The Impact of Industry 4.0 Adoption Barriers on Supply Chain Capacity and Operational Efficiency: Empirical Evidence in Vietnamese Transport Logistics Industry
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: This study evaluates the impact of Industry 4.0 adoption on supply chain capacity and operational performance under the mediating effect of barriers at Vietnamese transport logistics companies. Design/methodology/approach: Based on the perspective of Contingency theory and Resource-based theory, the research model is proposed and data is surveyed from 768 managers at Vietnamese transport logistics companies. Data were processed using SPSS and AMOS software. Findings: The results show that internal and external barriers have a negative impact on Industry 4.0 adoption, supply chain capacity, and operational performance. Applying Industry 4.0 also increases the operational efficiency and capacity of the supply chain. Research limitations/implications: The study proposes some implications to help businesses in the industry apply Industry 4.0 more successfully. However, the research is limited in the scope of data samples. Specifically, the data sample in the study mainly focuses on transport and logistics businesses in Vietnam, reducing the representativeness and generalizability of the results. In addition, limitations in assessment methods need to be improved. Although using a linear structural model, the study still has limitations in accurately assessing the relationship between variables. Originality/value: The research has important implications for managers in successfully applying Industry 4.0 to increase supply chain capabilities and achieve operational efficiency.
Abstract
Purpose: This study evaluates the impact of Industry 4.0 adoption on supply chain capacity and operational performance under the mediating effect of barriers at Vietnamese transport logistics companies. Design/methodology/approach: Based on the perspective of Contingency theory and Resource-based theory, the research model is proposed and data is surveyed from 768 managers at Vietnamese transport logistics companies. Data were processed using SPSS and AMOS software. Findings: The results show that internal and external barriers have a negative impact on Industry 4.0 adoption, supply chain capacity, and operational performance. Applying Industry 4.0 also increases the operational efficiency and capacity of the supply chain. Research limitations/implications: The study proposes some implications to help businesses in the industry apply Industry 4.0 more successfully. However, the research is limited in the scope of data samples. Specifically, the data sample in the study mainly focuses on transport and logistics businesses in Vietnam, reducing the representativeness and generalizability of the results. In addition, limitations in assessment methods need to be improved. Although using a linear structural model, the study still has limitations in accurately assessing the relationship between variables. Originality/value: The research has important implications for managers in successfully applying Industry 4.0 to increase supply chain capabilities and achieve operational efficiency.
참고문헌 (53)
- Bagchi, P. K., "Measuring the Supply Chain Competency of Nations : The Case of India", Supply Chain Forum : An International Journal, 2(1), pp.52~59 (2001)[DOI]
- Barney, J., "Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage", Journal of Management, 17(1), pp.99~120 (1991)
- Barney, J. B., "Resource-based theories of competitive advantage : A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view", Journal of Management, 27(6), pp.643~650 (2001)[DOI]
- Barreto, L., "Industry 4. 0implications in logistics : An overview", Procedia Manufacturing, 13, pp.1245~1252 (2017)[DOI]
- Bonilla, S. H., "Industry 4. 0 and sustainability implications : A scenario-based analysis of the impacts and challenges", Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(10) (2018)[DOI]
- Büchi, G., "Smart factory performance and Industry 4. 0", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 150, pp.119790~ (2020)[DOI]
- Chauhan, C., "Barriers to industry 4. 0 adoption and its performance implications : An empirical investigation of emerging economy", Journal of Cleaner Production, 285, pp.124809~ (2021)
- Cichosz, M., "Digital transformation at logistics service providers : barriers, success factors and leading practices", International Journal of Logistics Management, 31(2), pp.209~238 (2020)[DOI]
- Coates, T. T., "An exploratory analysis of new competencies : A resource based view perspective", Journal of Operations Management, 20(5), pp.435~450 (2002)[DOI]
- Donaldson, L., "Organization Design", pp.19~40 (2006), Springer
- Ellinger, A., "The influence of supply chain management competency on customer satisfaction and shareholder value", Supply Chain Management, 17(3), pp.249~262 (2012)[DOI]
- Flynn, B. B., "Relevance of Baldrige constructs in an international context : A study of national culture", Journal of Operations Management, 24(5), pp.583~603 (2006)[DOI]
- Frank, A. G., "Industry 4. 0 technologies : Implementation patterns in manufacturing companies", International Journal of Production Economics, 210, pp.15~26 (2019)[DOI]
- Gabdullina, L., "Transport and logistics innovations in supply chain management : Evidence from Kazakhstan", Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 8(2), pp.255~266 (2020)[DOI]
- Ganesan, V., "A study of IoT in SCM and its nodes in multimodal business process", Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(21) (2016)[DOI]
- Gellman, A. J., "Barriers to innovation in the railroad industry", Transportation Journal, 25(4), pp.4~11 (1986)
- Ghobakhloo, M., "The future of manufacturing industry : a strategic roadmap toward Industry 4. 0", Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 29(6), pp.910~936 (2018)[DOI]
- Green, K. W., "Total JIT(T-JIT)and its impact on supply chain competency and organizational performance", International Journal of Production Economics, 147(PART A), pp.125~135 (2014)[DOI]
- Hair, R., "When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM", European Business Review, 31(1), pp.2~24 (2019)[DOI]
- Huang, Z., "Industry 4. 0 : Development of a multi-agent system for dynamic value stream mapping in SMEs", Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 52, pp.1~12 (2019)[DOI]
- Ilin, V., "Logistics Industry 4.0: Challenges and Opportunities", 4th Logistics International Conference, pp.293~301 (2019)
- Jabbour, C. J. C., "Barriers to the adoption of green operational practices at Brazilian companies : Effects on green and operational performance", International Journal of Production Research, 54(10), pp.3042~3058 (2016)[DOI]
- Jang, K., "The Effect of Trust and Relationship Commitment on Supply Chain Performance through Integration and Collaboration", Global Business and Finance Review, 27(5), pp.129~148 (2022)[DOI]
- Karam, A., "Horizontal collaboration in the freight transport sector : barrier and decision-making frameworks", European Transport Research Review, 13(1), pp.1~22 (2021)[DOI]
- Kiel, D., "Sustainable industrial value creation : Benefits and challenges of industry 4. 0", International Journal of Innovation Management, 21(8) (2017)[DOI]
- Kim, Y. J., "A Short Essay on the Literature Review of the Service Supply Chain", Global Business and Finance Review, 28(2), pp.34~44 (2023)[DOI]
- Kouvelis, P., "Supply chain capacity and outsourcing decisions : the dynamic interplay of demand and supply uncertainty", IIE Transactions, 34(8), pp.717~728 (2002)[DOI]
- Kumar, R., "Application of industry 4. 0 technologies in SMEs for ethical and sustainable operations : Analysis of challenges", Journal of Cleaner Production, 275, pp.124063~ (2020)
- Lai, K. H., "Supply chain performance in transport logistics : An assessment by service providers", International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 6(3), pp.151~164 (2003)[DOI]
- Lai, K. H., "An empirical study of supply chain performance in transport logistics", International Journal of Production Economics, 87(3), pp.321~331 (2004)[DOI]
- Makkonen, H., "Dynamic capabilities and firm performance in a financial crisis", Journal of Business Research, 67(1), pp.2707~2719 (2014)[DOI]
- Moeuf, A., "The industrial management of SMEs in the era of Industry 4. 0", International Journal of Production Research, 56(3), pp.1118~1136 (2018)
- Nguyen, C. D. T., "The impact of logistics and infrastructure on economic growth: Empirical evidence from Vietnam", The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(6), pp.21~28 (2021)[DOI]
- Nguyen, H. P., "Sustainable development of logistics in vietnam in the period 2020-2025", International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 11(3), pp.665~682 (2020)
- Nunnally, J. C., "Psychometric Theory’ 25 Years Ago and Now", Educational Researcher, 4(10), pp.7~21 (1975)[DOI]
- Nwaiwu, F., "Industry 4. 0 concepts within the czech sme manufacturing sector : An empirical assessment of critical success factors", Business : Theory and Practice, 21(1), pp.58~70 (2020)[DOI]
- Omoluabi, E. T., "Contingency approach in Nigeria management system", Information and Knowledge Management, 6(7), pp.1~7 (2016)
- Ortt, J. R., "The evolution of innovation management towards contextual innovation", European Journal of Innovation Management, 11(4), pp.522~538 (2008)[DOI]
- Patrucco, A. S., "The role of absorptive capacity and big data analytics in strategic purchasing and supply chain management decisions", Technovation, 126, pp.102814~ (2023)[DOI]
- Porter, M. E., "How smart, connected products are transforming companies", Harvard Business Review, 93(10), pp.97~114 (2015)
- Post, J. E., "Managing the environmental change process : Barriers and opportunities", Managing Green Teams : Environmental Change in Organisations and Networks, 7(4), pp.84~101 (2017)
- Prasad, M. D., "Group Differences in Individual and Organizational Capabilities and Operational Performance in Implementing DX : Focusing on Nepalese SMEs", Global Business and Finance Review, 28(4), pp.20~33 (2023)[DOI]
- Prasad, M. D., "Integrating Digital Transformation and Servitization into Digital Servitization : A Case Study on Domino’s", Global Business and Finance Review, 27(5), pp.1~16 (2022)[DOI]
- Shaiful Fitri Abdul Rahman, N., "The adoption of industry 4. 0 practices by the logistics industry : A systematic review of the gulf region", Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain, 5, pp.100085~ (2022)[DOI]
- Sitorus, C., "Exploring the Influence of Digital Model Business Innovation Factors on the Courier Service Company’s Sustainability Innovation Performance", Global Business and Finance Review, 27(3), pp.98~113 (2022)[DOI]
- Somsuk, N., "A fuzzy AHP to prioritize enabling factors for strategic management of university business incubators : Resource-based view", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 85, pp.198~210 (2014)[DOI]
- Sousa, R., "Contingency research in operations management practices", Journal of Operations Management, 26(6), pp.697~713 (2008)[DOI]
- Sun, X., "The application of Industry 4. 0 technologies in sustainable logistics : A systematic literature review(2012-2020)to explore future research opportunities", Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(7), pp.9560~9591 (2022)[DOI]
- Torn, I. A. R., "Mass personalization with industry 4. 0 by SMEs : A concept for collaborative networks", Procedia Manufacturing, 28, pp.135~141 (2019)[DOI]
- Utami, H., "Resource-Based Theory. Resource-Based Theory. A Review", Water Act, 2016, pp.1~26 (2022)
- Walker, H., "Drivers and barriers to environmental supply chain management practices : Lessons from the public and private sectors", Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 14(1), pp.69~85 (2008)[DOI]
- Wisner, J. D., "a Structural Equation Model of Supply Chain Management Strategies and Firm Performance", Journal of Business Logistics, 24(1), pp.1~26 (2003)[DOI]
- Yalabik, B., "Customer, regulatory, and competitive pressure as drivers of environmental innovation", International Journal of Production Economics, 131(2), pp.519~527 (2011)[DOI]