본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

급성 림프구성 백혈병 환아에서 항암화학요법 후 사용되는 Filgrastim과 Lenograstim의 효과 비교

The Comparison of Filgrastim and Lenograstim on Hematologic Effects after Chemotherapy in Children with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

초록

Abstract

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor(G-CSF) has been incorporated into the treatment regimens of many patients in an effort to decrease the risk of neutropenic complications, including febrile neutropenia after myelosuppressive chemotherapy regimens. In doing so, it could significantly reduce incidence and severity of neutropenic infection, thus decreasing morbidity and health care expenditure. Two formulations of recombinant human G-CSF(rhG-CSF), one non-glycosylated(filgrastim) and one glycosylated(lenograstim), are available. This study was undertaken to compare the hematologic effects of filgrastim and lenograstim after chemotherapy in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia(ALL). From September 2005 to August 2006, 157 cases(87 filgratim, 70 lenograstim) with acute lymphoblastic leukemia who had received G-CSF after chemotherapy at Seoul National University Hospital department of pediatrics were studied. We retrospectively analyzed the duration of G-CSF treatment, neutropenia and the frequency of neutropenic fever, IV antibiotic treatment. There was no significant difference in duration of GCSF treatment(5.3±3.7 vs 4.6±3.1 days, filgrastim vs lenograstim, Mean±SD), time to absolute neutrophil count(ANC) recovery to above 500/mm3(5.1±3.7 vs 4.7±3.0 days), febrile days(2.3±1.6 vs 2.3±1.5 days), and duration of antibiotic treatment(6.0±3.0 vs 5.7±2.7 days) Also, frequency of neutropenic fever and antibiotic treatment were similar in both groups. In summary, in terms of their clinical effect on neutropenia, the two G-CSF preparations appeared to have identical activity. A large-scale randomized prospective studies are necessary to confirm and evaluate the efficacy of two types of G-CSF.

참고문헌 (9)

  1. FrancÁise Martin-Christin, "Granulocyte colony stimulating factors: How different are they? How to make a decision?", Anti- Cancer Drugs, 12, pp.185~191 (2001)
  2. G.J. Nohynek, "Comparison of the potency of glycosylated and nonglycosylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in neutropenic and nonneutropenic CD rats", Cancer Chemother Pharmacol, 39, pp.259~266 (1997)
  3. In Hyang Kim, "Comparison of lenograstim and filgrastim on haematological effects after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation with high-dose chemotherapy", Curr Med Res Opin, 19(8), pp.753~759 (2003)
  4. A. Hü ttmann, "Comparison of lenograstim and filgrastim : effects on blood cell recovery after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation", J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 131, pp.152~156 (2005)
  5. H Bönig, "Glycosylated vs non-glycosylated granulocyte colonystimulating factor (G-CSF)-results of a prospective randomised monocentre study", Bone Marrow Transplantation, 28, pp.259~264 (2001)
  6. Bobey GP., "Quantitative relationships between circulating leukocytes and infection in patients with acute leukemia", Ann Oncol, 6, pp.445~451 (1995)
  7. Bo young Kim, "Drug use evaluation on filgrastim", J. Korean Soc. Hosp. Pharm, 13(2), pp.126~132 (1996)
  8. Nissen C., "Glycosylation of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor : implications for stability and potency", Eur J Cancer, 30A(suppl. 3), pp.12~14 (1994)
  9. Dawn Marie Stull, "Comparison of sargramostim and filgrastim in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia", Am J Health-Syst Pharm, 62, pp.83~87 (2005)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)