects of Changes Bark, Jeong-Hee Chinese contemporary literature in the 1950s and 1960s was closely related to and heavily influenced by Russian and Soviet literature. The socialist realism born in the Soviet Union was defined as the best methodology of Chinese literature in the 1950s and 1960s. This article serves as an preliminary work to a series of works that examine Soviet literary works and theories, which were regarded important to and effectively influential to Chinese literature at the time, the contact points between Russian & Soviet writers and Chinese writers and the aspect of changes in the relationship between the literature of two nations through Chinese translation of Soviet writing. In other words, it is a preliminary research to a series of study that investigates the birth of Chinese contemporary literature. The purpose of this article is to probe in detail the process of change that happened with Chinese contemporary literature in the 1950s and 1960s while accepting and appropriating Russian and Soviet literature. To this end, it considers the influence of the Soviet liberal arts textbooks on the establishment of Chinese liberal arts study system, Wang Meng’s A New Arrival at the Organization Department, which was created from the influence of Soviet literary works during the age of The Thaw, and the acceptance, appropriation, and re-appropriation of 19th century Russian literary theory. Eventually, it can be said that Chinese contemporary literature has built its literary assets through active selections and re-appropriations in accordance with the demands of the time under the absolute influence of Russian and Soviet literature. Adoption of Soviet norms and structures by Chinese contemporary literature was not just influenced by the Soviet literature but also resulted from the combination of peculiar cultural situations of China at the time.
Abstract
Chinese literature in the 1950s and 1960s: Acceptance and Appropriation of Russian & Soviet Literature and Aspects of Changes Bark, Jeong-Hee Chinese contemporary literature in the 1950s and 1960s was closely related to and heavily influenced by Russian and Soviet literature. The socialist realism born in the Soviet Union was defined as the best methodology of Chinese literature in the 1950s and 1960s. This article serves as an preliminary work to a series of works that examine Soviet literary works and theories, which were regarded important to and effectively influential to Chinese literature at the time, the contact points between Russian & Soviet writers and Chinese writers and the aspect of changes in the relationship between the literature of two nations through Chinese translation of Soviet writing. In other words, it is a preliminary research to a series of study that investigates the birth of Chinese contemporary literature. The purpose of this article is to probe in detail the process of change that happened with Chinese contemporary literature in the 1950s and 1960s while accepting and appropriating Russian and Soviet literature. To this end, it considers the influence of the Soviet liberal arts textbooks on the establishment of Chinese liberal arts study system, Wang Meng’s A New Arrival at the Organization Department, which was created from the influence of Soviet literary works during the age of The Thaw, and the acceptance, appropriation, and re-appropriation of 19th century Russian literary theory. Eventually, it can be said that Chinese contemporary literature has built its literary assets through active selections and re-appropriations in accordance with the demands of the time under the absolute influence of Russian and Soviet literature. Adoption of Soviet norms and structures by Chinese contemporary literature was not just influenced by the Soviet literature but also resulted from the combination of peculiar cultural situations of China at the time.
참고문헌 (36)
- 미하일 바흐친, "말의 힘", pp.361~ (2006), 길
- 毕达可夫, "文艺学引论", pp.12~528 (1958), 高等教育出版社
- 卞之琳, "十年来的外国文学翻译和研究工作", 文学评论, (5), pp.47~ (1959), 中国社会科学院文学研究所
- 陈玉刚主, "中国翻译文学史稿", pp.347~ (1989), 中国对外翻译出版公司
- 陈寅恪, "金明馆丛稿初编", pp.10~ (2001), 生活·读书·新知三联书店
- 樊星, "当代文学与多维文化", pp.111~ (2005), 武汉大学出版社
- 季摩菲耶夫, "文学原理 (第一部)", pp.1~13 (1954), 平明出版社
- 季摩菲耶夫, "文学原理", pp.1~3 (1955), 平明出版社
- 洪子诚, "相关性问题:当代文学与俄苏文学", 中国现代文学研究丛刊, (2), pp.60~72 (2016), 中国现代文学馆
- 洪子诚, "中国当代文学史", pp.23~142 (1999), 北京大学出版社
- 江青, "林彪同志委托江青同志召开的部队文艺工作者座谈会纪要", 绝缘材料, (4), pp.6~11 (1967)
- 李泽厚, "美学论集", pp.1~50 (1980), 上海文艺出版社
- 迈斯纳, "毛泽东的中国及后毛泽东的中国: 人民共和国史", pp.198~ (1989), 四川人民出版社
- 尼古拉耶娃, "拖拉机站站长和总农艺师", pp.130~ (1955), 中国青年出版社
- 彭龄, "重读≪拖拉机站站长和总农艺师≫", 中华读书报 (2015), 光明日报报业集团
- 青年团中央宣传部, "青年团中央宣传部关于推荐苏联中篇小说『拖拉机站站长和总农艺师』的通知", 中国青年, (23), pp.24~ (1955), 共青团中央
- 人民文学出版社编辑部, "苏联文学艺术问题", pp.38~66 (1953), 人民文学出版社
- 司徒伟智, "王蒙成名作与“娜斯嘉情结”", 档案春秋, (5), pp.48~49 (2010)
- 王若望, "向娜斯嘉学习", pp.7~ (1956), 上海人民出版社
- 王蒙, "关于≪组织部新来的青年人≫", 人民日报 (1957), 人民日报社
- 王蒙, "苏联文学的光明梦", 读书, (7), pp.58~60 (1993), 三联书店
- 王蒙, "王蒙文集 (第四卷)", pp.31~57 (1993), 华艺出版社
- 王蒙, "王蒙文存 (第21卷)", pp.19~20 (2003), 人民文学出版社
- 王元化, "关于当前文学研究中的两个问题——在中国文心雕龙学会第二次年会上的讲话", 安徽师范大学学报, (3), pp.1~5 (1986), 安徽师范大学
- 温儒敏, "当代文学思潮中的“ 别、车、杜现象”", 读书, (11), pp.36~38 (2003)
- 夏中义, "苏联理论模式与中国学术重建——以当代文艺学的学科命运为例", 学术月刊, (3), pp.13~ (2015), 上海市社会科学界联合会
- 夏中义, "反映论与毕达可夫≪文艺学引论≫——中国文艺学学科的方法论源流考辨", 学术月刊, (1), pp.115~125 (2015), 上海市社会科学界联合会
- 谢冕, "中国当代文学史料选 (1948-1975)", pp.636~ (1995), 北京大学出版社
- 杨福生, "王杨卢骆当时体——两种前苏联文艺学著述重读", 学术界, (90), pp.68~85 (2001), 安徽省社会科学界联合会
- 严家炎, "严家炎论小说", pp.196~ (2002), 江西高校出版社
- 以群, "文学的基本原理", pp.26~27 (1963), 作家出版社
- 袁洪权, "共和国文学中“组织”运作下的文学阅读—以『拖拉机站站长和总农艺师』为例", 海南师范大学学报(社会科学版), (1), pp.33~ (2014), 海南师范大学
- 庄桂成, "别、车、杜与中国20世纪文论", 理论月刊, (2), pp.134~ (2011)
- 周扬, "社会主义现实主义—中国文学前进的道路", 人民日报 (1953)
- 周扬, "周扬文集 (第1卷)", pp.141~ (1984), 人民文学出版社
- J. Kristeva, "Revolution in poetic Language", pp.66~67 (1984), Columbia Uni. Press
