본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

성인 동종 조혈모세포이식 환자에서 Busulfan 투여 횟수에 따른 효과 및 안전성 비교

Comparison of Therapeutic Effects and Safety of Once-daily versus Four-times-daily Intravenous Busulfan in Allogenic Transplantation

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Background : The conventional four-times-daily intravenous conditioning regimen of busulfan for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has shown limitations, such as low patient compliance, inconvenient preparation and administration, and stability. In this study, we compared the efficacy and safety between four-times-daily regimen of busulfan and once-a-day regimen of busulfan in adult patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT. Methods : We retrospectively analyzed the electronic medical records until September 2019 of patients who were administered busulfan once a day (ivBU1 group) and four times daily (ivBU4 group) between January 2016 to December 2016. Primary outcomes were 1-year survival, disease-free survival, relapse rate, non-relapse mortality, the incidence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and neutrophil and platelet recovery time. The secondary outcomes were cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and veno-occlusive disease (VOD) incidence. Results : Comparison of the ivBU1 group (n=75) and the ivBU4 group (n=59) showed that the 1-year survival rate was 75.1% vs 62.6% (p=0.127) and the 1-year disease free survival rate was 62.4% vs 56.2% (p=0.736), respectively. There was no significant difference in multivariate analysis of the relapse rate adjusted by HLA (human leukocyte antigen) match and the type of transplantation (p=0.129). In terms of the non-relapse mortality rate, the ivBU1 group showed a significantly lower rate in the multivariate analysis than the ivBU4 group (13.5% vs 29.8%, p=0.025). The incidence of GVHD was also lower in the ivBU1 group regardless of the patient characteristics (Odds Ratio= 0.333, 95%CI 0.130-0.851, p=0.022). There were no significant differences in neutrophil and platelet recovery, CMV infection, and VOD incidence. Conclusion : There were no significant differences in survival, disease-free survival, and relapse rate according to the number of busulfan administrations, and non-relapse mortality and GVHD incidence were lower in the ivBU1 group. Based on the results of this study, it is expected that the once-daily method can replace the four-times-daily method.

Abstract

Background : The conventional four-times-daily intravenous conditioning regimen of busulfan for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has shown limitations, such as low patient compliance, inconvenient preparation and administration, and stability. In this study, we compared the efficacy and safety between four-times-daily regimen of busulfan and once-a-day regimen of busulfan in adult patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT. Methods : We retrospectively analyzed the electronic medical records until September 2019 of patients who were administered busulfan once a day (ivBU1 group) and four times daily (ivBU4 group) between January 2016 to December 2016. Primary outcomes were 1-year survival, disease-free survival, relapse rate, non-relapse mortality, the incidence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and neutrophil and platelet recovery time. The secondary outcomes were cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and veno-occlusive disease (VOD) incidence. Results : Comparison of the ivBU1 group (n=75) and the ivBU4 group (n=59) showed that the 1-year survival rate was 75.1% vs 62.6% (p=0.127) and the 1-year disease free survival rate was 62.4% vs 56.2% (p=0.736), respectively. There was no significant difference in multivariate analysis of the relapse rate adjusted by HLA (human leukocyte antigen) match and the type of transplantation (p=0.129). In terms of the non-relapse mortality rate, the ivBU1 group showed a significantly lower rate in the multivariate analysis than the ivBU4 group (13.5% vs 29.8%, p=0.025). The incidence of GVHD was also lower in the ivBU1 group regardless of the patient characteristics (Odds Ratio= 0.333, 95%CI 0.130-0.851, p=0.022). There were no significant differences in neutrophil and platelet recovery, CMV infection, and VOD incidence. Conclusion : There were no significant differences in survival, disease-free survival, and relapse rate according to the number of busulfan administrations, and non-relapse mortality and GVHD incidence were lower in the ivBU1 group. Based on the results of this study, it is expected that the once-daily method can replace the four-times-daily method.

참고문헌 (17)

  1. Chhabra A, "Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in immunocompetent hosts without radiation or chemotherapy", Science translational medicine, 8(351), pp.351ra105~ (2016)
  2. Kim SW, "Busulfex (i.v. BU) and CY regimen before SCT: Japanese-targeted phase II pharmacokinetics combined study", Bone marrow transplantation, 43(8), pp.611~617 (2009)
  3. Kako S, "Safety and Efficacy of Once-Daily Intravenous Busulfan in Allogeneic Transplantation : A Matched-Pair Analysis", Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 24(10), pp.2139~2144 (2018)
  4. Santos GW, "Marrow transplantation for acute nonlymphocytic leukemia after treatment with busulfan and cyclophosphamide", The New England journal of medicine, 309(22), pp.1347~1353 (1983)
  5. Hassan M, "Busulfan bioavailability", Blood, 84(7), pp.2144~2150 (1994)
  6. Madden T, "Pharmacokinetics of once-daily IV busulfan as part of pretransplantation preparative regimens : a comparison with an every 6-hour dosing schedule", Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 13(1), pp.56~64 (2007)
  7. Ryu S-G, "Randomized comparison of four-times-daily versus once-daily intravenous busulfan in conditioning therapy for hematopoietic cell transplantation", Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 13(9), pp.1095~1105 (2007)
  8. Ice, L, "2021 Oncology Pharmacy Preparatory Review and Recertification Course: Online Book", pp.24~25 (2021), American Pharmacists Association
  9. Ciurea SO, "Busulfan in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation", Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 15(5), pp.523~536 (2009)
  10. Esteves I, "Pharmacokinetics analysis results are similar for oral compared to intravenous busulfan in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, except for the earlier onset of mucositis. A controlled clinical study", Bone marrow transplantation, 54(11), pp.1799~1804 (2019)
  11. Schuler US, "Pharmacokinetics of intravenous busulfan and evaluation of the bioavailability of the oral formulation in conditioning for haematopoietic stem cell transplantation", Bone marrow transplantation, 22(3), pp.241~244 (1998)
  12. Andersson BS, "Conditioning therapy with intravenous busulfan and cyclophosphamide(IV BuCy2)for hematologic malignancies prior to allogeneic stem cell transplantation : a phase II study", Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 8(3), pp.145~154 (2002)
  13. Lee JH, "Decreased incidence of hepatic veno-occlusive disease and fewer hemostatic derangements associated with intravenous busulfan vs oral busulfan in adults conditioned with busulfan + cyclophosphamide for allogeneic bone marrow transplantation", Annals of hematology, 84(5), pp.321~330 (2005)
  14. McCune JS, "Plasma concentration monitoring of busulfan : does it improve clinical outcome?", Clinical pharmacokinetics, 39(2), pp.155~165 (2000)
  15. Arai Y, "Risk factors and prognosis of hepatic acute GvHD after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation", Bone marrow transplantation, 51(1), pp.96~102 (2016)
  16. Szydlo R, "Results of allogeneic bone marrow transplants for leukemia using donors other than HLA-identical siblings", J Clin Oncol, 15(5), pp.1767~1777 (1997)
  17. Pasquini, "Intravenous busulfan-based myeloablative conditioning regimens prior to hematopoietic cell transplantation for hematologic malignancies", Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 22(8), pp.1424~1430 (2016)

관련 논문AI추천

Clinical Experience of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Elderly Patients Aged 60 Years and Older in South Korea김세형, 김찬규, 박성규, 안재숙, 원종호, 윤진아, 임성희, 장금하, 지영석연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2023 · 제64권 제2호Clinical impact of anti-thymocyte globulin on survival and graft-versus-host disease in patients undergoing human leukocyte antigen mismatched allogeneic stem cell transplantationDajung Kim, Ho-Jin Shin, Ho Sup Lee, Jae-Sook Ahn, Je-Hwan Lee, Joon-Ho Moon, Silvia Park, Taeyun Kim, Won Sik Lee, Yunsuk Choi대한내과학회 · The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine2020 · 제35권 제2호동종조혈모세포이식에서 거대세포바이러스 감염에 미치는 전처치요법 강도의 영향과 관련위험인자 분석손기호, 이영미, 이혜민, 인용원, 임현정, 정선영, 정철원, 허윤정한국임상약학회 · 한국임상약학회지2012 · 제22권 제2호Does anti-thymocyte globulin have a place in busulfan/ fludarabine conditioning for matched related donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation?김경하, Chang Wook Min, Chan-Kyu Kim, Dae-Sik Hong, Hyun Jung Kim, Jina Yun, Jong-Ho Won, Kyu-Taek Lee, Min Sung Lee, Se Hyung Kim, Seong Kyu Park, Young Sok Ji대한내과학회 · The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine2016 · 제31권 제4호동종 조혈모세포 이식환자에서 Pentoxifylline의 간정맥폐쇄성 질환 예방효과김남희, 김재송, 손은선, 이소영한국병원약사회 · 병원약사회지2019 · 제36권 제3호급성 이식편대숙주병 예방을 위한 Tacrolimus 적정 혈중농도 설정김미진, 박애령, 이정연, 황보신이한국병원약사회 · 병원약사회지2020 · 제37권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)