본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Ceftazidime/Avibactam의 사용 적절성 및 유효성 평가

Evaluation of the Appropriateness and Efficacy of Ceftazidime / Avibactam

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Background: Antibiotic resistance is a critical global health challenge. Ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) introduced in July 2023 targets resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections unresponsive to carbapenem antibiotics. Since its reimbursement inclusion in February 2024, CZA usage has steadily increased. This study aimed to assess CZA utilization and evaluate its appropriateness and clinical outcomes. Methods: A retrospective analysis of electronic medical records was conducted for adult patients treated with CZA for ≥ 3 days at a tertiary hospital from July 2023 to July 2024. Data on indications, dosages, and administration were collected and efficacy was assessed based on treatment success rates, 30-day mortality, and clinical laboratory improvements. Results: Among 229 CZA-treated patients, 175 met the inclusion criteria. Klebsiella pneumoniae was the most common identified pathogen. It was found in (159) 91% patients, Of the 175 patients, 101 (58%) received CZA for approved indications, while 74 (42%) were treated off-label primarily for bacteremia. Most (168, 96%) patients adhered to approved dosages. The overall treatment success rate was 63%, showing no significant differences by indication. Monotherapy demonstrated a significantly higher treatment success rate for patients with bacteremia than combination therapy (p<0.05). Among all patients, 40 (29%) were treated with combination therapy. Within 30 days of CZA discontinuation, 42 (24%) died. Mortality showed no significant differences by indication or concomitant antibiotic use. Conclusion: The treatment success rate of monotherapy with CZA was significantly higher than that of combination therapy for patients with bacteremia. Treatment success rates and 30-day mortality showed no significant differences by indications. Thus, for safe and effective treatment of multidrug-resistant infections, appropriate use and management of CZA as a restricted antibiotic should be continuously monitored.

Abstract

Background: Antibiotic resistance is a critical global health challenge. Ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) introduced in July 2023 targets resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections unresponsive to carbapenem antibiotics. Since its reimbursement inclusion in February 2024, CZA usage has steadily increased. This study aimed to assess CZA utilization and evaluate its appropriateness and clinical outcomes. Methods: A retrospective analysis of electronic medical records was conducted for adult patients treated with CZA for ≥ 3 days at a tertiary hospital from July 2023 to July 2024. Data on indications, dosages, and administration were collected and efficacy was assessed based on treatment success rates, 30-day mortality, and clinical laboratory improvements. Results: Among 229 CZA-treated patients, 175 met the inclusion criteria. Klebsiella pneumoniae was the most common identified pathogen. It was found in (159) 91% patients, Of the 175 patients, 101 (58%) received CZA for approved indications, while 74 (42%) were treated off-label primarily for bacteremia. Most (168, 96%) patients adhered to approved dosages. The overall treatment success rate was 63%, showing no significant differences by indication. Monotherapy demonstrated a significantly higher treatment success rate for patients with bacteremia than combination therapy (p<0.05). Among all patients, 40 (29%) were treated with combination therapy. Within 30 days of CZA discontinuation, 42 (24%) died. Mortality showed no significant differences by indication or concomitant antibiotic use. Conclusion: The treatment success rate of monotherapy with CZA was significantly higher than that of combination therapy for patients with bacteremia. Treatment success rates and 30-day mortality showed no significant differences by indications. Thus, for safe and effective treatment of multidrug-resistant infections, appropriate use and management of CZA as a restricted antibiotic should be continuously monitored.

관련 논문AI추천

Nationwide Analysis of Antimicrobial Prescription in Korean Hospitals between 2018 and 2021: The 2023 KONAS ReportChae Jungmi, Choi Jun Yong, Heo Seok-Jae, Kim Bongyoung, Kim Yong Chan, Park Hyo Jung, Yun I Ji대한감염학회 · Infection and Chemotherapy2024 · 제56권 제2호Non-carbapenem Drugs for Patients with Bacteremia caused by Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae: Piperacillin-Tazobactam김미선, 오현주, 유정래, 이승희, 허상택대한내과학회 · 대한내과학회지2024 · 제99권 제3호원내 폐렴 진료 지침 수립 후 경험 항생제 선택의 적절성 평가강지영, 김의석, 김형숙, 김홍빈, 송경호, 이은숙, 정영미, 황주희, 남궁형욱, Eunkyung Euni Lee한국병원약사회 · 병원약사회지2018 · 제35권 제4호Current Status of Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy in Korea: Experience of a Single University-Affiliated Acute-Care Hospital이주연, Choi Yoonhee, Heo Eunjeong, Jung Jongtak, Kim Eu Suk, Kim Hong Bin, Kim Hyung-sook, Lee Euni, Lee Eunsook, Namgung Hyung Wook, Song Kyoung-Ho대한감염학회 · Infection and Chemotherapy2023 · 제55권 제2호카바페넴 내성 장내세균에서의 새로운 베타락탐/베타락타마제 억제제 병합 항균제의 감수성 평가와 고찰송새암대한내과학회 · 대한내과학회지2025 · 제100권 제4호Epidemiology and treatment of antimicrobialresistant gram-negative bacteria in KoreaYoon Soo Park, Young Ah Kim대한내과학회 · The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine2018 · 제33권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)